Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump asked Chinese president for reelection help in 2020, Bolton writes in explosive new book

insinceredawg
insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
in Tug Tavern
If only there was a way to question him under oath on this
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,763 Standard Supporter
    Almost as funny as you not living in mom's basement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,884 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,884 Founders Club
    Faux news

    Bolton, in book, accuses Trump of 'obstruction of justice as a way of life,' asking China's Xi for 2020 help

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bolton-in-book-accuses-trump-of-obstruction-of-justice-as-a-way-of-life-asking-chinas-xi-for-2020-help
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    Dipshit @insinceredawg apparently doesn’t understand that the House Rats could have at any point over the last 10 months demand Chickenhawk Bolton testify under oath.

    Imagine being that stupid. Imagine it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited June 2020
    So Trump May have told Xing that China buying more commodities is going to help him get re elected.

    Even if true, that’s a nothin burger.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    Tariffs on China
    Calling WuFlu “China Flu”

    Meanwhile Biden says China isn’t the enemy just last year.

    How much shit has Xi packed into the buttholes of @insinceredawg and Chickenhawk Bolton to make them look so foolish?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    Dipshit @insinceredawg apparently doesn’t understand that the House Rats could have at any point over the last 10 months demand Chickenhawk Bolton testify under oath.

    Imagine being that stupid. Imagine it.
    Imagine sharing a tweet from a Russian bot and thinking they just broke a big story
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Also, what did Bolton have to do with Ukraine and that Biden cover-up?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    so, no?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    So the Rats in the House didn't subpoena him because they didn't care to learn the truth. I love how this dumbfuck doesn't hold his own party to any standards. By January the House had already voted to impeach Trump, they obviously felt they didn't need his testimony to go forth with the trial in the Senate. Only after you idiots realized that Schiff lied to you yet again and that the House's case was weak shit, did you start demanding that the Senate GOP help you out.

    Take Schiff's dick out of your mouth for once IC. He played your stupid ass yet again.
    Did the GOP go into the the senate trial with the intention to learn the truth or run cover for Trump? Is it party over country or country over party? Pretty clear where your team's priorities lay. Bitchass partisan kunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    Dipshit @insinceredawg apparently doesn’t understand that the House Rats could have at any point over the last 10 months demand Chickenhawk Bolton testify under oath.

    Imagine being that stupid. Imagine it.
    Imagine sharing a tweet from a Russian bot and thinking they just broke a big story
    Imagine swallowing like a bitch for 3 years the absolute bullshit that Trump colluded with the Russians in order to win the election. And then imagine being such a shameless partisan hack that when it's revealed that Hillary and the DNC really did collude with the Russians and paid for Russian disinformation in an attempt to influence the election, you don't really give a fuck because you love being lied to by idiots like Adam Schiff.
    Did you switch your favorite news source to OAN?




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited June 2020
    Hey IC, remember when you stuck your head up your ass and claimed that nothing in the Steele Dossier was shown to be wrong and that it was never used to secure a FISA warrant, and that any claims to contrary were a right-wing tinfoil hat conspiracy theory?

    And then do you recall when you swallowed like a bitch every single lie in the Schiff memo while claiming the Nunes memo was filled with lies?

    How did that work out for ya dumbfuck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    Dipshit @insinceredawg apparently doesn’t understand that the House Rats could have at any point over the last 10 months demand Chickenhawk Bolton testify under oath.

    Imagine being that stupid. Imagine it.
    Imagine sharing a tweet from a Russian bot and thinking they just broke a big story
    Imagine thinking Neo-Con Bolton not testifying under oath for the Dems and instead writing a book because he didn’t get to kill more Brown People in the Middle East is newsworthy. Fired guy is angry. Huge story, dumbass.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    So the Rats in the House didn't subpoena him because they didn't care to learn the truth. I love how this dumbfuck doesn't hold his own party to any standards. By January the House had already voted to impeach Trump, they obviously felt they didn't need his testimony to go forth with the trial in the Senate. Only after you idiots realized that Schiff lied to you yet again and that the House's case was weak shit, did you start demanding that the Senate GOP help you out.

    Take Schiff's dick out of your mouth for once IC. He played your stupid ass yet again.
    Did the GOP go into the the senate trial with the intention to learn the truth or run cover for Trump? Is it party over country or country over party? Pretty clear where your team's priorities lay. Bitchass partisan kunt.
    This is an absolutely amazing meltdown. Please continue.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    so, no?

    He wanted to save the information for a book nobody will read instead of impeaching the traitorous President when given the chance under oath in the House.

