Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Attn Trumptards: time to let it go
Comments
-
Alone.BearsWiin said:
He's about to storm the beach at Pacificadflea said:
Not nearly as brave as you running that cocksucker on your face from home, but still...SFGbob said:
Truly a profile in courage.dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Tell us a war story, gaybob the brave.
-
The greatest fear this Kunt has is engaging in a substantive discussion. He knows that if he does so he gets exposed for the lightweight dipshit he really is. Imagine the mindset it takes to hangout on a political message board with the intent to never discuss policy and to run like a scalded dog hurling insults when asked to do so.dflea said:
Not nearly as brave as you running that cocksucker on your face from home, but still...SFGbob said:
Truly a profile in courage.dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Tell us a war story, gaybob the brave.
Takes a special kind of fucking pussy to do that. -
You do have enough mind expansion capacity to understand that this ISN'T about Trump, right?dflea said:
I'm not very good at guessing what retards are up to when they do their retarded shit, so I don't think I'll take the time to venture a guess.PurpleThrobber said:
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Besides, I want lard ass to lose, so I'm going to go ahead and look the other way. I'm sure if anything solid comes up, I'll hear about it.
If "they" can fuck with this election - 'they' can fuck with EVERY election.
So, I take it to mean you give no fucks whether someone other than the vote of the people determines who the elected officials may be. Is that correct?
-
Bingo.PurpleThrobber said:
You do have enough mind expansion capacity to understand that this ISN'T about Trump, right?dflea said:
I'm not very good at guessing what retards are up to when they do their retarded shit, so I don't think I'll take the time to venture a guess.PurpleThrobber said:
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Besides, I want lard ass to lose, so I'm going to go ahead and look the other way. I'm sure if anything solid comes up, I'll hear about it.
If "they" can fuck with this election - 'they' can fuck with EVERY election.
So, I take it to mean you give no fucks whether someone other than the vote of the people determines who the elected officials may be. Is that correct?
See California, Washington and Oregon as examples.
It’s not oveR for Loren Culp -
It might be - pretty far fetched....but a possibility, I suppose.doogie said:
Bingo.PurpleThrobber said:
You do have enough mind expansion capacity to understand that this ISN'T about Trump, right?dflea said:
I'm not very good at guessing what retards are up to when they do their retarded shit, so I don't think I'll take the time to venture a guess.PurpleThrobber said:
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Besides, I want lard ass to lose, so I'm going to go ahead and look the other way. I'm sure if anything solid comes up, I'll hear about it.
If "they" can fuck with this election - 'they' can fuck with EVERY election.
So, I take it to mean you give no fucks whether someone other than the vote of the people determines who the elected officials may be. Is that correct?
See California, Washington and Oregon as examples.
It’s not oveR for Loren Culp
So mark you down for election systems that have apparent holes where someone other than voters can swoop in and modify the results?
What if was the GOP side doing that? Take Trump's name off of it - this could be some shitty shit.
-
And don't threadjack - focus back on allowing @dflea exercising mind expansion beyond the TDS.
-
Agree with you completely. Since our elected Leaders have no stomach to fight it, At All, Can you explain to me what advantage there is to join the Cliven Bundy Last Line of defense with a handful of others in the middle of the desert?PurpleThrobber said:
It might be - pretty far fetched....but a possibility, I suppose.doogie said:
Bingo.PurpleThrobber said:
You do have enough mind expansion capacity to understand that this ISN'T about Trump, right?dflea said:
I'm not very good at guessing what retards are up to when they do their retarded shit, so I don't think I'll take the time to venture a guess.PurpleThrobber said:
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Besides, I want lard ass to lose, so I'm going to go ahead and look the other way. I'm sure if anything solid comes up, I'll hear about it.
If "they" can fuck with this election - 'they' can fuck with EVERY election.
So, I take it to mean you give no fucks whether someone other than the vote of the people determines who the elected officials may be. Is that correct?
See California, Washington and Oregon as examples.
It’s not oveR for Loren Culp
So mark you down for election systems that have apparent holes where someone other than voters can swoop in and modify the results?
What if was the GOP side doing that? Take Trump's name off of it - this could be some shitty shit. -
Why not? Are you assuming this is the last free election to be held in the US? If something is broken, does it not make sense to fix it? And understand how it was broken or compromised?doogie said:
Agree with you completely. Since our elected Leaders have no stomach to fight it, At All, Can you explain to me what advantage there is to join the Cliven Bundy Last Line of defense with a handful of others in the middle of the desert?PurpleThrobber said:
It might be - pretty far fetched....but a possibility, I suppose.doogie said:
Bingo.PurpleThrobber said:
You do have enough mind expansion capacity to understand that this ISN'T about Trump, right?dflea said:
I'm not very good at guessing what retards are up to when they do their retarded shit, so I don't think I'll take the time to venture a guess.PurpleThrobber said:
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
Besides, I want lard ass to lose, so I'm going to go ahead and look the other way. I'm sure if anything solid comes up, I'll hear about it.
If "they" can fuck with this election - 'they' can fuck with EVERY election.
So, I take it to mean you give no fucks whether someone other than the vote of the people determines who the elected officials may be. Is that correct?
See California, Washington and Oregon as examples.
It’s not oveR for Loren Culp
So mark you down for election systems that have apparent holes where someone other than voters can swoop in and modify the results?
What if was the GOP side doing that? Take Trump's name off of it - this could be some shitty shit.
That's not conspiracy - that's good security controls and software design. You like bad buggy software, too?
-
looks to me it’s already been Fixed.
I think it’s a shame Elected GOP Leaders are standing down leaving Trump to dangle in the wind alone.
I have no idea what to expect in elections four years from now. I know this one sure stinks but that the GOP “leadership” void stinks worse. -
The Tug isn’t a “Husky” bored until one of you Doogs gets slapped around by a Duck and suddenly the Oregon insults start because that’s the only game you have, John the Fisherman.dflea said:
Fuck off, Duck faggot. Catch a steelhead, you little bitch boy, and leave the little trout for the kids and girls.NorthwestFresh said:
What is your purpose here other than to whine because you’re a good sheep and don’t fish when your governor says you can’t fish?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
You don't have to fag out every fucking thread, you dumb cunt. But you will anyway, won't you? 5 thousand poasts on a Husky bulletin bored and you ask me why I'm here? You stupid fuck.
