Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate Kwat for the same reasons Race hates Haener
I don't blame him for telling Lake to fuck off but I don't care
On first read I pictured Sark running his tongue over Gary's back hair, liver spots and atypical moles. It made me chuckle. On second read I got the joke. It takes a minute.
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
The 4-2-5 is literally what we’ve ran for the last 8 years, nothing different. The Husky position is another way of saying Nickel, or Star if you’re a Rams fan. The 4-2-5 relies heavily on interior pass rush and versatile DB play, we did not have a nickel who could play the run game (bookie) And the interior pass rush was non-existent, it’s hard for the DEs to sack a QB AND keep contain.
We played a 4-2-5 but with a regular nickel, not a hybrid safety/lb big nickel. The DL alignment and gap responsibilities will also be different.
We put way too much on our DTs in the run game, and on our DBs in the pass game. Worked well when we had elite corners and elite DTs. This year we only had elite corners.
Better to have a scheme where you find guys who can fill a role, rather than require certain positions to be good at everything.
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
At Texas, the head coach is the issue.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
At Texas, the head coach is the issue.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
That was a great defense
By 2019 it wasn't. This year it was pathetic at Texas
I know Lake took over but Kwat agreed to let him have the title and 81 percent here thought it was great
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
At Texas, the head coach is the issue.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
He was fine then. 91 was a great defense for lambo. 98 wasn’t. The scheme is easy to beat if you throw underneath and run the ball patiently. And kwat and jimmy still commit to deep safeties in obvious run situations. Or play nickel personnel when 3rd and short.
Things change. Things stay the same. Quit living in the past.
As the first Jimmy Lake hatter here, I wouldn't really have a problem bringing Kwat back.
Its a little bit lazy and a bit safe but there are 100s worse DCs DeBoner could pick and it would allow Deboner to simplify his job as Offense and recruiting.
Will never understand Kwat hitching his wagon to Sark. Dude could have gone to any number of big-time programs.
Perplexing to say the least.
Simple. Jimmy is/was that bad.
Imagine doing all the work for your your subordinate only for him to get promoted to equal "co-DC" and then get a massive HC bag when you know he doesnt know shit, hasn't learned shit, and never did any of the actual work. I dont blame him.
Same feeling here. I have to admit that Kwat probably made the best choice. He damaged his reputation but that will fade and he made a fuck ton if money doing it. He got away from Jimmy which must've felt like the most important thing to him.
I dont know that I'd want him back. His success was with Petersen as HC. Pete's assistants, for the most part, overperform.
Will never understand Kwat hitching his wagon to Sark. Dude could have gone to any number of big-time programs.
Perplexing to say the least.
Simple. Jimmy is/was that bad.
Imagine doing all the work for your your subordinate only for him to get promoted to equal "co-DC" and then get a massive HC bag when you know he doesnt know shit, hasn't learned shit, and never did any of the actual work. I dont blame him.
Same feeling here. I have to admit that Kwat probably made the best choice. He damaged his reputation but that will fade and he made a fuck ton if money doing it. He got away from Jimmy which must've felt like the most important thing to him.
I dont know that I'd want him back. His success was with Petersen as HC. Pete's assistants, for the most part, overperform.
Will never understand Kwat hitching his wagon to Sark. Dude could have gone to any number of big-time programs.
Perplexing to say the least.
Simple. Jimmy is/was that bad.
Imagine doing all the work for your your subordinate only for him to get promoted to equal "co-DC" and then get a massive HC bag when you know he doesnt know shit, hasn't learned shit, and never did any of the actual work. I dont blame him.
Same feeling here. I have to admit that Kwat probably made the best choice. He damaged his reputation but that will fade and he made a fuck ton if money doing it. He got away from Jimmy which must've felt like the most important thing to him.
I dont know that I'd want him back. His success was with Petersen as HC. Pete's assistants, for the most part, overperform.
Say again?
His assistants are better under him than they do without him. Jonathan Smith is the only example I can think of that doesn't fit.
The 4-2-5 is literally what we’ve ran for the last 8 years, nothing different. The Husky position is another way of saying Nickel, or Star if you’re a Rams fan. The 4-2-5 relies heavily on interior pass rush and versatile DB play, we did not have a nickel who could play the run game (bookie) And the interior pass rush was non-existent, it’s hard for the DEs to sack a QB AND keep contain.
We played a 4-2-5 but with a regular nickel, not a hybrid safety/lb big nickel. The DL alignment and gap responsibilities will also be different.
We put way too much on our DTs in the run game, and on our DBs in the pass game. Worked well when we had elite corners and elite DTs. This year we only had elite corners.
Better to have a scheme where you find guys who can fill a role, rather than require certain positions to be good at everything.
And it was a two-high look way too often with both safeties way off the LOS. We were outmanned inside the box and our safeties would make tackles after an eight yard gain. (That is, when they didn't take a horrible angle and miss the tackle completely.) It was the easiest pre-snap read in the world for the QB to make.
Shoot that version of 4-2-5 into the sun, or at least the idiot playcaller that would show that look on, like, 2nd and 4.
Will never understand Kwat hitching his wagon to Sark. Dude could have gone to any number of big-time programs.