    Is @insinceredawg a 15 year-old?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    So the Rats in the House didn't subpoena him because they didn't care to learn the truth. I love how this dumbfuck doesn't hold his own party to any standards. By January the House had already voted to impeach Trump, they obviously felt they didn't need his testimony to go forth with the trial in the Senate. Only after you idiots realized that Schiff lied to you yet again and that the House's case was weak shit, did you start demanding that the Senate GOP help you out.

    Take Schiff's dick out of your mouth for once IC. He played your stupid ass yet again.
    Did the GOP go into the the senate trial with the intention to learn the truth or run cover for Trump? Is it party over country or country over party? Pretty clear where your team's priorities lay. Bitchass partisan kunt.
    This is an absolutely amazing meltdown. Please continue.
    Ah, the good ol "i have no idea how to respond to that so I'll just wave the white flag and call it a meltdown" move. Classic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    So the Rats in the House didn't subpoena him because they didn't care to learn the truth. I love how this dumbfuck doesn't hold his own party to any standards. By January the House had already voted to impeach Trump, they obviously felt they didn't need his testimony to go forth with the trial in the Senate. Only after you idiots realized that Schiff lied to you yet again and that the House's case was weak shit, did you start demanding that the Senate GOP help you out.

    Take Schiff's dick out of your mouth for once IC. He played your stupid ass yet again.
    Did the GOP go into the the senate trial with the intention to learn the truth or run cover for Trump? Is it party over country or country over party? Pretty clear where your team's priorities lay. Bitchass partisan kunt.
    This is an absolutely amazing meltdown. Please continue.
    Ah, the good ol "i have no idea how to respond to that so I'll just wave the white flag and call it a meltdown" move. Classic.
    I responded multiple tims. Please continue your Wednesday afternoon meltdown. It’s making this conference call tolerable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    Why didn't the House Rats subpoena him? It's not the job of the Senate Republicans to make the House's case.
    Dipshit @insinceredawg apparently doesn’t understand that the House Rats could have at any point over the last 10 months demand Chickenhawk Bolton testify under oath.

    Imagine being that stupid. Imagine it.
    Imagine sharing a tweet from a Russian bot and thinking they just broke a big story
    Imagine thinking Neo-Con Bolton not testifying under oath for the Dems and instead writing a book because he didn’t get to kill more Brown People in the Middle East is newsworthy. Fired guy is angry. Huge story, dumbass.
    Serious question. Has anyone that left Trump's cabinet have anything positive to say about him? It's such a lazy cop out to just attribute it as them being bitter for getting fired. Bolton, Mattis, Kelly, Scaramucci, Tillerson, etc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,570 Standard Supporter
    The knew the truth. No high crimes or misdemeanors was listed in the House articles. That's the truth. Mueller and Rosenstein were aware when the special investigation started that there was no evidence of Russian - Trump collusion. There was no "crime" to investigate. Your the party over country.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    NorthwestFresh said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:


    Houhusky said:

    insinceredawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Seems as if the Rats in the House could put Chickenhawk Bolton under oath to testify but wow that’s just not going to happen.

    Republicans voted against having him testify at the impeachment trial. Why do you think they did that?
    He refused to testify

    He's now blaming the democratic impeachment managers for that

    Hope this helps
    He refused cause he wanted save the info for this book. He's a selfish piece of shit. But Republicans could have subpoenaed him to testify and declined. Did you already forget?
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/31/us/politics/impeachment-vote.html
    serious question, was there something that stopped Bolton from being subpoenaed to testify during the evidence collection phase controlled by the democrats in the House during the impeachment process?

    He refused to show up for a deposition but the Dems should have been more aggressive. In January he said he was willing to testify if subpoenaed but the Republicans voted against it. Obviously they didn't care to learn the truth and only cared about covering up for Orange Man.
    So the Rats in the House didn't subpoena him because they didn't care to learn the truth. I love how this dumbfuck doesn't hold his own party to any standards. By January the House had already voted to impeach Trump, they obviously felt they didn't need his testimony to go forth with the trial in the Senate. Only after you idiots realized that Schiff lied to you yet again and that the House's case was weak shit, did you start demanding that the Senate GOP help you out.

    Take Schiff's dick out of your mouth for once IC. He played your stupid ass yet again.
    Did the GOP go into the the senate trial with the intention to learn the truth or run cover for Trump? Is it party over country or country over party? Pretty clear where your team's priorities lay. Bitchass partisan kunt.
    This is an absolutely amazing meltdown. Please continue.
    Ah, the good ol "i have no idea how to respond to that so I'll just wave the white flag and call it a meltdown" move. Classic.
    I responded multiple tims. Please continue your Wednesday afternoon meltdown. It’s making this conference call tolerable.
    That's cute that you Boogaloo Bois have conference calls. How's the wifi signal from mom's basement?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter