Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Reporter Millie Weaver Jailed

pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,975 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
This is controversial af. A story you should be watching carefully that won't see the light of day on msm. I know I know infowars, but why was this reporter arrested for exercising her 1A rights? YouTube killed the video linked in the story and you are going to have to find it on the dark web. Prob wouldn't watch w/o a VPN, tbh. To get that kind of rebuke, I can only think she hit the nail on the head and the govt doesn't want YOU to know.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/infowars-reporter-millie-weaver-arrested-weekend-shortly-releasing-shadowgate-new-documentary-social-media-psychological-warfare-used-american-public/






Didn't mean to scoop OBK on this one, but still.....
Tagged:
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    Look forward to hearing more about this. Hope it's proven to be factual and it wakes a few more people up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,570 Founders Club
    Here is the link to the banned video. I haven't watched it so I have no thoughts one way or another right now about it.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Is she the Rachel Maddow of the right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    doogie said:

    Is she the Rachel Maddow of the right?







    Except she's not ugly as a mud fence.

    Not smoking hot either but dem tittays....


    Wood need to see more but with these pics I'd say a solid 7.5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,499 Founders Club
    doogie said:

    it was spirit horse embroidered on her tit that did it for you, wasn’t it.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,710 Swaye's Wigwam
    Swaye said:

    WOOD


    Eyes shaped unevenly. Pass.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,499 Founders Club
    GrandpaSankey said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Swaye said:

    WOOD


    Eyes shaped unevenly. Pass.
    Fag
    Even a blind guy could tell she's hot. Amirite?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    Here is the link to the banned video. I haven't watched it so I have no thoughts one way or another right now about it.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03

    So just finished watching it and the basic premise is intuitive. About 3/4 through I kept thinking about a great movie I saw in the 80's I think; Wag the Dog. Then with about 15 minutes left the woman being interviewed mentions something to the effect of this is all like the movie Wag the Dog. Yeah, all of this is intuitive and if you don't know this is being done, then you're a dipshit worthy of the moniker lemming or useful idiot. So now I'd like to know why she was arrested. If this is real, wouldn't the people being interviewed be afraid for their lives? For the conspiracy theory OBK crowd, who Seth Rich was including his involvement with the DNC server hack and subsequent email release scandal is addressed pretty late in the video probably between the 1 hour and 1:15 mark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,931 Standard Supporter
    She was jailed for a domestic violence report made by another family member. The family member retracted the report statement shortly after making it but the police are often required to continue investigating as there does not need to be a reporting party and the offenders are required to arrested by law immediately of the possible offender.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    She was jailed for a domestic violence report made by another family member. The family member retracted the report statement shortly after making it but the police are often required to continue investigating as there does not need to be a reporting party and the offenders are required to arrested by law immediately of the possible offender.

    Yeah I just read that. It seems really odd that a grand jury and intense investigation would be formed and resources wasted on a stupid Maury Povich like family dispute where mom gets tossed to the floor and her cell phone gets thrown into the woods. Who fing cares?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,931 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    Sledog said:

    She was jailed for a domestic violence report made by another family member. The family member retracted the report statement shortly after making it but the police are often required to continue investigating as there does not need to be a reporting party and the offenders are required to arrested by law immediately of the possible offender.

    Yeah I just read that. It seems really odd that a grand jury and intense investigation would be formed and resources wasted on a stupid Maury Povich like family dispute where mom gets tossed to the floor and her cell phone gets thrown into the woods. Who fing cares?
    A lefty DA cares GREATLY.

    Just like they care about not charging ANTIFA and BLM.

    It's all context and commie politics. Injecting common sense (now a super power) isn't allowed!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    Sledog said:

    She was jailed for a domestic violence report made by another family member. The family member retracted the report statement shortly after making it but the police are often required to continue investigating as there does not need to be a reporting party and the offenders are required to arrested by law immediately of the possible offender.

    It was an incident over a $50 phone while having an argument with her mother. The mother explicitly requested no charges.

    The family incident occurred in April 20th, the secret indictment/warrant was issued in July 20th, the arrest was made in August 14th (the day of her documentary release).

    Whether its about personal petty corrupt local sheriff shit or actually about the documentary... Sure smells a lot like intimidation and legal dick waiving.

    here is the interaction between her and the sheriff that pushed for the secret indictment on the April incident



    child protective services is now investigating her and her husband and they could lose custody of their children.

    Viva Frei gives the best quick legal perspective on this stuff:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2YCu99wFOI
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,570 Founders Club
    my god
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,931 Standard Supporter
    Politically motivated bullshit.

    Without a victim it's really hard to prosecute a crime that the victim will not testify to.

    We'll wait for legal scholar HH to offer his highly sought opinion.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,238 Standard Supporter
    If she’s an abusive parent, CSP should handle it. But the timing is circumspect.


    Yet Bill Clinton is still at large after multiple trips to Epstein’s Island.


    And you wonder why OBK posts what he does?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.