Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
United States can't stand up to the cartels and the Taliban
Comments
-
Trump killed them. HTHHHusky said: -
-
“Operation Allies Refuge”:
Number of troops deployed to Afghanistan to evacuate personnel safely: 5,000;
Number of U.S. troops in country when withdrawal announced in April 2021: 2,500.
CNN’s White House Reporter:
“Biden’s hands were tied (by Trump) . . .” -
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad. -
Physical evidence (DNA). “I don’t know.”
Translation: If it interferes with my strong feelings, I don’t care. -
Even I can't imagine this level of stupid but Obama is the voice in his ear!
-
We know there was a confrontation at the car, lady. Your question went a lot further than that .trublue said:Physical evidence (DNA). “I don’t know.”
Translation: If it interferes with my strong feelings, I don’t care. -
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad. -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/ordered-trump-us-down-2500-troops-afghanistan?amptrublue said:“Operation Allies Refuge”:
Number of troops deployed to Afghanistan to evacuate personnel safely: 5,000;
Number of U.S. troops in country when withdrawal announced in April 2021: 2,500.
CNN’s White House Reporter:
“Biden’s hands were tied (by Trump) . . .”
January 15, 2021
You got a little orange on your chin. -
Ever heard of physical evidence, e.g., DNA, blood, dumbfuck?HHusky said:
The “witness” was the survivor of the confrontation. You lie so easily.Bendintheriver said:
To hell with the eyewitnesses who testified that the thug was the aggressor, actually stuck his head in the window of a police car and tried to pull the gun from a police officers belt.HHusky said:
I get it. Poking holes in your arguments is too "disingenuous".trublue said:LOL . . . You have?
Your one line snarky responses are legendary.
You have a problem admitting when you’re wrong and full of shit.
Our lengthy dialogue regarding the death of Michael Brown, the rioting in Ferguson, MO and the alleged culpability of (former) Officer Darrin Wilson is Exhibit 1.
I disagreed with you about the Michael Brown case. Still do. But I don't think you should admit you're wrong about it, because there are facts we can both point to to support our respective opinions. I don't think your opinion is batshit crazy. I just think it's a selective and inadequate processing of the available information.
Similarly, I think that Stalin's belief that China would be any less aggressive if Daddy was President is belied by lots of examples of how little support our allies could expect from Daddy. But I wouldn't ask him to admit he's wrong about something that cannot be proven or disproven. Stalin hid behind a the word "disingenuous" when I correctly understood his position. He didn't want a dialogue; to say he did was . . . disingenuous.
Know what there aren't any facts to support? That the 2020 Presidential election was tainted by widespread fraud that flipped the election to Biden. That Covid restrictions are part of a large scale authoritarian plot for the enslavement of the population. That George Soros is the evil puppet master controlling the world. That the Clintons have been systematically having people murdered for the past 30 years. If you believe any of those things, you merit being made fun of.
Jeezus, party over proof. Sad.
Take the L . . .
