Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Influx facility update

2

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Again I’d like her to dig in with Joe-is-human -rights-criminal but that’s expecting too much. Good for her.

    ATBS,AOCGFY
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    There are kids on the border separated from their parents tonight in facilities Trump had closed.. Kids that are housed in shipping containers. But that’s OK now because the insane Left got their election.

    How fucking brainwashed does someone have to be to support this Rat hypocrisy?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Again I’d like her to dig in with Joe-is-human -rights-criminal but that’s expecting too much. Good for her.

    ATBS,AOCGFY
    I already know the Trumper comments are going to come in hot on this but I’m going to post it anyways because I’d be interested in what you think of my take on this.

    Sometimes AOC is going to vote for Nancy Pelosi, sometimes she’s going to be weak rhetorically against Biden when she was very strong against Trump. But as long as the positions and goals aren’t changing to things I don’t support, then I view these as strategic choices. And while it’s not the way I would do things, I’ve also never won an election.

    So I want to see what this timeline looks like. Is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, we’re fixing it? Or is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, maybe they’re not so bad? If it’s the latter, I would expect a big strategic change from the left and if the former it’s like alright they’re libs, they’re gonna fuck up but they fixed it.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,255 Founders Club

    Again I’d like her to dig in with Joe-is-human -rights-criminal but that’s expecting too much. Good for her.

    ATBS,AOCGFY
    I already know the Trumper comments are going to come in hot on this but I’m going to post it anyways because I’d be interested in what you think of my take on this.

    Sometimes AOC is going to vote for Nancy Pelosi, sometimes she’s going to be weak rhetorically against Biden when she was very strong against Trump. But as long as the positions and goals aren’t changing to things I don’t support, then I view these as strategic choices. And while it’s not the way I would do things, I’ve also never won an election.

    So I want to see what this timeline looks like. Is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, we’re fixing it? Or is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, maybe they’re not so bad? If it’s the latter, I would expect a big strategic change from the left and if the former it’s like alright they’re libs, they’re gonna fuck up but they fixed it.
    I recall she made the statement that all house candidates that supported Medicare for all won, or something to that effect. Seems like it would have been a no brainer to push Nancy for a vote on it in exchange for speaker votes. That would have been strategic.

    Would like to see her and Bernie actually put their necks out there and write bills and push for votes on their policies. Don’t do that and you are just establishment.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,504 Founders Club

    Again I’d like her to dig in with Joe-is-human -rights-criminal but that’s expecting too much. Good for her.

    ATBS,AOCGFY
    I already know the Trumper comments are going to come in hot on this but I’m going to post it anyways because I’d be interested in what you think of my take on this.

    Sometimes AOC is going to vote for Nancy Pelosi, sometimes she’s going to be weak rhetorically against Biden when she was very strong against Trump. But as long as the positions and goals aren’t changing to things I don’t support, then I view these as strategic choices. And while it’s not the way I would do things, I’ve also never won an election.

    So I want to see what this timeline looks like. Is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, we’re fixing it? Or is it, we had an influx, we had to open these, maybe they’re not so bad? If it’s the latter, I would expect a big strategic change from the left and if the former it’s like alright they’re libs, they’re gonna fuck up but they fixed it.
    You talk about trumper comments and think we're brain dead followers while you allow yourself a nice helping of hypocrisy error nuance on your views.

    Trump stopped children being held in Obama cages by stopping them from coming by eliminating the lure.

    You didn't wait one second to see that actually work. Now you're mr patience


    In other words you don't give a shit about the kids. You only care about your leader

    Heal your fucking self
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Just to be clear, I’m not even going to read your responses on this. I do not care what you think. I’d be interested in what grundle thinks, not you idiots.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676

    Just to be clear, I’m not even going to read your responses on this. I do not care what you think. I’d be interested in what grundle thinks, not you idiots.

    You sound scared
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,504 Founders Club

    Just to be clear, I’m not even going to read your responses on this. I do not care what you think. I’d be interested in what grundle thinks, not you idiots.

    Someone scurred