Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Either the NYTimes made it up entirely out of whole cloth or they were being fed misinformation.
Shouldn't the Times be leading the charge to reveal to us who it was that was feeding them this misinformation? No need to protect a source that was lying to you. The Times won a fucking Pulitzer for this "reporting." Why isn't there a huge push by them to get to the bottom of this?
7 ·
Comments
Declassified by the Justice Department, the document contains the Times story that reported there were extensive contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence. The document also contains a typewritten critique in the margins by FBI Agent Peter Strzok, who totally rejected the Times’ claim.
“Again, we are unaware of ANY Trump advisors engaging in conversations with Russian intelligence officials,” Mr. Strzok wrote.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/18/new-document-shows-fbi-totally-debunked-new-york-t/
Outsiders don’t work out well for DC.
Had something to do with the Trilateral Commission. Conspiracy Theory central.