Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

The hard truth about batteries.

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,970
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
Standard Supporter
Since its being run by the chicoms, leftards aren't concerned with any morality concerning the environmental or human devastation of mining for lithium or cobalt. Good times.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/01/who-will-tell-the-greens-there-is-no-battery-fairy.php

WHO WILL TELL THE GREENS THERE IS NO BATTERY FAIRY?
For the longest while I have been asking, “Where do environmentalists and Democrats think all these batteries for our oil-free transportation fleet are going to come from?” It seems they think there is a Battery Fairy out there somewhere who will magically supply the ginormous battery capacity, and additional supply of electricity to charge them, in order to deliver us to our blessed fossil-fuel-free future.

So kudos to Wired magazine on “The Spiraling Environmental Cost of our Lithium Battery Addiction,” which reminds us that there are, you know, tradeoffs between various kinds of energy systems we might use:

Demand for lithium is increasing exponentially, and it doubled in price between 2016 and 2018. According to consultancy Cairn Energy Research Advisors, the lithium ion industry is expected to grow from 100 gigawatt hours (GWh) of annual production in 2017, to almost 800 GWhs in 2027. . .

But there’s a problem. As the world scrambles to replace fossil fuels with clean energy, the environmental impact of finding all the lithium required to enable that transformation could become a serious issue in its own right. “One of the biggest environmental problems caused by our endless hunger for the latest and smartest devices is a growing mineral crisis, particularly those needed to make our batteries,” says Christina Valimaki an analyst at Elsevier. . .

It’s a relatively cheap and effective process, but it uses a lot of water – approximately 500,000 gallons per tonne of lithium. In Chile’s Salar de Atacama, mining activities consumed 65 per cent of the region’s water. That is having a big impact on local farmers – who grow quinoa and herd llamas – in an area where some communities already have to get water driven in from elsewhere. . .

Two other key ingredients, cobalt and nickel, are more in danger of creating a bottleneck in the move towards electric vehicles, and at a potentially huge environmental cost. Cobalt is found in huge quantities right across the Democratic Republic of Congo and central Africa, and hardly anywhere else. The price has quadrupled in the last two years.

There’s lots more in the whole article, including the problem of disposal or recycling of used batteries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcJ8me22NVs&feature=emb_logo
«1

Comments

  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited January 2021
    I've been trying to make this point with my greener friends and family for the last couple years, but they are so fucking programmed and brainwashed into out-of-sight, out-of-mind consumerism and TDS, their brains are impenetrable.

    It's really become a Two Legs Bad, Four Legs Good situation.

    "mining activities consumed 65 per cent of the region’s water. That is having a big impact on local farmers – who grow quinoa and herd llamas – in an area where some communities already have to get water driven in from elsewhere. . ."

    What could ever go wrong?
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Economy of scale, manufacturing and transport, and disposal of waste don't factor into unicorn thinking

    Unless it’s nuclear. That, you know, actually works.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,970
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    Economy of scale, manufacturing and transport, and disposal of waste don't factor into unicorn thinking

    Unless it’s nuclear. That, you know, actually works.
    Imagine a reliable energy source that provides power 24/7 with no CO2 emissions. Works at night and when the wind doesn't blow. Almost like magic.
  • Options
    TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,753
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Economy of scale, manufacturing and transport, and disposal of waste don't factor into unicorn thinking

    Unless it’s nuclear. That, you know, actually works.
    Imagine a reliable energy source that provides power 24/7 with no CO2 emissions. Works at night and when the wind doesn't blow. Almost like magic.
    But it's so scary. And comes with no trigger warnings.
  • Options
    LebamDawgLebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,551
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam

    The best battery is a hydro dam. Simple fact. Also best solar power vector.

    but a couple of fish died
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
    “Climate change isn’t real”

    “Well ok of course the climate is changing but it’s not man made”

    “Well ok it’s real but the effects won’t be that bad”

    The is some insight into why no one gives a fuck what you have to say. You’re welcome.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,564
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,970
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    Ironic

    It's almost like the KobeSlobberer doesn't understand basic science. True believers would support nukes and fracking and exporting LNG to the chicoms as actual energy solutions that reduced CO2 emissions. But that doesn't punish America for its sins. So, plan B requires suffering.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,917
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Ironic

    It's almost like the KobeSlobberer doesn't understand basic science. True believers would support nukes and fracking and exporting LNG to the chicoms as actual energy solutions that reduced CO2 emissions. But that doesn't punish America for its sins. So, plan B requires suffering.
    The leftists are crabs pulling the innovators back into their boiling water.

    God forbid there could be true abundance - where the energy needs to the ChiComs could be supplied while reducing C02 emissions in the timeframe it takes for the smarty US engineers to figure out alternative sources at a reasonable price.

    BTW, lithium is already becoming outdated battery storage technology. Hydrogen will be the next gen.

  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,970
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    World wheat production up 10% in the last 10 years. I was told 10 years ago that global warming was going to leave the world as a food desert. Interesting that CO2 is a food source for plants. Go figure.


  • Options
    animateanimate Member Posts: 4,231
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    I nominate chinese surnames for all the tards in the tug.

    Might as well get used to it.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,917
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited January 2021
    animate said:

    I nominate chinese surnames for all the tards in the tug.

    Might as well get used to it.

    Kwai Chang @animate Cain doesn't roll off the tongue.

    Hol Lee @animate Fuk is better.
  • Options
    GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 5,384
    First Comment 5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes

    “Climate change isn’t real”

    “Well ok of course the climate is changing but it’s not man made”

    “Well ok it’s real but the effects won’t be that bad”

    The is some insight into why no one gives a fuck what you have to say. You’re welcome.

    I bet you love Kerry's plane
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 9,008
    5 Up Votes Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    “Climate change isn’t real”

    “Well ok of course the climate is changing but it’s not man made”

    “Well ok it’s real but the effects won’t be that bad”

    The is some insight into why no one gives a fuck what you have to say. You’re welcome.

    Thoughts on nuclear?
  • Options
    MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 6,142
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Still love these threads. Imagine claiming to understand this issue with no training or education in it.

    Dunning-Krueger Effect, ftw.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,564
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    MelloDawg said:

    Still love these threads. Imagine claiming to understand this issue with no training or education in it.

    Dunning-Krueger Effect, ftw.

    We're smarter than you and you don't get it

    Sure
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,970
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    Still love these threads. Imagine claiming to understand this issue with no training or education in it.

    Dunning-Krueger Effect, ftw.

    Like John Kerry? When one you green gaia religionist leftards want to tell me how much we should spend and what it will accomplish - they you can run your mouths.
Sign In or Register to comment.