Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Next Step

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,648 Standard Supporter
in Tug Tavern
Auburn fans will continue to War Eagle and Ducks and Beavers will continue to call it the Civil War. Unfortunately, we are one election away from the use of these now supposedly banned terms to be classified as hate speech and subject to civil and criminal penalties. Not one major dem candidate unequivocally supports the First Amendment.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited June 2020
    Moda Center fans disagree but Climate Pledge Greta Arena fans are confused.

    Still seeing nothing solid that War Eagle is donzo other than an @RaceBannon haha.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,433 Founders Club
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Auburn fans will continue to War Eagle and Ducks and Beavers will continue to call it the Civil War. Unfortunately, we are one election away from the use of these now supposedly banned terms to be classified as hate speech and subject to civil and criminal penalties. Not one major dem candidate unequivocally supports the First Amendment.

    Agree on Auburn, but Oregon and OSU fans will stop calling it Civil War. Cook it!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,470 Founders Club
    NorthwestFresh said:

    Moda Center fans disagree but Climate Pledge Greta Arena fans are confused.

    Still seeing nothing solid that War Eagle is donzo other than an @RaceBannon haha.

    News before it happens. Takes time to get to everything
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    People forget U.S. v. Schenck was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. They forget that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,648 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    You suck at this. Yelling fire in a crowded theater isn't the same as opposing gay marriage on a website or wanting illegal aliens deported, now is it. So rather than defend the right to free speech you drag the thread off the rails like a good leftard. Never deal with the actual facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,915
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    Picked the idiot hill to die on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    People forget U.S. v. Schenck was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. They forget that.
    Partially. The scope was limited but not eliminated. Inciting a riot, for example, is still very much banned. You can also try to leave death threats on the facebook page of any congressman and let us know what happens.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    People forget U.S. v. Schenck was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. They forget that.
    Partially. The scope was limited but not eliminated. Inciting a riot, for example, is still very much banned. You can also try to leave death threats on the facebook page of any congressman and let us know what happens.
    Right...but yelling fire in a theatre is a myth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,111 Swaye's Wigwam
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    People forget U.S. v. Schenck was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. They forget that.
    Partially. The scope was limited but not eliminated. Inciting a riot, for example, is still very much banned. You can also try to leave death threats on the facebook page of any congressman and let us know what happens.
    I'm hearing rioting is a valid form of protest and won't be prosecuted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Who does unequivocally support the First Amendment? I thought we had decades-long consensus that there are practical exceptions to that. The old "fire in the movie theater" being a civics 101 favorite.

    People forget U.S. v. Schenck was overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio. They forget that.
    Partially. The scope was limited but not eliminated. Inciting a riot, for example, is still very much banned. You can also try to leave death threats on the facebook page of any congressman and let us know what happens.
    I'm hearing rioting is a valid form of protest and won't be prosecuted.
    I think it's too early to say how @WarlordRaz plans on dealing with rioters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.