Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

is this team "talented"?

2

Comments

  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,968

    ntxduck said:

    We are USC.

    USC has way more talent than UW
    Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh



    Bout' that recruiting the last few years.
    USC has two top 10 picks. Does UW even have a 2nd rounder?
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    We are USC.

    USC has way more talent than UW
    Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh



    Bout' that recruiting the last few years.
    USC has two top 10 picks. Does UW even have a 2nd rounder?
    McDuffie and Gordon will both be gone before the third.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 12,438
    edited November 2021

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
    Solid analysis.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 12,438

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
    Solid analysis.
    Awaiting yours.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,973 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited November 2021

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
    Solid analysis.
    Awaiting yours.
    Fremont likes their stars
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,988

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Hs talent is one thing. Need someone who will develop it.

    Talented players say fuck the scheme and coaches and go out there and maul people
    Need coaches who hold players accountable and know how to run a program. Games are won February-august. I can only imagine how much of a joke Jimmy’s practices and workouts were
    He probably copied everything Pete did as far as the workouts and practices.

    These players are soft and were soft even when Pete was the coach.
    Practices looked exactly the same for the most part
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,921
    ntxduck said:

    We are USC.

    USC has way more talent than UW
    We didn’t get ass blasted by Stanford or Oregon State so. We’ll have more guys drafted etc.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
    Solid analysis.
    Awaiting yours.
    You roll in the shit with pigs you just get shitty.
  • DodgyBlokeDodgyBloke Member Posts: 957
    If UW would have been competent to put up 30pts in each of the previous games we would be 7-2 with only just losing our 2nd game to ASU
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,973 Swaye's Wigwam

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This team has less talent than Coug at almost all positions.

    This might be the most insane thing I’ve ever read on this board full of delusional hot takes.
    QB - WSU
    RB - WSU (Borghi easily better than anyone at UW)
    OL - WSU
    WR - push, at best for UW. UW guys are still trading on potential. WSU throws for 300+ a game
    TE - no contest because WSU doesn't use TE's.

    Defensive side I guess UW has a better secondary. No way WSU has worse linebackers and it seems to me they have some DL who can actually make plays in the backfield while our? fat fuck lineman get pushed back 5 yards every play.

    WSU coaching also schemes to the advantages of their roster.

    I guess UW has a sweet punter, though. Or did until he was decapitated tonight.
    Solid analysis.
    Awaiting yours.
    You roll in the shit with pigs you just get shitty.
    Or you kill and eat the pig
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 12,438
    UW is about to roll in to the Apple Cup at 4-7 and lose to bowl eligible Coug, and somehow people will still insist UW has more talent. You are what your record says. This team is soft as charmin and not very good. This isn't a 9+ win team where they have a stumble on the road against an inferior team that can be explained away.
  • Fear_BonerFear_Boner Member Posts: 806
    Great:
    McDuffie
    Gordon
    Porter

    Good:
    Bruener (can be elite)
    Bookie
    Tuli
    ZTF
    McMillan
    Rome
    Bynum

    Meh:
    Taki
    Tui
    Taj

    The worst:
    Sirmon


  • BonedogBonedog Member Posts: 650

    Great:
    McDuffie
    Gordon
    Porter

    Good:
    Bruener (can be elite)
    Bookie
    Tuli
    ZTF
    McMillan
    Rome
    Bynum

    Meh:
    Taki
    Tui
    Taj

    The worst:
    Sirmon


    Fucking sucks
    Morris
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    UW is about to roll in to the Apple Cup at 4-7 and lose to bowl eligible Coug, and somehow people will still insist UW has more talent. You are what your record says. This team is soft as charmin and not very good. This isn't a 9+ win team where they have a stumble on the road against an inferior team that can be explained away.

    Coaching and QB. Its not complicated.
  • BonedogBonedog Member Posts: 650
    Tainted talent
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,775 Swaye's Wigwam

    We are USC.

    The kids are not even that close… they are also not bad as the cougs.

    With decent coaching at least a handful are worth a damn.
Sign In or Register to comment.