You just have to love what economic illiterates leftists are.
Comments
-
Should would be a normative judgment. My comment was about what economic says actually will happen.Sources said:
No, no, no. Every board of every company in America is hopping on Zoom as we speak and agreeing that profits aren't important. That not only are they and all consumers "in this together", but Dazzler economics DEMAND that everyone should share the burden of inflationary cost increases, shareholders and bottom line be damned.PurpleThrobber said:
THIS is the dumbest thing the Dazzler has ever posted. And that is saying something.HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
Companies pass it on to the consumer.
Dumbass. Psaki dumbass level stupidity.
It’s called accounting.RoadTrip said:
I'm pretty sure nobody needs to take a single econ class to undertand this universal concept.greenblood said:
Share?HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
If a company has goals to maintain say 8% after tax margins, they are going to keep 8% after tax margins. Companies will continue their post tax margin, while consumers pay.
And maff.
Why do I always have to be the only smart one here? -
So it’s smart of you to make a prediction that isn’t coming true and was obvious to not be true but should have because of what you learned when you were 19? Got it. Good thing you’re good looking.HHusky said:
Should would be a normative judgment. My comment was about what economic says actually will happen.Sources said:
No, no, no. Every board of every company in America is hopping on Zoom as we speak and agreeing that profits aren't important. That not only are they and all consumers "in this together", but Dazzler economics DEMAND that everyone should share the burden of inflationary cost increases, shareholders and bottom line be damned.PurpleThrobber said:
THIS is the dumbest thing the Dazzler has ever posted. And that is saying something.HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
Companies pass it on to the consumer.
Dumbass. Psaki dumbass level stupidity.
It’s called accounting.RoadTrip said:
I'm pretty sure nobody needs to take a single econ class to undertand this universal concept.greenblood said:
Share?HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
If a company has goals to maintain say 8% after tax margins, they are going to keep 8% after tax margins. Companies will continue their post tax margin, while consumers pay.
And maff.
Why do I always have to be the only smart one here? -
What economic says? Yeah, you're the smart one.HHusky said:
Should would be a normative judgment. My comment was about what economic says actually will happen.Sources said:
No, no, no. Every board of every company in America is hopping on Zoom as we speak and agreeing that profits aren't important. That not only are they and all consumers "in this together", but Dazzler economics DEMAND that everyone should share the burden of inflationary cost increases, shareholders and bottom line be damned.PurpleThrobber said:
THIS is the dumbest thing the Dazzler has ever posted. And that is saying something.HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
Companies pass it on to the consumer.
Dumbass. Psaki dumbass level stupidity.
It’s called accounting.RoadTrip said:
I'm pretty sure nobody needs to take a single econ class to undertand this universal concept.greenblood said:
Share?HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
If a company has goals to maintain say 8% after tax margins, they are going to keep 8% after tax margins. Companies will continue their post tax margin, while consumers pay.
And maff.
Why do I always have to be the only smart one here? -
Hey Dazzler, if you are so fabulously wealthy why are you still fleecing seniors out of their retirement accounts?
Shouldn't you be enjoying life in exotic locations around the world?
Why are you working at all?
-
Simple answer: He’s a lawyer. He enjoys spreading misery and getting more ignorant (politically) with each passing year.
The Dazzler is old enough to collect social security. -
You forgot his MBA from UW . . .Bob_C said:
So it’s smart of you to make a prediction that isn’t coming true and was obvious to not be true but should have because of what you learned when you were 19? Got it. Good thing you’re good looking.HHusky said:
Should would be a normative judgment. My comment was about what economic says actually will happen.Sources said:
No, no, no. Every board of every company in America is hopping on Zoom as we speak and agreeing that profits aren't important. That not only are they and all consumers "in this together", but Dazzler economics DEMAND that everyone should share the burden of inflationary cost increases, shareholders and bottom line be damned.PurpleThrobber said:
THIS is the dumbest thing the Dazzler has ever posted. And that is saying something.HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
Companies pass it on to the consumer.
Dumbass. Psaki dumbass level stupidity.
It’s called accounting.RoadTrip said:
I'm pretty sure nobody needs to take a single econ class to undertand this universal concept.greenblood said:
Share?HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
If a company has goals to maintain say 8% after tax margins, they are going to keep 8% after tax margins. Companies will continue their post tax margin, while consumers pay.
And maff.
Why do I always have to be the only smart one here? -
Unintended consequences says what?HHusky said:Ask me how I know most of you girls never took econ--or at least didn't pass.
-
HHusky said:
Should would be a normative judgment. My comment was about what economic says actually will happen.Sources said:
No, no, no. Every board of every company in America is hopping on Zoom as we speak and agreeing that profits aren't important. That not only are they and all consumers "in this together", but Dazzler economics DEMAND that everyone should share the burden of inflationary cost increases, shareholders and bottom line be damned.PurpleThrobber said:
THIS is the dumbest thing the Dazzler has ever posted. And that is saying something.HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
Companies pass it on to the consumer.
Dumbass. Psaki dumbass level stupidity.
It’s called accounting.RoadTrip said:
I'm pretty sure nobody needs to take a single econ class to undertand this universal concept.greenblood said:
Share?HHusky said:Companies and consumers will each bear a share of the increase. Psaki didn’t take econ, I guess. But neither did most of the bored.
If a company has goals to maintain say 8% after tax margins, they are going to keep 8% after tax margins. Companies will continue their post tax margin, while consumers pay.
And maff.
Why do I always have to be the only smart one here?
