Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Can someone explain this defense ? Oregon will destroy UW

NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
edited October 2021 in Hardcore Husky Board


Corners are locked in man. If there’s two Corners in NCAA football you want to be on an island it’s Gordon and McDuffie…Bookie is one of the best tacklers on the team and an athletic Nickel. He is 15 yards away from the only open receiver. Why didn’t he flash and drop back at least

….and it’s 2 and 4 free first down
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
    edited October 2021

    Another example of Lake not stuffing the box. Clearly a running situation. And you have one of your safeties 15 yards back. Shaw has 10 people lined up against 8 and McDuffie had to move Smalls over into play. Overall a short gain but a team with less talent like WSU would have stuffed this play for no gain or a loss.

    Stanford goes down to kick… 3-0

    Talent wise this is a one or 2 loss team at worse right now. Scheme and coaching 2-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,400 Swaye's Wigwam
    That first play you pictured just about caused me to turn the game off before it really started. That was everything wrong with UW in a nutshell.

    In fairness they did make some adjustments, took thise throws away, and responded to the heavy run formation as the game went on. All Furd had to do though was to stick to more of a spread formation to scare the safeties back and pretty much anything they wanted to do out of it would work.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,400 Swaye's Wigwam
    MikeSeaver said:

    Oregon doesn’t destroy anyone.

    Oregon will keep UWs defense guessing and that's all it takes. When they guess right they still won't be able to contain Brown. Quook nation is going to be all worked up until the annual losses to Babushka and whomever is coaching WSU.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:



    Corners are locked in man. If there’s two Corners in NCAA football you want to be on an island it’s Gordon and McDuffie…Bookie is one of the best tacklers on the team and an athletic Nickel. He is 15 yards away from the only open receiver. Why didn’t he flash and drop back at least

    ….and it’s 2 and 4 free first down

    The two deep safeties against wildcat was baffling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,132 Swaye's Wigwam

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,132 Swaye's Wigwam

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
    edited October 2021
    Canadawg said:


    I compared this to the last series on defense.
    The linebackers are way to bunched. What the actual fuck? Even if they spread out 2 feet, they stop that play and Stanford punts. Also looking at the play the safety could have flashed and back pedaled. Horrible fucking defense. And did Stanford even have receivers playing?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,132 Swaye's Wigwam
    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Canadawg said:


    I compared this to the last series on defense.
    The linebackers are way to bunched. What the actual fuck? Even if they spread out 2 feet, they stop that play and Stanford punts. Also looking at the play the safety could have flashed and back pedaled. Horrible fucking defense. And did Stanford even have receivers playing?
    I dont see how the lbs would have affected the play?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
    edited October 2021
    Canadawg said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    Canadawg said:


    I compared this to the last series on defense.
    The linebackers are way to bunched. What the actual fuck? Even if they spread out 2 feet, they stop that play and Stanford punts. Also looking at the play the safety could have flashed and back pedaled. Horrible fucking defense. And did Stanford even have receivers playing?
    I dont see how the lbs would have affected the play?
    Watch the last series it's sort of similar. Basically they leave a wise open receiver with no threat to cover. Stanford's qb does a pre snap read knows where he's going with the ball. With a LB spread out he's more of a threat to the qb. It's not a tough defense to play against. To Lakes credit he fixed some of this throughout the game
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,218 Founders Club
    HuskyJW said:

    Huskies are winning out

    HTH

    Oregon will run for 200+ yards. But there's still a chance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Huskies are winning out

    HTH

    Oregon will run for 200+ yards. But there's still a chance.
    Oregon is still only the tallest midget in the PAC 12. UW’s secondary and Brown is an advantage for UW. The good news for Oregon is when Brown misses it doesn’t usually go to the other team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,400 Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Huskies are winning out

    HTH

    Oregon will run for 200+ yards. But there's still a chance.
    Oregon is still only the tallest midget in the PAC 12. UW’s secondary and Brown is an advantage for UW. The good news for Oregon is when Brown misses it doesn’t usually go to the other team.
    Brown isn't an advantage for UW. Have you seen how poorly the defense fares against mobile QBs? He doesn't even have to throw.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    chuck said:

    lawsandl said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Huskies are winning out

    HTH

    Oregon will run for 200+ yards. But there's still a chance.
    Oregon is still only the tallest midget in the PAC 12. UW’s secondary and Brown is an advantage for UW. The good news for Oregon is when Brown misses it doesn’t usually go to the other team.
    Brown isn't an advantage for UW. Have you seen how poorly the defense fares against mobile QBs? He doesn't even have to throw.
    Have you seen how he still does?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    This was Hiles second snap at Safety and he lined up and played incorrectly. This defense was a cover 0 full man. Hiles backpedals and looks into the backfield like he is playing zone safety.

    I didnt see any more egregious mistakes like this from him during live play.

    IMO Hiles looks good as a safety/nickel/striker and adds a ton more versatility to the defense. Should have been playing there from the start of the season. Hope he puts in the work I could see him playing like a Molden, Myles Bryant, or poor mans Buddha at the position.

    I still dont really get why he left Oklahoma though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,300
    DerekJohnson said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Huskies are winning out

    HTH

    Oregon will run for 300+ yards. But there's still a chance.
    fixed

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.