Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
NYT “Anonymous” NeverTrumper Revealed
Comments
-
You seem oddly knowledgeableHustlinOwl said:
So when you give President Trump a blow job do you just let it hit the back of your throat and just gag a little or do you adjust your body so it slides down as far as needed?NorthwestFresh said:
Not even a peon. When he wrote the op-Ed and book, he wasn’t even the DHS Chief of Staff. The article came out in 2018. Wasn’t Chief Schedule Maker until February 2019zGoduckies said:
Bs it was implied it was someone like Kelly etc... nope just some peonHHusky said:
Bullshit. The Times explicitly said possible candidates number in the hundreds. "Senior" doesn't refer to age in this context and it didn't mean "someone in the Cabinet".NorthwestFresh said:
Cabinet officials are “senior.” This guy lied about having interactions with the President and was pushed out of his job after 8 months. A nobody, just like you.HHusky said:Chief of Staff to a member of the Cabinet is no longer “senior”?
He graduated from HS in 2006. The NYT will push any Fake News from a Coffee Boy.
He filed paperwork in a cubicle when that op-ed was published. -
-
#Resist is going to have an economic collapse in a few days.
-
And now he is on CNN trashing Trump about the 524 kids thing. Now we know why that came out, that was their October surprise
-
Policy advisor just slightly above intern in the DC pecking order.
They get coffee for the big people table instead of giving blow jobs for no pay.
-
Proving that you're a disingenuous hack who is either ignoring the facts surrounding this story or intentionally lying about the facts surrounding this story.HHusky said:
Who strongly hinted at those things?SFGbob said:
They strongly hinted that it was a Chief of Staff a Cabinet member or possibly even Mike Pence. You really don't need to strap on the kneepads every time your team embarrasses itself Dazzler.HHusky said:
Bullshit. The Times explicitly said possible candidates number in the hundreds. "Senior" doesn't refer to age in this context and it didn't mean "someone in the Cabinet".NorthwestFresh said:
Cabinet officials are “senior.” This guy lied about having interactions with the President and was pushed out of his job after 8 months. A nobody, just like you.HHusky said:Chief of Staff to a member of the Cabinet is no longer “senior”?
He graduated from HS in 2006. The NYT will push any Fake News from a Coffee Boy.
We were told by our media betters that it had to be a high level person in the Trump Admin. A name that we'd all recognize, a Cabinet Sect. or Chief of Staff maybe even Mike Pence because there was no way that the NYTimes would turn over their editorial page to low level staffer writing an anonymous OpEd. Their "high" journalistic standards and ethics wouldn't allow.
-
long way around saying it didn't happenSFGbob said:
Proving that you're a disingenuous hack who is either ignoring the facts surrounding this story or intentionally lying about the facts surrounding this story.HHusky said:
Who strongly hinted at those things?SFGbob said:
They strongly hinted that it was a Chief of Staff a Cabinet member or possibly even Mike Pence. You really don't need to strap on the kneepads every time your team embarrasses itself Dazzler.HHusky said:
Bullshit. The Times explicitly said possible candidates number in the hundreds. "Senior" doesn't refer to age in this context and it didn't mean "someone in the Cabinet".NorthwestFresh said:
Cabinet officials are “senior.” This guy lied about having interactions with the President and was pushed out of his job after 8 months. A nobody, just like you.HHusky said:Chief of Staff to a member of the Cabinet is no longer “senior”?
He graduated from HS in 2006. The NYT will push any Fake News from a Coffee Boy.
We were told by our media betters that it had to be a high level person in the Trump Admin. A name that we'd all recognize, a Cabinet Sect. or Chief of Staff maybe even Mike Pence because there was no way that the NYTimes would turn over their editorial page to low level staffer writing an anonymous OpEd. Their "high" journalistic standards and ethics wouldn't allow.
i appreciate the concession -
The left have no ethics. Commies never do.
-
