Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who’s up for a trip to Cancun?
Comments
-
Fake but Twitter allows it because it harms a conservative.BennyBeaver said:
Nice job, dumbasses who believed it. -
greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4dxQ9o9TWs
This is pretty well Oct thru March in E. Washington/Northern Idaho.
Haven't seen any offers to pay to put the power lines underground.
-
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
-
i have zero problems with nuclearGrundleStiltzkin said:
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
-
The problem is that we aren't. So why pretend that renewables are a complete solution which is what is taught in school, what is preached by the green gaia nude green deal religionists. It's just math and science that you need to have sufficient baseload generation or you are going to get blackouts. I would recommend a hundred year solution and if not, then I would explain what happens if you get such an event. In Oregon, tough to get a loan to build unless you are above the hundred year flood level.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky. -
Cuz your smartWilburHooksHands said:
i have zero problems with nuclearGrundleStiltzkin said:
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky. -
He just votes for people who do have a problem with it.WilburHooksHands said:
i have zero problems with nuclearGrundleStiltzkin said:
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky. -
I agree its way more complicated than many make it out to be. I still think its something to strive for.WestlinnDuck said:
The problem is that we aren't. So why pretend that renewables are a complete solution which is what is taught in school, what is preached by the green gaia nude green deal religionists. It's just math and science that you need to have sufficient baseload generation or you are going to get blackouts. I would recommend a hundred year solution and if not, then I would explain what happens if you get such an event. In Oregon, tough to get a loan to build unless you are above the hundred year flood level.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky. -
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Cuz your smartWilburHooksHands said:
i have zero problems with nuclearGrundleStiltzkin said:
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
-
Please tell me what candidates are backing nuclear?SFGbob said:
He just votes for people who do have a problem with it.WilburHooksHands said:
i have zero problems with nuclearGrundleStiltzkin said:
If you like human prosperity and a clean environment, split baby split.WilburHooksHands said:
Not if done properly. If we really wanted to implement renewalables correctly and effectively over time, we could. The money and politics will always get in the way though.WestlinnDuck said:You remember a
It's not routine. Not routine in Texas either. But as we ramp up renewables, it will become a more common occurrence.HHusky said:
No water, heat or power is routine in the Midwest?greenblood said:
This isn’t any different than what the Dakota’s, and the rest of the Midwest deal with on an annual basis. But your bleeding heart is duly noted. It’s also cute that you think this is a lot of money. I’m sure a PAC or two distributed most of those funds to sucker knobs like you into thinking you’re part of a movement. Your gullibility is pretty pathetic.TheKobeStopper said:
I means there’s things he could be doing...greenblood said:There isn’t much he can do, but it’s still a terrible look. Especially from a guy who barely beat an anti gun candidate in Texas of all places.
Almost makes Seattle seem less sucky.
