Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Exageration? The pressure would be immense and it would cause excess airflow. There are questions about the entire event including the 3rd building coming down and the Pentagon but declaring it something our government knew about, planned and executed is just a bit of a reach although I am skeptical about everything we're told.
Article talks about the history of white racism and how minorities don't feel welcome in the state and national forests. For some reason, it is important to talk about hundred year old sundowner laws in which it was illegal for blacks to be out after dark. What wasn't mentioned for some reason was how wandering around in the national forests in southern Oregon can be dangerous for anyone who isn't a Mexican cartel drug grower.
How are they not embarrassed at declaring themselves to all being giant pussies?
Article talks about the history of white racism and how minorities don't feel welcome in the state and national forests. For some reason, it is important to talk about hundred year old sundowner laws in which it was illegal for blacks to be out after dark. What wasn't mentioned for some reason was how wandering around in the national forests in southern Oregon can be dangerous for anyone who isn't a Mexican cartel drug grower.
How are they not embarrassed at declaring themselves to all being giant pussies?
Pacific Crest Trail at night or South Central?
Both are Racial Jungles, according to our "President," no?
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Imagine never questioning a word the establishment media says.
Imagine critical thinking.
Imagine shouting up to your two dads with glee, “I’m a fucking idiot!”
I am not debating the plumes of smoke ostensibly from falling floors. Completely reasonable.
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Imagine never questioning a word the establishment media says.
Imagine critical thinking.
Imagine shouting up to your two dads with glee, “I’m a fucking idiot!”
I am not debating the plumes of smoke ostensibly from falling floors. Completely reasonable.
The government sought to stay the injunction, but then couldn't cite any examples of the "grave harm" they allege the ruling will cause. The government is just like the Tug leftards, devoid of examples, just a wad of feelings.
Judge Denies Biden Administration's Motion to Stay His Injunction, Which Prohibits Biden's Censors From Contacting Social Media Companies to Urge or Pressure Them Into Censoring Protected Speech —Lamont the Big Dummy Boy when you put it like that, it's hard to see how the Biden Administration isn't just demanding the right to censor enemies' speech. ===== Defendants now seek to stay the preliminary injunction, claiming that the injunction "may" cause "grave harm" by "prevent[ing] the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct." Doc. 297-1, at 1. But, after months of searching on this very issue, Defendants do not identify a single specific example of supposedly "grave harm" that the injunction might cause, or a single specific example of "lawful and responsible" government conduct that the injunction prevents. See id. at 1-6. By its plain terms, the injunction permits Defendants to engage in the full range of permissible Government speech and conduct--such as "(1) informing social-media companies of postings involving criminal activity or criminal conspiracies;" "(2) contacting and/or notifying social-media companies of national security threats, extortion, or other threats posted on its platform;" "(3) contacting and/or notifying social- media companies about criminal efforts to suppress voting, to provide illegal campaign contributions, of cyber-attacks against election infrastructure, or foreign attempts to influence elections;" "(4) informing social-media companies of threats that threaten the public safety or security of the United States;" and "(5) exercising permissible public government speech promoting government policies or views on matters of public concern," among others. Doc. 294, at 5-6.
In the face of these clear and specific authorizations, Defendants' conclusory speculative assertion of "grave harm" that the injunction "may be read" to cause, Doc. 297-1, at 1--devoid of any specific examples or evidence of such harm--does not warrant an extraordinary stay.
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Are you as consistent with criticizing Conspiritards like, say, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, for goading the Western World into attacking Iraq for non-existent WMDs that would be discovered as a Mushroom Cloud somewhere in the Western world? Let's be careful about who and what we criticize, shall we?
Have you forgotten the name "Ahmed Chalabi" and the Iraqi National Congress? Or is that just more Conspiratard stuff?
Best flight of my life was AA Dallas/FW to Miami on a Friday morning. Nothing but hot 30-something MILFs headed for a weekend of "shopping." Sat next to two hot mamas sporting at least 36Ds in plunging necklines. Glad I wasn't around to see them get drunk and mount a Cuban BBC in South Beach, but it did make me long for my former Texas GF whose blowies were unmatched in Seattle.
