Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

West Coast football rests on Lincoln Riley's shoulders

godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,461 Founders Club
Not to save the Pac-12, that ship is allready sailed and has become just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

The sooner Lincoln can get SC back to running train on the conference the better.

The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

Comments

  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,827 Swaye's Wigwam
    If we? are relying on Lincoln Riley to bring back the PAC, we? should drink bleach and play with matches now.
  • TXDawgTXDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 829 Founders Club
    TheHB said:

    If we? are relying on Lincoln Riley to bring back the PAC, we? should drink bleach and play with matches now.

    In a pool of jet fuel.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,796 Founders Club
    TXDawg said:

    TheHB said:

    If we? are relying on Lincoln Riley to bring back the PAC, we? should drink bleach and play with matches now.

    In a pool of jet fuel.
    Jet fuel is mostly kerosene. I'd want something more volatile, like gasoline.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,612 Swaye's Wigwam
    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,461 Founders Club
    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    It’s gonna happen. A Big-10/PAC-12 conference will be formed. Oregon, UW, Furd, SC, UCLA and ASU. Will be part of a 16 Team conference. Maybe Utah.
  • EmotermanEmoterman Member Posts: 3,333
    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 is a conference with no history and no meaningful bowl tie ins. PAC has as much history as any conference and is tied to two of the most important bowls. No one wants the PAC to dissolve, and USC won't want to severe that tie.

    Pac12 has been punished by media distribution cabal for trying to elbow their way in at the table and failing. Once the new media deal is in place with a proper legacy media partner, Pac won't be maligned nearly so much.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,612 Swaye's Wigwam
    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 situation has fuckall to do with the Pac, B1G, and ACC schools and commissioners, their mentality about athletics, and their attitude about the SEC. If that's you're rationale than you're fucking clueless.
  • MotrboatnsobMotrboatnsob Member Posts: 424
    He’s already lost 2 coaches from his USC staff. RB coach (came from Ga tech?)who went to Texas and D line coach who came from OU with him and went to LSU. Solid start. Guys saw cost of living in California and said fuck it.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,466 Swaye's Wigwam
    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    The PAC would need USC, UW, UCLA, and UO to leave to be on the same level as the B12
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,461 Founders Club
    Canadawg said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    The PAC would need USC, UW, UCLA, and UO to leave to be on the same level as the B12
    That's why I said 2-4 teams.

    Pac-12
    Emoterman said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 is a conference with no history and no meaningful bowl tie ins. PAC has as much history as any conference and is tied to two of the most important bowls. No one wants the PAC to dissolve, and USC won't want to severe that tie.

    Pac12 has been punished by media distribution cabal for trying to elbow their way in at the table and failing. Once the new media deal is in place with a proper legacy media partner, Pac won't be maligned nearly so much.
    So Espn and Fox weren't the legacy partners last media rights deal?

    Pac-12 has pigeoned wholed themselves into one thing (along with SEC going to ABC/ESPN) and that is "Pac-12 after dark" which is code for networks to show games at night on the west coast after the College Football Day is over for everyone East of Boulder.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,612 Swaye's Wigwam
    godawgst said:

    Canadawg said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    The PAC would need USC, UW, UCLA, and UO to leave to be on the same level as the B12
    That's why I said 2-4 teams.

    Pac-12
    Emoterman said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 is a conference with no history and no meaningful bowl tie ins. PAC has as much history as any conference and is tied to two of the most important bowls. No one wants the PAC to dissolve, and USC won't want to severe that tie.

    Pac12 has been punished by media distribution cabal for trying to elbow their way in at the table and failing. Once the new media deal is in place with a proper legacy media partner, Pac won't be maligned nearly so much.
    So Espn and Fox weren't the legacy partners last media rights deal?

    Pac-12 has pigeoned wholed themselves into one thing (along with SEC going to ABC/ESPN) and that is "Pac-12 after dark" which is code for networks to show games at night on the west coast after the College Football Day is over for everyone East of Boulder.
    The Pac 12 Network and Larry Scott is what has got them into this situation.

    That will be remedied when their TV deal is up and they partner with Fox and cut Nick Aliotti and their dead weight fucking network. And yes they are able to show games in a time slot that none of the other power 5 can, dunno what senile point you were trying to make there as it doesn't mean that Pac 12 games will stop airing during the day, and it gives them the ability to get more money for their deal

    The college football day isn't over east of Boulder at 10 EST on a Saturday dipshit. You have no idea what you're evening talking about.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,726 Standard Supporter
    Larry Scott fucked the Pac 12

    The ONLY thing that is going to save this shithole conference is USC cheating like motherfuckers and LA dropping serious coin into building brands via NIL deals.

    Save us, Snoop Dogg.

  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,461 Founders Club
    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    Canadawg said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    The PAC would need USC, UW, UCLA, and UO to leave to be on the same level as the B12
    That's why I said 2-4 teams.

    Pac-12
    Emoterman said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 is a conference with no history and no meaningful bowl tie ins. PAC has as much history as any conference and is tied to two of the most important bowls. No one wants the PAC to dissolve, and USC won't want to severe that tie.

    Pac12 has been punished by media distribution cabal for trying to elbow their way in at the table and failing. Once the new media deal is in place with a proper legacy media partner, Pac won't be maligned nearly so much.
    So Espn and Fox weren't the legacy partners last media rights deal?

    Pac-12 has pigeoned wholed themselves into one thing (along with SEC going to ABC/ESPN) and that is "Pac-12 after dark" which is code for networks to show games at night on the west coast after the College Football Day is over for everyone East of Boulder.
    The Pac 12 Network and Larry Scott is what has got them into this situation.

