Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Marques Tuiasosopo's impact?

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,112 Founders Club
    Pinkel is Sark. Your notables are in notable. Pressing
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,195 Founders Club
    If I sounded terse it was only due to poasting from my phone, which is a bit cumbersome and therefore I limit the length of my responses from it. I still stand by what I said though.
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581

    You mean like both Mora's and a Pinkel? :D

    Obviously not all assistant coaches are as good or better than their bosses

    Sark, Kiffen, and Holt are all great examples of that...

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    If I sounded terse it was only due to poasting from my phone, which is a bit cumbersome and therefore I limit the length of my responses from it. I still stand by what I said though.

    90mph, I5, blow, hookers ass?

  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,361 Founders Club
    Phone poasting is a challenge. :D

    What is your point?
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,361 Founders Club

    Pinkel is Sark. Your notables are in notable. Pressing

    Not pressing, and sorta disagree on Pinkel.

    Pinkel did significantly elevate a miserable Missouri program in a reasonable Big 12. I don't think Sark has it in him to do the same thing at UW, even in a weak PAC 12.

    In the SEC, Pinkel is Sark. He has no chance. He built a soft ball team and is now in a semi-pro football league. But, their fans don't expect to compete in the SEC, everyone has told them they can't, so if he can win 6 games a year and get to one of the 10 bowl games the SEC goes to, he's safe. In the SEC, Pinkel is Sark, or Sinkel as I like to call him.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Tui was roaming the sidelines in 2011. 7 wins. There's your answer.
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200

    Pinkel is Sark. Your notables are in notable. Pressing

    Missouri was 60-115, the 16 years before Pinkel. He's 90-61. Take off the first 2 years and he's 81-47.

    Not saying I want Pinkel, but I sure as hell would take him over Sark who hasn't done jack shit.

    Great, Good, Mediocre.....Pinkel is good, Sark is mediocre....Saban, Meyer, Chip, Peterson are all Great.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,909 Founders Club
    edited May 2013
    I wouldn't go as far to say great head coachs produce successful head coaches out of their staffs as much as they produce attractive head coaching candidates.

    Look at USC under Carroll with Sark, Holt, Kiffen and Oregeron or whatever the fuck his name is.

    How many of those guys were can't miss head coaching greats when hired?

    How many still have head coaching jobs or will have head coaching jobs after 2013?

    Don James was similar. After his assistants left his side, they didn't do much and out of the list posted above, only Saban has won championships. Mora still has time to win the PAC-12 and a Rose Bowl at UCLA but that's it out of that group.