Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Further proof GrUnDLe WaS rIghT
Comments
-
Wait. Science is Now saying No second wave?
-
I want to believeGrundleStiltzkin said: -
I can’t remember if I was ranting here or to the handful of people IRL that will speak to me. I said back in March before the lockdowns that they’d eventually find a genetic predisposed vulnerability to the Vid. I might be wrong, it could be an immuno vulnerability.dnc said:
I want to believeGrundleStiltzkin said:
That study’s finding would provide an answer to a lot of questions. -
It funny reading these threads.
No upvotes or chins from HH, mello, fremont, gatorz, or any other known libs on positive news for society and health
They so desperately wanted this to be black plague 2.0 and the end of orange man
Like everything they hope for they get cock blocked -
It’s quite simple really, this could explain the intrinsic convex decline curve at a 10.8% seroprevalence.
-
Shit, of course, it was right there in front of me the whole tim.LoneStarDawg said:It’s quite simple really, this could explain the intrinsic convex decline curve at a 10.8% seroprevalence.
-
*This quote taken from Petersen goalline film study.LoneStarDawg said:It’s quite simple really, this could explain the intrinsic convex decline curve at a 10.8% seroprevalence.
-
We’re just joking about a global pandemic killing people every day, there’s no need to make it so darkDoogles said:
*This quote taken from Petersen goalline film study.LoneStarDawg said:It’s quite simple really, this could explain the intrinsic convex decline curve at a 10.8% seroprevalence.