    That will be remedied when their TV deal is up and they partner with Fox and cut Nick Aliotti and their dead weight fucking network. And yes they are able to show games in a time slot that none of the other power 5 can, dunno what senile point you were trying to make there as it doesn't mean that Pac 12 games will stop airing during the day, and it gives them the ability to get more money for their deal

    The college football day isn't over east of Boulder at 10 EST on a Saturday dipshit. You have no idea what you're evening talking about.
    Bullshit. The Pac-12 Network had to go it alone b/c Espn or Any Other Network wanted to partner with them (and still don't). You think it's any better today? Running videos of fish tanks gets more eyeballs than they do. You'd have to pay Direct or Dish (whichever one they aren't on) for them to carry the Network.

    I will say it again. With Fox having the Big 10/Ohio State Network, and ABC/ESPN carrying the SEC (and iirc plan on running 2 games per week on Komo 4) the Pac-12 fills one need and that is NIGHT GAMES. That's not being senile that's fucking common sense and basic logic.

    If College Football wasn't over on a National Stage when Pac-12 after dark begins, Christian M would have won the Heisman the year he had 25 td's. He didn't b/c no one was up to see or watch it.

    Go look at the ratings for the day games across the country and the Pac-12 at night. Not even in same universe.

    But keep holding onto the fantasy that Larry Scott and the Pac-12 Network was/is the issue.

  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,612 Swaye's Wigwam
    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    Canadawg said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    The PAC would need USC, UW, UCLA, and UO to leave to be on the same level as the B12
    That's why I said 2-4 teams.

    Pac-12
    Emoterman said:

    godawgst said:

    haie said:

    godawgst said:

    just a matter of when not if SC and whatever 2-4 other teams the Big 10 decides to take in to keep serve as best they can with the SEC.

    The merger of the MWC and leftover Pac-12 teams will however be a nice little G5 story 1-2 times a decade.

    None of that is going to happen. Fuck yourself.
    That's what the Big 12 said when they had OU and Texas

    Your delusional/in denial if you don't think it's going to happen.
    Big 12 is a conference with no history and no meaningful bowl tie ins. PAC has as much history as any conference and is tied to two of the most important bowls. No one wants the PAC to dissolve, and USC won't want to severe that tie.

    Pac12 has been punished by media distribution cabal for trying to elbow their way in at the table and failing. Once the new media deal is in place with a proper legacy media partner, Pac won't be maligned nearly so much.
    So Espn and Fox weren't the legacy partners last media rights deal?

    Pac-12 has pigeoned wholed themselves into one thing (along with SEC going to ABC/ESPN) and that is "Pac-12 after dark" which is code for networks to show games at night on the west coast after the College Football Day is over for everyone East of Boulder.
    The Pac 12 Network and Larry Scott is what has got them into this situation.

    That will be remedied when their TV deal is up and they partner with Fox and cut Nick Aliotti and their dead weight fucking network. And yes they are able to show games in a time slot that none of the other power 5 can, dunno what senile point you were trying to make there as it doesn't mean that Pac 12 games will stop airing during the day, and it gives them the ability to get more money for their deal

    The college football day isn't over east of Boulder at 10 EST on a Saturday dipshit. You have no idea what you're evening talking about.
    Bullshit. The Pac-12 Network had to go it alone b/c Espn or Any Other Network wanted to partner with them (and still don't). You think it's any better today? Running videos of fish tanks gets more eyeballs than they do. You'd have to pay Direct or Dish (whichever one they aren't on) for them to carry the Network.

    I will say it again. With Fox having the Big 10/Ohio State Network, and ABC/ESPN carrying the SEC (and iirc plan on running 2 games per week on Komo 4) the Pac-12 fills one need and that is NIGHT GAMES. That's not being senile that's fucking common sense and basic logic.

    If College Football wasn't over on a National Stage when Pac-12 after dark begins, Christian M would have won the Heisman the year he had 25 td's. He didn't b/c no one was up to see or watch it.

    Go look at the ratings for the day games across the country and the Pac-12 at night. Not even in same universe.

    But keep holding onto the fantasy that Larry Scott and the Pac-12 Network was/is the issue.

    Umm yeah dumb fuck a night game featuring Arizona and Oregon State won't score as high as the UCLA v Stanford at noon. Amazing analysis there. Same with "figuring out" that a Pac 12 network won't be as attractive as some others. The west coast and their most prominent schools are still vital to CFB.

    "Christian McCaffrey would have won the Heisman otherwise", shut the fuck up dude. Go watch something else if you're too poor to go get a hotel room or drive home late at night.

    The Pac 12 Network chose to go it alone and not compromise with Fox/ESPN because Larry Scott had a coked out tech vision quest to turn the conference into some Olympic sports startup where west coast Olds like you can get their rocks off watching Utah gymnastics in your own regional subnetwork. It was a massive reach at the time and even though the university presidents cheered it on (because they're almost as stupid as you) the AD's and everyone else knew it would be a disaster.

    Then the Direct TV shit happened because his whole platform is a fucking joke. Go watch the Pac 12 network some time. It's 100% the reason they fucked up the conference and why they hired a business guy to start getting ready for the next negotiations.
  • theLSkidtheLSkid Member Posts: 344

    Larry Scott fucked the Pac 12

    The ONLY thing that is going to save this shithole conference is USC cheating like motherfuckers and LA dropping serious coin into building brands via NIL deals.

    Save us, Snoop Dogg.

    Best take I’ve seen today, throbba
Sign In or Register to comment.