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Are you as consistent with criticizing Conspiritards like, say, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, for goading the Western World into attacking Iraq for non-existent WMDs that would be discovered as a Mushroom Cloud somewhere in the Western world? Let's be careful about who and what we criticize, shall we?
Have you forgotten the name "Ahmed Chalabi" and the Iraqi National Congress? Or is that just more Conspiratard stuff?
Imagine being “shot” down 4 flights of stairs in a collapsing building and living to tell the story.
Imagine being a Conspiratard and being proud of it. My favorite Conspiratards of 9-11 fame were those two probably 19 y/o dudes who tried to convince the world that it was an inside job by breaking down the video. You're in fine company Pawz.
Are you as consistent with criticizing Conspiritards like, say, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, for goading the Western World into attacking Iraq for non-existent WMDs that would be discovered as a Mushroom Cloud somewhere in the Western world? Let's be careful about who and what we criticize, shall we?
Have you forgotten the name "Ahmed Chalabi" and the Iraqi National Congress? Or is that just more Conspiratard stuff?
You must be gnu.
You are NOT allowed to ask questions.
Especially uncomfortable questions.
46Quook has a narrative in existential crisis.
CAB caught the TDS and it's been downhill for him ever since. His opinions and feelings are widely shared by the post-Trump crowd, which is fine, but also embraces the egregious wrongs of the past 7 years without penalty or accountability.
Anyone who thinks Democracy can be "saved" by ignoring what the media, big tech, big Pharma and big Global Trade did to a sitting President and the will of the U.S. pubic who elected Trump to stop and protest what they were doing wrong and fucking over the country by doing, is naive and superficial, at best. What Trump stood for needs to be reckoned with, whether he's in the Oval Office, or not.
Comments
Imagine critical thinking.
Imagine shouting up to your two dads with glee, “I’m a fucking idiot!”
I am not debating the plumes of smoke ostensibly from falling floors. Completely reasonable.
I chortled hard at that one.
Conspiratard.
LOL…..
https://ace.mu.nu/
Judge Denies Biden Administration's Motion to Stay His Injunction, Which Prohibits Biden's Censors From Contacting Social Media Companies to Urge or Pressure Them Into Censoring Protected Speech
—Lamont the Big Dummy
Boy when you put it like that, it's hard to see how the Biden Administration isn't just demanding the right to censor enemies' speech.
=====
Defendants now seek to stay the preliminary injunction, claiming that the injunction "may" cause "grave harm" by "prevent[ing] the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct." Doc. 297-1, at 1. But, after months of searching on this very issue, Defendants do not identify a single specific example of supposedly "grave harm" that the injunction might cause, or a single specific example of "lawful and responsible" government conduct that the injunction prevents. See id. at 1-6. By its plain terms, the injunction permits Defendants to engage in the full range of permissible Government speech and conduct--such as "(1) informing social-media companies of postings involving criminal activity or criminal conspiracies;" "(2) contacting and/or notifying social-media companies of national security threats, extortion, or other threats posted on its platform;" "(3) contacting and/or notifying social- media companies about criminal efforts to suppress voting, to provide illegal campaign contributions, of cyber-attacks against election infrastructure, or foreign attempts to influence elections;" "(4) informing social-media companies of threats that threaten the public safety or security of the United States;" and "(5) exercising permissible public government speech promoting government policies or views on matters of public concern," among others. Doc. 294,
at 5-6.
In the face of these clear and specific authorizations, Defendants' conclusory speculative assertion of "grave harm" that the injunction "may be read" to cause, Doc. 297-1, at 1--devoid of any specific examples or evidence of such harm--does not warrant an extraordinary stay.
Dilbert Goes Off
Have you forgotten the name "Ahmed Chalabi" and the Iraqi National Congress? Or is that just more Conspiratard stuff?
No offense, Creep.
You are NOT allowed to ask questions.
Especially uncomfortable questions.
46Quook has a narrative in existential crisis.
Anyone who thinks Democracy can be "saved" by ignoring what the media, big tech, big Pharma and big Global Trade did to a sitting President and the will of the U.S. pubic who elected Trump to stop and protest what they were doing wrong and fucking over the country by doing, is naive and superficial, at best. What Trump stood for needs to be reckoned with, whether he's in the Oval Office, or not.