Perplexing to say the least.
Simple. Jimmy is/was that bad.
Imagine doing all the work for your your subordinate only for him to get promoted to equal "co-DC" and then get a massive HC bag when you know he doesnt know shit, hasn't learned shit, and never did any of the actual work. I dont blame him.
Same feeling here. I have to admit that Kwat probably made the best choice. He damaged his reputation but that will fade and he made a fuck ton if money doing it. He got away from Jimmy which must've felt like the most important thing to him.
I dont know that I'd want him back. His success was with Petersen as HC. Pete's assistants, for the most part, overperform.
Say again?
His assistants are better under him than they do without him. Jonathan Smith is the only example I can think of that doesn't fit.
Same with James. We chased his assistants for a decade or more
Gilby was the exception then as an assistant not head coach. Could always coach the O line
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
At Texas, the head coach is the issue.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
That was a great defense
By 2019 it wasn't. This year it was pathetic at Texas
I know Lake took over but Kwat agreed to let him have the title and 81 percent here thought it was great
2016 d line was one of the better ones we had. Too bad we did not have a fucking edge rusher worth a shit
Why? Produced nothing but great defenses when he was here. Was the first to recognize Jimmy as the incompetent boob he was, and this year's broken D under Bob just further solidified how integral Kwat was to our defensive success.
I don't want him back since we need to completely cleanse ourselves of all things Pete and Jimmy, and I of course enjoyed seeing him and Sark fail epically in Texas. But I'll always love him for the badass Ds he gave us during his tenure here.
Peas and carrots isn't going to cut it anymore.
Wouldn't the whole point of hiring Donte Williams as co-DC would be to hire someone like Kwat who is a good defensive mind but not a recruiter? I want to move on from the Petersen tree so I hope we can get someone else but I would not lose sleep if Kwat was hired back here. He won't be so that point is moot but still.
I hate kwat because his scheme is limp dick football. Texas was a huge disaster on defense this year. It worked before coaches figured it out. It’s like how lambo stayed with the 46 defense way too long.
At Texas, the head coach is the issue.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
That was a great defense
By 2019 it wasn't. This year it was pathetic at Texas
I know Lake took over but Kwat agreed to let him have the title and 81 percent here thought it was great
2016 d line was one of the better ones we had. Too bad we did not have a fucking edge rusher worth a shit
The 4-2-5 is literally what we’ve ran for the last 8 years, nothing different. The Husky position is another way of saying Nickel, or Star if you’re a Rams fan. The 4-2-5 relies heavily on interior pass rush and versatile DB play, we did not have a nickel who could play the run game (bookie) And the interior pass rush was non-existent, it’s hard for the DEs to sack a QB AND keep contain.
We played a 4-2-5 but with a regular nickel, not a hybrid safety/lb big nickel. The DL alignment and gap responsibilities will also be different.
We put way too much on our DTs in the run game, and on our DBs in the pass game. Worked well when we had elite corners and elite DTs. This year we only had elite corners.
Better to have a scheme where you find guys who can fill a role, rather than require certain positions to be good at everything.
You’re talking personnel differences and packages, not scheme. Look at TCU from 2009 vs 2019, looks like a different defense because the SS (their nickel) is a massive linebacker in 09, now he’s an Elijah molden type, it’s how football changes and who you can RECRUIT.
The DL will change because our younger guys weren’t able to slant techniques like a traditional 4-2-5, they didn’t have the ability and would get washed. We tried it, didn’t work. Playing a base front in a 4-2-5 is not what coaches want to do anyways.
I agree with what you said about DBs and DTs but that won’t change with this Fresno Scheme.
Recruit better players = Defense gets better
Now if you want to talk about Arandas 3-4 Tite front..
Comments
I don't blame him for telling Lake to fuck off but I don't care
We put way too much on our DTs in the run game, and on our DBs in the pass game. Worked well when we had elite corners and elite DTs. This year we only had elite corners.
Better to have a scheme where you find guys who can fill a role, rather than require certain positions to be good at everything.
Kwait held Bama to 17 points when they averaged 42 PPG
By 2019 it wasn't. This year it was pathetic at Texas
I know Lake took over but Kwat agreed to let him have the title and 81 percent here thought it was great
Things change. Things stay the same. Quit living in the past.
Its a little bit lazy and a bit safe but there are 100s worse DCs DeBoner could pick and it would allow Deboner to simplify his job as Offense and recruiting.
I dont know that I'd want him back. His success was with Petersen as HC. Pete's assistants, for the most part, overperform.
Shoot that version of 4-2-5 into the sun, or at least the idiot playcaller that would show that look on, like, 2nd and 4.
Gilby was the exception then as an assistant not head coach. Could always coach the O line
The DL will change because our younger guys weren’t able to slant techniques like a traditional 4-2-5, they didn’t have the ability and would get washed. We tried it, didn’t work. Playing a base front in a 4-2-5 is not what coaches want to do anyways.
I agree with what you said about DBs and DTs but that won’t change with this Fresno Scheme.
Recruit better players = Defense gets better
Now if you want to talk about Arandas 3-4 Tite front..