Remember when we were told that this behavior was the ultimate in disrespect?

SFGbob

Now compare this to the actions of the "protesters" who were harassing people leaving the White House last night. You have members of the media attacking Rand Paul calling him a "snowflake" for complaining about the treatment he received.

RaceBannon

http://twitter.com/omriceren/status/1299342472678703110?s=20

SFGbob

I'm old enough to remember when "taunting" and "harassing" people in public in Washington DC was a bad thing.

RaceBannon

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

MikeDamone

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

GreenRiverGatorz

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

MikeDamone

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

FireCohen

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

https://twitter.com/UpperQueenAnne/status/1299424716424241152

GreenRiverGatorz

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

MikeDamone

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Your logical fallacy is the False equivalence fallacy. Which is why my my post poignant and what made your post the very thing I mocked.

GreenRiverGatorz

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Your logical fallacy is the False equivalence fallacy. Which is why my my post poignant and what made your post the very thing I mocked.

Quite the opposite. I hate all anecdotal equivalency arguments. In this example, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who defend Paul but then hold Blake culpable for his actions are dumb. Likewise, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who hold Paul responsible but also oppose the "she-had-it-coming" argument are also dumb. Culpability is not binary. Every one of these examples involves some level of personal responsibility, and none of them are the same. Trying to draw false equivalencies between any of them can be done by both sides and is just dumbshit blabbering by all involved.

SFGbob

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Now that's some serious Kunt logic. This rivals some of Owl's more head up the ass takes. Blake had warrants out for his arrest and was resisting arrest and refusing to comply with lawful police commands. He may or may not of had a knife in his hand as he resisted arrest. Rand Paul hadn't done anything to anyone. He was walking in public. Other than that you fucking nailed it.

NorthwestFresh

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Hold on now. Jacob Blake going to a woman’s house who allegedly has a restraining order out on him is similar to Rand Paul walking home from the White House to his DC condo?

I guess what you’re saying is that Republicans should be fearful of Democrats protesting in the streets? Is that your case?

Houhusky

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

This is, quiet literally, one of the single dumbest points I have ever seen on the Tug and this place has @HHusky , @oregonblitzkrieg , and @insinceredawg regularly posting here.

Its so dumb I initially scrolled right past because I thought you were doing a sarcastic intentionally dumbfuck bit because no one could possibly be that stupid.

you are better than this

#BeBest

RaceBannon

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Your logical fallacy is the False equivalence fallacy. Which is why my my post poignant and what made your post the very thing I mocked.

Quite the opposite. I hate all anecdotal equivalency arguments. In this example, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who defend Paul but then hold Blake culpable for his actions are dumb. Likewise, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who hold Paul responsible but also oppose the "she-had-it-coming" argument are also dumb. Culpability is not binary. Every one of these examples involves some level of personal responsibility, and none of them are the same. Trying to draw false equivalencies between any of them can be done by both sides and is just dumbshit blabbering by all involved.

MikeDamone

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

Why did Jacob Blake resist arrest? Except that's actually being said by almost everyone here. And frankly it's not an unfair point.

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the tweet about Rand Paul.

Right, and I'm pointing out the hypocrisy from the other side. Plenty of people who made the above comment about "Blake had it coming" are aghast at people saying Rand is to blame for walking through the crowd.

Your logical fallacy is the False equivalence fallacy. Which is why my my post poignant and what made your post the very thing I mocked.

Quite the opposite. I hate all anecdotal equivalency arguments. In this example, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who defend Paul but then hold Blake culpable for his actions are dumb. Likewise, people decrying the hypocrisy of those who hold Paul responsible but also oppose the "she-had-it-coming" argument are also dumb. Culpability is not binary. Every one of these examples involves some level of personal responsibility, and none of them are the same. Trying to draw false equivalencies between any of them can be done by both sides and is just dumbshit blabbering by all involved.

Are you knew? I served a softball and you whiffed, then continued swinging.

Goduckies

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/omriceren/status/1299342472678703110?s=20

That black dude in the picture tried to hit rand. He luckily got stopped

Pitchfork51

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

He was begging for it the way he was dressed

http://twitter.com/Jacq4Peace/status/1299323870306922496?s=20

Why would George Flloyd put himself in a position to be killed by the cops. His judgment was bad. He didn't need to do that.

To be fair he was in the middle of overdosing. So he didn't actually put himself in any position.