Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rittenhouse verdict

12931333435

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    hardhat said:

    15 pages in and someone doesn’t want to admit the role CNN, MSNBC, Joe Biden, and the Democrats played in getting the rittenhouse case, trial, and verdict wrong. Sad.

    I didn't spend time following it. I don't know who said or predicted what.

    If someone thought it was a slam dunk conviction, they were wrong. I never said anything like that. I am aware that there was a lot of nervousness expressed by many of you here because the jury deliberated so long, which makes it seem like anyone who thought the verdict was obvious is a fucking moron.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:


    Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.

    True. Close up.
    Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

    I can't imagine why that is.
    But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
    Maybe I do since you won't define it.

    Curious minds want to know.

    I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
    So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

    It’s not working.
    You painted yourself into a corner with a ridiculously stupid take and have nowhere to go.

    So now it's deflect, slink away, or triple down.

    What's it going to be?

    Nothing but popcorn.gif for the rest of us.
    You're making my case for payment. Tell Stalin to send me the money.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:


    Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.

    True. Close up.
    Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

    I can't imagine why that is.
    But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
    Maybe I do since you won't define it.

    Curious minds want to know.

    I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
    So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

    It’s not working.
    hardhat said:

    15 pages in and someone doesn’t want to admit the role CNN, MSNBC, Joe Biden, and the Democrats played in getting the rittenhouse case, trial, and verdict wrong. Sad.

    It wasn’t interesting, that’s why What’s His Name is 15 pages deep.

    Meltdown still rolling
    Oh Mr. Salads, how you do go on.

    How did you get past the ban?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:


    Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.

    True. Close up.
    Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

    I can't imagine why that is.
    But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
    Maybe I do since you won't define it.

    Curious minds want to know.

    I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
    So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

    It’s not working.
    You’ve never been one to run and hide.

    Time to dazzle everyone with that UW law degree and MBA you’re so proud of.

    Oh wait, Doog_Bot has embarrassed you when you’ve engaged with him before.
    Sorry Doog_Bot. The detective thinks you're doing well.

    Sure sign you're not.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    He’s no Colombo.

    Meltdown is special.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,541 Founders Club
    Triple poast meltdown confirmed.

    Don't hurt yourself.

    We'd hate to have viewership decline in your absence.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited November 2021
    What’s His Name is in good company. Owl thought I was NWFresh too.

    Great minds and stuff.

    Or

    Drooling morons
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Smart move.

    I’d run and hide too if I was you, Counselor.
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:


    Soft brain & short fuse is a bad combo. Seen that implosion before.

    True. Close up.
    Notice you didn't want to define conservatives for us.

    I can't imagine why that is.
    But you don’t have a dog in the fight.
    Maybe I do since you won't define it.

    Curious minds want to know.

    I'm sure your astute political science takes will be as informed as your economic ones.
    So you’re desperately seeking to be interesting.

    It’s not working.
    You painted yourself into a corner with a ridiculously stupid take and have nowhere to go.

    So now it's deflect, slink away, or triple down.

    What's it going to be?

    Nothing but popcorn.gif for the rest of us.
    You're making my case for payment. Tell Stalin to send me the money.
    You should be required to pay Stalin, PER POST.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    46XiJCAB said:

    What’s His Name is in good company. Owl thought I was NWFresh too.

    Great minds and stuff.

    Or

    Drooling morons

    You think Owl and I are the only ones who recognized you, PDX.

    Tough day for the Raiders. Bad weekend for ya.

  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    15 pages in and someone doesn’t want to admit the role CNN, MSNBC, Joe Biden, and the Democrats played in getting the rittenhouse case, trial, and verdict wrong. Sad.

    I didn't spend time following it. I don't know who said or predicted what.

    If someone thought it was a slam dunk conviction, they were wrong. I never said anything like that. I am aware that there was a lot of nervousness expressed by many of you here because the jury deliberated so long, which makes it seem like anyone who thought the verdict was obvious is a fucking moron.
    Tell us all about your experience with juries in criminal trials, you fucking hack.