Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Some of us knew everything we were being told..
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern
starting in March 2020 would end up being being bullshit. But as of now it "too early to tell" if we can get together for Christmas.
The Most Important COVID Story of the Day
I’m sure most of my own readers are beginning to hear about this new study that finds no correlation between global and US COVID vaccination rates and the number of COVID cases. (Well . . . not if you’re only watching CNN or listening to NPR.) One of the authors is a Harvard-based researcher, so it must therefore necessarily be ignored by the MSM, so allow me to give a brief recounting of the study. I hope you will carefully read to the end.
Remember when CDC Director Rochelle Walensky promised, "Our data from the CDC suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus?” Remember when the CDC told us the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine "was 95.0% effective in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in persons without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection?” Yeah . . . I remember. Count those among either the biggest lies of this entire pandemic or as two of the biggest scientific research failures of all time. Maybe this is what happens when you rush pharmaceutical products to market without adequate, long-term studies across all age groups, but the bottomline is . . . we now know this has been a massive FAIL from our medical bureaucrats.
The title of the aforementioned study is, “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States,” and published by the European Journal of Epidemiology. (Link below.) For the study of the 68 countries, the researchers used Our World in Data for cross-country analysis. For the county-level analysis in the US, they utilized the actual White House COVID-19 Team data. (Catch that? They used data published by the WHITE HOUSE.)
I’m going to keep this simple, and directly quote from the study’s findings:
“At the country-level, there appears to be no discernible relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”
Read that last sentence again. It’s important, and requires no translation.
This line is a WHO bureaucrats’ ass-kicker:
“By comparison of Iceland and Portugal . . . Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
Ouch. Now, to US counties:
“Across the US counties too, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated. Notably there is also substantial county variation in new COVID-19 cases within categories of percentage population fully vaccinated. There also appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated.”
Here’s the CDC bureaucrats’ ass-kicking line:
“Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.”
Their concluding interpretation of these data is pure money:
“The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.”
“Emerging scientific evidence.” A similar phrase of which my loyal readers have heard me harp on over and over, and its importance at eventually dismantling the “narrative” to which these researchers also refer. The vaccine efficacy narrative is collapsing much faster than even I anticipated, but a collapse it is. Emerging data is proving two irrefutable arguments that I’ve consistently made since March of 2020:
1 - The government’s response to this virus has always been more political than scientific.
2 - The blockade and silencing of the scientific voices of those who were far ahead of what was being approved by the government, the MSM, and Big Tech has always been for the purpose of enforcing faux science-based control mechanisms on the world’s populations.
This study — and many others — now show us, conclusively, that mandatory vaccine passport requirements — whether by governmental decree or private business policy — are in no way based on real science. As Israel’s Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz was caught saying on a hot mic, “There is no medical or epidemiological justification for the Covid passport, it is only intended to pressure the unvaccinated to vaccinate.”
Data still implies the vaccines mitigate severity of illness, hospitalizations, and death among the elderly and those with certain pre-existing health conditions. They now completely negate the need for mandatory vaccine passports, as there is no evidence the vaccines inhibit the spread and infection of the disease at any greater rate than from those who are unvaccinated. Those who are vaccinated are at no greater risk when personally encountering an unvaccinated person, than they are from a fully-vaccinated person, and are -- by the numbers -- likely far less at risk from those who are unvaccinated and have acquired natural immunity from previous infection.
We can still win this battle if we get the word out. Keep and share this information as widely and frequently as possible. One-on-one with friends and family, and in all your social media feeds. The future of freedom itself depends upon it.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7
The Most Important COVID Story of the Day
I’m sure most of my own readers are beginning to hear about this new study that finds no correlation between global and US COVID vaccination rates and the number of COVID cases. (Well . . . not if you’re only watching CNN or listening to NPR.) One of the authors is a Harvard-based researcher, so it must therefore necessarily be ignored by the MSM, so allow me to give a brief recounting of the study. I hope you will carefully read to the end.
Remember when CDC Director Rochelle Walensky promised, "Our data from the CDC suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus?” Remember when the CDC told us the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine "was 95.0% effective in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in persons without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection?” Yeah . . . I remember. Count those among either the biggest lies of this entire pandemic or as two of the biggest scientific research failures of all time. Maybe this is what happens when you rush pharmaceutical products to market without adequate, long-term studies across all age groups, but the bottomline is . . . we now know this has been a massive FAIL from our medical bureaucrats.
The title of the aforementioned study is, “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States,” and published by the European Journal of Epidemiology. (Link below.) For the study of the 68 countries, the researchers used Our World in Data for cross-country analysis. For the county-level analysis in the US, they utilized the actual White House COVID-19 Team data. (Catch that? They used data published by the WHITE HOUSE.)
I’m going to keep this simple, and directly quote from the study’s findings:
“At the country-level, there appears to be no discernible relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”
Read that last sentence again. It’s important, and requires no translation.
This line is a WHO bureaucrats’ ass-kicker:
“By comparison of Iceland and Portugal . . . Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
Ouch. Now, to US counties:
“Across the US counties too, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated. Notably there is also substantial county variation in new COVID-19 cases within categories of percentage population fully vaccinated. There also appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated.”
Here’s the CDC bureaucrats’ ass-kicking line:
“Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.”
Their concluding interpretation of these data is pure money:
“The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.”
“Emerging scientific evidence.” A similar phrase of which my loyal readers have heard me harp on over and over, and its importance at eventually dismantling the “narrative” to which these researchers also refer. The vaccine efficacy narrative is collapsing much faster than even I anticipated, but a collapse it is. Emerging data is proving two irrefutable arguments that I’ve consistently made since March of 2020:
1 - The government’s response to this virus has always been more political than scientific.
2 - The blockade and silencing of the scientific voices of those who were far ahead of what was being approved by the government, the MSM, and Big Tech has always been for the purpose of enforcing faux science-based control mechanisms on the world’s populations.
This study — and many others — now show us, conclusively, that mandatory vaccine passport requirements — whether by governmental decree or private business policy — are in no way based on real science. As Israel’s Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz was caught saying on a hot mic, “There is no medical or epidemiological justification for the Covid passport, it is only intended to pressure the unvaccinated to vaccinate.”
Data still implies the vaccines mitigate severity of illness, hospitalizations, and death among the elderly and those with certain pre-existing health conditions. They now completely negate the need for mandatory vaccine passports, as there is no evidence the vaccines inhibit the spread and infection of the disease at any greater rate than from those who are unvaccinated. Those who are vaccinated are at no greater risk when personally encountering an unvaccinated person, than they are from a fully-vaccinated person, and are -- by the numbers -- likely far less at risk from those who are unvaccinated and have acquired natural immunity from previous infection.
We can still win this battle if we get the word out. Keep and share this information as widely and frequently as possible. One-on-one with friends and family, and in all your social media feeds. The future of freedom itself depends upon it.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7
Comments
I voted for Joe because he was going to lock down the virus not the people. He had a plan to whip the virus.
I'm a fucking retard
He was accused of failing to register as a sex offender on May 15, 2007 after moving into a new house in Cincinnati and a bench warrant was issued.[10] His agent, former NFL player Tim McGee, said Patterson's failure to register was "an oversight" after Patterson was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine on June 8.
On March 27, 2010, Patterson was arrested in Hamilton County, Ohio on DUI charges after it was found that his blood alcohol level was .117. On July 26, 2010, Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Bernie Bouchard sentenced him to a $500 fine and a three-day driving program. He also ordered Patterson not to consume alcohol for 18 months.[11]