Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Listen to Black Parents Furious With Critical Race Theory

hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344


There's something for everyone to read in this. Especially the smugtards that insist that critical race theory isn't being taught in schools.

This is the sad truth:

Both parties have failed Black Americans.

It's time for Black Americans to realize that their skin color is not a barrier to their progress. More importantly, they must begin to force both the Democrats as well as Republicans to earn their support.
«1

Comments

  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    CRT Experts Agree you, as a black child, got no shot. In anything. It’s over. Don’t fight it.

    We will keep lecturing you on this, indoctrinating you with cartoon classroom videos and assigning homework until you submit to the education.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,783 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    CRT Experts Agree you, as a black child, got no shot. In anything. It’s over. Don’t fight it.**

    We will keep lecturing you on this, indoctrinating you with cartoon classroom videos and assigning homework until you submit to the education.

    ** unless you gots mad hops and can bury the J.

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    doogie said:

    CRT Experts Agree you, as a black child, got no shot. In anything. It’s over. Don’t fight it.**

    We will keep lecturing you on this, indoctrinating you with cartoon classroom videos and assigning homework until you submit to the education.

    ** unless you gots mad hops and can bury the J.

    Or are a hell of dancer.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,783 Standard Supporter

    doogie said:

    CRT Experts Agree you, as a black child, got no shot. In anything. It’s over. Don’t fight it.**

    We will keep lecturing you on this, indoctrinating you with cartoon classroom videos and assigning homework until you submit to the education.

    ** unless you gots mad hops and can bury the J.

    Or are a hell of dancer.
    @BrunoMarsDawg, true?
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    All of this goes against most of everything King stood for.

    Why is it not being mentioned much?
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I’m hearing all civil rights icons, that are dead and cannot speak for themselves, would be republicans now.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    I’m hearing all civil rights icons, that are dead and cannot speak for themselves, would be republicans now.

    John Lennon was a Reagan fan.
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    I’m hearing all civil rights icons, that are dead and cannot speak for themselves, would be republicans now.

    This coming from the guy that tried to tell us the MLK was a communist. Nice try, tardkins. Also, sounds like you need to go The School For Kids Who Can't Read Good:

    Both parties have failed Black Americans.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I let MLK speak for himself.

    “I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic… [Capitalism] started out with a noble and high motive… but like most human systems it fell victim to the very thing it was revolting against. So today capitalism has out-lived its usefulness.”
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    I let MLK speak for himself.

    “I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic… [Capitalism] started out with a noble and high motive… but like most human systems it fell victim to the very thing it was revolting against. So today capitalism has out-lived its usefulness.”

    Silly little boy, we've already been over this.

    Just months after the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, it is worth remembering that King explicitly denounced Communism.

    “During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto,” he wrote. “I also read some interpretative works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.”

    Then King listed the three reasons he could never accept Marxism.

    “First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularistic and materialistic, has no place for God,” he wrote.

    Marx’s theory of “dialectical materialism” (and the conjoined theory of “historical materialism”) instead envisioned the human race as a one-dimensional economic creature.

    “Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything – force, violence murder, lying – is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end,” he wrote.

    The second point, closely related to the first, recognizes that anyone who rejects transcendence and revelation must, by extension, deny any universally binding morality. The world then becomes a patchwork of competing moralities, begging the strong to impose their will upon the weak. King consistently disowned those who spoke of prevailing in their political cause “by any means necessary.”

    “Third, I opposed communism’s political totalitarianism. In communism, the individual ends up in subjection to the state. … And if man’s so-called rights and liberties stand in the way of that end, they are simply swept aside,” King wrote. “His liberties of expression, his freedom to vote, his freedom to listen to what news he likes or to choose his books are all restricted.”

    “Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state,” King concluded.

    I also let him speak for himself.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter

    I’m hearing all civil rights icons, that are dead and cannot speak for themselves, would be republicans now.

    They were all killed by Democrats, of course. But never mind that little historical nugget.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    "The purpose of Socialism is Communism" - Vladimir Lenin.

    Since were letting the dead speak for themselves.
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited June 2021

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    Glad that you realize what a disaster communism is. I would suggest that you travel a little bit and go to some of those places. Talk to anyone who has left a socialist country. It's a disastrous ideology. Also interesting to hear you have 'room for christians' I don't think I've ever seen a group that hates christians more than progressives.
    Utopia is dumb. If you have a real policy or solution, I would like to hear it. How do you feel about progressive policies in cities in America? There is a distinct lack of policy analysis. What would happen if we just let people shoplift and steal things? What will happen if we just ditch advanced math classes or get rid of tests and promote people based on their skin color? I'm interested in making things better, for sure. But I don't see anything good coming from woke white people with zero practical experience and who are not willing to have their ideas challenged.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    You've been pretty clear about your disdain towards Christians. Utopia is dumb. If you have a real policy or solution, I would like to hear it. How do you feel about how progressive policies in cities in America? There is a distinct lack of policy analysis. What would happen if we just let people shoplift and steal things? What will happen if we just ditch advanced math classes or get rid of tests and promote people based on their skin color? I'm interested in making things better, for sure. But I don't see anything good coming from woke white people with zero practical experience and who are not willing to have their ideas challenged.
    You can literally smell the fear in @TheKobeStopper's poasts.

    He's afraid he can't provide the life for himself that he wants and/or grew up with. That's Young American Socialism in a nutshell.
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    Narrator voice over: they all eventually resemble the USSR. If they don’t it’s only because they fail before reaching that stage.
    Exactly. Letting workers own the means of production. Sounds simple. How does that happen?
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    What about the bespectacled?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    Narrator voice over: they all eventually resemble the USSR. If they don’t it’s only because they fail before reaching that stage.
    Exactly. Letting workers own the means of production. Sounds simple. How does that happen?
    Why not just move every U.S. factory to China right now? JFC.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter

    His criticisms are pretty spot on for “communist” states like the USSR but, as I’ve stated many times, I wouldn’t support anything that remotely resembled that.

    I find it hard to believe that workers owning the means of production goes against Christianity but his fear of secularism is predictable. Plenty of room for Christians in my utopia.

    A totalitarian state is not necessary.
    https://www.nceo.org/articles/employee-ownership-100
Sign In or Register to comment.