Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do you know how many coaches don’t make 9 mil/per?

MikeSeaver
MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
edited February 16 in College Football Forum
Why give it to this guy?

If you’re willing to go that high you can almost pick your coach of choice.

This is going to be a grave error if he accepts this alleged contract.
«13

Comments

  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,261

    Why give it to this guy?

    If you’re willing to go that high you can almost pick your coach of choice.

    This is going to be a grave error if he accepts this alleged contract.

    I’m not worried about Mario leaving. He’s not a very good coach and the offensive product is unwatchable even when winning. What I am worried about is mullens botching the hire, especially in a high turnover year where the top candidates are mostly off the board already. If he was a good AD, he’d take the 9m/year he was going to give Mario and give it to lane train. But it’s mullens so he’ll view it as cost savings and give Wilcox 2.7/year and claim it as a win
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    ntxduck said:

    Why give it to this guy?

    If you’re willing to go that high you can almost pick your coach of choice.

    This is going to be a grave error if he accepts this alleged contract.

    I’m not worried about Mario leaving. He’s not a very good coach and the offensive product is unwatchable even when winning. What I am worried about is mullens botching the hire, especially in a high turnover year where the top candidates are mostly off the board already. If he was a good AD, he’d take the 9m/year he was going to give Mario and give it to lane train. But it’s mullens so he’ll view it as cost savings and give Wilcox 2.7/year and claim it as a win
    The landscape has changed since we last needed to go outside for a hire and I don’t think it’s Mullens making the final decisions.

    Big Kiffers would be an amazing hire even if only for a few years. Keeps Oregon relevant and I’m sure he’d love to stick it up Trojan rectum.

    If Oregon hires Wilcox we might as well not even play the games. I can’t imagine they’d let him anywhere near that program.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I’ve always been 50/50 on MC. A+ recruiter, C+ coach. Obvious that his coordinators are on a short leash. Doesn’t maximize talent. Had JH and made him pedestrian.

    Brand of ball is sleep inducing. Loyal to a fault. AB. This was the year to develop TT and set up for 2022 and opening with UGA. There are FR QB’s playing around the country. Inexcusable not getting him snaps this year.

    As far as a possible replacements if MC leaves. This isn’t a UW situation. The roster is talented and the youngest in the country, with success. Mullins had better not F it up if a new hire is necessary.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    MC wants 12 play tuff guy drives so there's 12 opportunities to turn the ball over, rather than 4-5 plays and an explosion TD. Did he watch what Bama just did to the greatest D that CFB has ever seen today? His old boss changed with the times, MC has an OL mindset. Oregon ruled this conference with 3-4 star guys and real coaching. I will be more disappointed if he doesn't bolt. Duck football is dreck. Attendance says so.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,039 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    MC wants 12 play tuff guy drives so there's 12 opportunities to turn the ball over, rather than 4-5 plays and an explosion TD. Did he watch what Bama just did to the greatest D that CFB has ever seen since the 1991 Washington Huskies today? His old boss changed with the times, MC has an OL mindset. Oregon ruled this conference with 3-4 star guys and real coaching. I will be more disappointed if he doesn't bolt. Duck football is dreck. Attendance says so.

    fixed that for you
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,769 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2021
    Oregon has 20, ahem, TWENTY players at just the skill positions on offense who were rated a 247 composite 4 star.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042

    46XiJCAB said:

    MC wants 12 play tuff guy drives so there's 12 opportunities to turn the ball over, rather than 4-5 plays and an explosion TD. Did he watch what Bama just did to the greatest D that CFB has ever seen since the 1991 Washington Huskies today? His old boss changed with the times, MC has an OL mindset. Oregon ruled this conference with 3-4 star guys and real coaching. I will be more disappointed if he doesn't bolt. Duck football is dreck. Attendance says so.

    fixed that for you
    How do you think the 1991 Husky D would do against the size and speed of today’s offenses?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited December 2021
    dtd said:

    Oregon has 20, ahem, TWENTY players at just the skill positions on offense who were rated a 247 composite 4 star.

    With a -**** QB to guide them. Thanks MC. Makes the job that much more attractive for their new HC.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    This thread is my dream come true.