Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fauci: no school in fall
Comments
-
It’s interesting the immediate reaction is that I’m advocating for there to be no school in the fall. I am not. Those who are in support, however, will say all 3 things I said above. It has little to do with immediate risk to children.doogie said:
Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Because they can be carriers, because they can be asymptomatic, because anyone can be asymptomatic.Sledog said:The Rona doesn't bother kids. We know this. So why?
My kids and Grandkids remain on Permanent lockdown because they might get my friends sick while they themselves are at No personal risk? -
Who knew you could actually eat the coronavirus?rodmansrage said:
sir (yes i assumed your gender!) look at this buoyancy beauty below, she was just 29 and perished! if it can get her, it can get anyone!Swaye said:Can we just get to killing Granny so this shit can be over. If you aren't 80, there is little to no risk. If you are 80, you are just a total suck on the economy and the SS savings will be good for everyone. Win fucking win.

-
The only thing in the middle of the road is road kill. Take a stand sonMelloDawg said:
It’s interesting the immediate reaction is that I’m advocating for there to be no school in the fall. I am not. Those who are in support, however, will say all 3 things I said above. It has little to do with immediate risk to children.doogie said:
Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Because they can be carriers, because they can be asymptomatic, because anyone can be asymptomatic.Sledog said:The Rona doesn't bother kids. We know this. So why?
My kids and Grandkids remain on Permanent lockdown because they might get my friends sick while they themselves are at No personal risk?
-
the ‘secret’ dats
Schools should be Open right NOW!!!MelloDawg said:
It’s interesting the immediate reaction is that I’m advocating for there to be no school in the fall. I am not. Those who are in support, however, will say all 3 things I said above. It has little to do with immediate risk to children.doogie said:
Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Because they can be carriers, because they can be asymptomatic, because anyone can be asymptomatic.Sledog said:The Rona doesn't bother kids. We know this. So why?
My kids and Grandkids remain on Permanent lockdown because they might get my friends sick while they themselves are at No personal risk?
-
Fauci specifically asked about the mortality rate.
He said it’s higher than the basic deaths / infections say.
Obviously that’s bullshit. I’ve tuned out.
Now more than ever we need a neutral party to outline everything mathematically and ethically to the masses. -
I said this back in March.GrundleStiltzkin said:MelloDawg said:
Because they can be carriers, because they can be asymptomatic, because anyone can be asymptomatic.Sledog said:The Rona doesn't bother kids. We know this. So why?
A more rational concern—also cited by these governors—addresses the possibility that asymptomatic schoolchildren could end up passing the virus to their teachers, parents, or other adults. But even here the balance of existing evidence suggests this worry is largely unfounded. “Children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults, and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill,” said Kári Stefánsson, in an interview following the publication of an Icelandic study he coauthored in The New England Journal of Medicine. “What is interesting,” he continued, “is that even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”
The same conclusion has been reached by many others. A report released by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment for the Netherlands found “no indications that children younger than 12 years were the first to be infected within the family.” Rather, it remarked, “The virus is mainly spread between adults and from adult family members to children.” A report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease stated: “Of note, people interviewed by the Joint Mission Team could not recall episodes in which transmission occurred from a child to an adult.”
https://www.wired.com/story/the-case-for-reopening-schools/
-
So did 'they'.LebamDawg said:The numbers don't lie when it comes to continuing this lock down
6,000,000 Americans infected = 1.7%
Deaths
80,000 = 1.3% of the infected and 0.023 % of the population.
WE CAN"T RISK OPENING UP
Edit - I made the numbers up
-
Had (800) GOT-JUNK swing by on Sunday and pick up a bunch of stuff. Neither of the workers wore masks and they weren’t worried about catching the ‘vid. They’ve been working the entire time and have 4-5 stops a day. Neither one has been sick or met anyone who has been.
By the way, it cost me over $500.00 to get rid of donatable stuff because Inslee has shut down the charity’s but not the junk yards. How does that jive with his green message? Inslee, you useless fucking twat. -
-
Elections have consequencesdnc said:








