what do we want? HERD IMMUNITY

doogie

when do we want it? NOW

once #ThePeople realize they control their own outcome and Freedom with #Intentionalinfection this shit will end.

#antibodyistheanswer

thechatch

It’s likely been in many communities(Seattle area included) long enough that we’re well along that path anyway.

Open it back up, Inslee, you fucking empty suit pussy.

RaceBannon

The lesson of the Matrix is that we? are the virus

We scoff at bat viruses and make them our own and beat them. The herd gets a bit thinner but natural selection is science is it not?

Doogles

HHusky

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mynorthwest.com/1826408/carl-bergstrom-herd-immunity-coronavirus/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/why-herd-immunity-will-not-save-us-from-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp

RoadTrip

HHusky said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mynorthwest.com/1826408/carl-bergstrom-herd-immunity-coronavirus/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/why-herd-immunity-will-not-save-us-from-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp

If only a fraction of the what ifs in both of your articles are/were actually occuring. They aren't and perhaps I should have stopped reading the first article when the first sentence begins with "UW expert."

From your second article. Again, this isn't happening.

"It's also worth thinking about the repercussions of this disastrous scenario – the best estimates put COVID-19 infection fatality rate at around 0.5-1 percent. If 70 percent of an entire population gets sick, that means that between 0.35-0.7 percent of everyone in a country could die, which is a catastrophic outcome.

With something like 10 percent of all infections needing to be hospitalised, you'd also see an enormous number of people very sick, which has huge implications for the country as well."

MikeDamone

DuckHHunterisafag said:

HHusky said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mynorthwest.com/1826408/carl-bergstrom-herd-immunity-coronavirus/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/why-herd-immunity-will-not-save-us-from-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp

If only a fraction of the what ifs in both of your articles are/were actually occuring. They aren't and perhaps I should have stopped reading the first article when the first sentence begins with "UW expert."

From your second article. Again, this isn't happening.

"It's also worth thinking about the repercussions of this disastrous scenario – the best estimates put COVID-19 infection fatality rate at around 0.5-1 percent. If 70 percent of an entire population gets sick, that means that between 0.35-0.7 percent of everyone in a country could die, which is a catastrophic outcome.

With something like 10 percent of all infections needing to be hospitalised, you'd also see an enormous number of people very sick, which has huge implications for the country as well."

Experts say..

doogie

Lol, first paragraph:

It's hard to predict things in a pandemic. The situation changes so much on a daily basis that everything I thought I knew last week is wrong by the end of the day. Things are changing so fast that even the solid certainties that I thought we were sure of – the reproductive rate, the symptoms of the infection, the key to making a good quarantine – are suspect and need to be re-evaluated.

Bob_C

MikeDamone said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

HHusky said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mynorthwest.com/1826408/carl-bergstrom-herd-immunity-coronavirus/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/why-herd-immunity-will-not-save-us-from-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp

If only a fraction of the what ifs in both of your articles are/were actually occuring. They aren't and perhaps I should have stopped reading the first article when the first sentence begins with "UW expert."

From your second article. Again, this isn't happening.

"It's also worth thinking about the repercussions of this disastrous scenario – the best estimates put COVID-19 infection fatality rate at around 0.5-1 percent. If 70 percent of an entire population gets sick, that means that between 0.35-0.7 percent of everyone in a country could die, which is a catastrophic outcome.

With something like 10 percent of all infections needing to be hospitalised, you'd also see an enormous number of people very sick, which has huge implications for the country as well."

Experts say..

Just run rating the math is such a lazy approach.

Kaepsknee

EXPERTS. snicker.

The smartest people in the world said 2.2 million dead in the US. And then some other smart people backtracked and said No, only 240,000 dead. And then those same smart people said, just joking, only 61,000 will die in the US.

The experts have flipped 180 on wearing masks, whether social distancing works or not. How it is transmitted, etc, etc.

There are no experts here. Only highly paid shills of Big Pharma that are simply winging it and acting in the interests of those that finance their 3rd home.

Shortly after the second plane hit the North Tower, one of the news anchors said, "We would like to get a Terrorism expert to comment. But today it's clear there are no experts in regards to predicting Terrorism"

HHusky

salemcoog said:

EXPERTS. snicker.

The smartest people in the world said 2.2 million dead in the US. And then some other smart people backtracked and said No, only 240,000 dead. And then those same smart people said, just joking, only 61,000 will die in the US.

The experts have flipped 180 on wearing masks, whether social distancing works or not. How it is transmitted, etc, etc.

There are no experts here. Only highly paid shills of Big Pharma that are simply winging it and acting in the interests of those that finance their 3rd home.

Shortly after the second plane hit the North Tower, one of the news anchors said, "We would like to get a Terrorism expert to comment. But today it's clear there are no experts in regards to predicting Terrorism"

2.2 million was Daddy's figure if we just did nothing.

Recall we did in fact shut down. I was under the impression you'd noticed.

doogie

You really aren’t very bright, are you.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

EXPERTS. snicker.

The smartest people in the world said 2.2 million dead in the US. And then some other smart people backtracked and said No, only 240,000 dead. And then those same smart people said, just joking, only 61,000 will die in the US.

The experts have flipped 180 on wearing masks, whether social distancing works or not. How it is transmitted, etc, etc.

There are no experts here. Only highly paid shills of Big Pharma that are simply winging it and acting in the interests of those that finance their 3rd home.

Shortly after the second plane hit the North Tower, one of the news anchors said, "We would like to get a Terrorism expert to comment. But today it's clear there are no experts in regards to predicting Terrorism"

2.2 million was Daddy's figure if we just did nothing.

Recall we did in fact shut down. I was under the impression you'd noticed.

That was your experts figure

Trump acted too late according to your crowd

HHusky

doogie said:

You really aren’t very bright, are you.

You're right. By now I should have recognized there will be no intelligent replies.

Kaepsknee

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

EXPERTS. snicker.

The smartest people in the world said 2.2 million dead in the US. And then some other smart people backtracked and said No, only 240,000 dead. And then those same smart people said, just joking, only 61,000 will die in the US.

The experts have flipped 180 on wearing masks, whether social distancing works or not. How it is transmitted, etc, etc.

There are no experts here. Only highly paid shills of Big Pharma that are simply winging it and acting in the interests of those that finance their 3rd home.

Shortly after the second plane hit the North Tower, one of the news anchors said, "We would like to get a Terrorism expert to comment. But today it's clear there are no experts in regards to predicting Terrorism"

2.2 million was Daddy's figure if we just did nothing.

Recall we did in fact shut down. I was under the impression you'd noticed.

No dickwad, That was the EXPERT at Imperial College.

Alexis

doogie said:

Lol, first paragraph:

It's hard to predict things in a pandemic. The situation changes so much on a daily basis that everything I thought I knew last week is wrong by the end of the day. Things are changing so fast that even the solid certainties that I thought we were sure of – the reproductive rate, the symptoms of the infection, the key to making a good quarantine – are suspect and need to be re-evaluated.

So, what they are saying is if you can't handle the ups and downs of a pandemic....