Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it.
Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it. Nothing nasty about it. In the spirit of our founding principles, it provides protection of the minority from the majority.
Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it. Nothing nasty about it. In the spirit of our founding principles, it provides protection of the minority from the majority. Yeah, nasty was the wrong word. Frustrating would be more apt.
Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it. Nothing nasty about it. In the spirit of our founding principles, it provides protection of the minority from the majority. The 2A is the protection.The filibuster is just the warning.
Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it. Nothing nasty about it. In the spirit of our founding principles, it provides protection of the minority from the majority. The 2A is the protection.The filibuster is just the warning. Not really. The South went the 2A route and it ended badly (for them). They could have just fought a delaying action in the Senate and kept their peculiar institution for another 30 or 40 years. The ballot is stronger than the bullet as Honest Abe once said.
Nasty as it can be, I've always been in favor of keeping it. Nothing nasty about it. In the spirit of our founding principles, it provides protection of the minority from the majority. The 2A is the protection.The filibuster is just the warning. Not really. The South went the 2A route and it ended badly (for them). They could have just fought a delaying action in the Senate and kept their peculiar institution for another 30 or 40 years. The ballot is stronger than the bullet as Honest Abe once said. The Brits disagree.
It is absolutely essential, and was created SPECIFICALLY for terms where a single party held everything by narrow margins.Sorry, bitches. You’ll have to dust off budget reconciliation again, like you did for the ACA.
