Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We need a general tweet of the day thread

1113911401142114411451982

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I guess being late four or five times a month to a time clock type job is okay. It's racist to expect blacks to be on time, or something.

    It’s slightly more likely that you’ve received a highly selective version of the facts and evidence.
    Hey Dazzler: How about you STFU unless you have, you know, FACTS to share.

    I heard Lawyers like FACTS.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I guess being late four or five times a month to a time clock type job is okay. It's racist to expect blacks to be on time, or something.

    It’s slightly more likely that you’ve received a highly selective version of the facts and evidence.
    Being that tardy alone is grounds for termination at many jobs.
    You have no curiosity about why a jury of ordinary Americans would be so pissed off at the Defendant that they awarded $10 million in punitives, of course.
    Enlighten me genius
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I guess being late four or five times a month to a time clock type job is okay. It's racist to expect blacks to be on time, or something.

    It’s slightly more likely that you’ve received a highly selective version of the facts and evidence.
    Being that tardy alone is grounds for termination at many jobs.
    You have no curiosity about why a jury of ordinary Americans would be so pissed off at the Defendant that they awarded $10 million in punitives, of course.
    Enlighten me genius
    The retaliation allegedly came in the form of being cited for lateness. Europe didn't deny she came in late, but noted that other workers frequently did the same and weren't reprimanded. Her lawsuit claimed she "was never late for a training appointment with a client, never kept a client waiting, and regularly stayed an hour or more past the end of her shift regardless of what time she had arrived."

    The man who allegedly made the sexist and racist comments was among those who "regularly arrived at work well after their official start-times without consequence." The lawsuit also claimed that the employee "often left work early without repercussion."

    That prompted Europe to believe she "was being singled out for selective enforcement of time and attendance policies in retaliation for having engaged in legally protected activities," the lawsuit claimed.

    Just months after she complained about the club's toxic work environment, Equinox fired her, citing her lateness as its reason, the claim says.

    The trial included "swipe-in data" from other Equinox workers that showed that other managers had worse time and attendance records than Europe, although she was the only worker who was disciplined, her attorney stated.

    In addition to the $10 million in punitive damages, the jury awarded Europe $1.25 million in compensatory damages and $16,000 in economic damages representing back pay.


    Incidentally, Equinox was also found to have engaged in spoilation of evidence.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    Allegedly.....Allegedly....Claimed......Claim...Her Attorney (not a witness) stated

    Brutal Facts, Dazzler. Just brutal.

    I suppose I can look up the actual Findings of Fact on my own.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,332

    Allegedly.....Allegedly....Claimed......Claim...Her Attorney (not a witness) stated

    Brutal Facts, Dazzler. Just brutal.

    I suppose I can look up the actual Findings of Fact on my own.

    The plaintiff won, Madam. The jury is the finder of fact.

    Got civics?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Allegedly.....Allegedly....Claimed......Claim...Her Attorney (not a witness) stated

    Brutal Facts, Dazzler. Just brutal.

    I suppose I can look up the actual Findings of Fact on my own.

    The plaintiff won, Madam. The jury is the finder of fact.

    Got civics?
    A jury found OJ not guilty.

    You’re such a clown.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Allegedly.....Allegedly....Claimed......Claim...Her Attorney (not a witness) stated

    Brutal Facts, Dazzler. Just brutal.

    I suppose I can look up the actual Findings of Fact on my own.

    The plaintiff won, Madam. The jury is the finder of fact.

    Got civics?
    And what were their actual findings?

    Practice Law?