Bernie with common sense Coronavirus talk. Casualties may be higher than WW2 armed forces
Comments
-
Since you have a problem with reading comprehension the article and Bernie in the video referenced “CASUALTIES”, but accuracy and truth are not important to liberals when spinning a narrative.insinceredawg said:
GTFO with your facts and numbers. 70M deaths sounds better so I believe that!CallMeBigErn said:Just so we're clear, there were 15 million armed forces deaths in WWII with 416,800 from United States. Will we get there? Stay tuned to find out.
-
WikipediaCallMeBigErn said:Just so we're clear, there were 15 million armed forces deaths in WWII with 416,800 from United States. Will we get there? Stay tuned to find out.
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history. An estimated total of 70–85 million people perished, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion).[1]
Now maybe the commie lunatic was referencing military deaths only? It's your choice whether he wears a condom. -
Well since Bernie said "number of deaths" and "fatalities" right before he said that, I'm pretty sure he was talking about people dying aka not living anymore.DJDuck said:
Since you have a problem with reading comprehension the article and Bernie in the video referenced “CASUALTIES”, but accuracy and truth are not important to liberals when spinning a narrative.insinceredawg said:
GTFO with your facts and numbers. 70M deaths sounds better so I believe that!CallMeBigErn said:Just so we're clear, there were 15 million armed forces deaths in WWII with 416,800 from United States. Will we get there? Stay tuned to find out.
-
Yeah maybe he was considering he said that the number may be higher than what the ARMED FORCES experienced in WWII. You know, right there in the tweet.DuckHHunterisafag said:
WikipediaCallMeBigErn said:Just so we're clear, there were 15 million armed forces deaths in WWII with 416,800 from United States. Will we get there? Stay tuned to find out.
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history. An estimated total of 70–85 million people perished, which was about 3% of the 1940 world population (est. 2.3 billion).[1]
Now maybe the commie lunatic was referencing military deaths only? It's your choice whether he wears a condom. -
Whose armed forces? Did he specify US armed forces like right there in the twat? So according to you, Bernie now doesn't care about the world i ly the US. I guess that means no condom?
-
Don't know if he was referencing US or world and I don't give a fuck and neither should you.DuckHHunterisafag said:Whose armed forces? Did he specify US armed forces like right there in the twat? So according to you, Bernie now doesn't care about the world i ly the US. I guess that means no condom?
-
15 million people are not going to die
For fucks sake -
CallMeBigErn said:
Well since Bernie said "number of deaths" and "fatalities" right before he said that, I'm pretty sure he was talking about people dying aka not living anymore.DJDuck said:
Since you have a problem with reading comprehension the article and Bernie in the video referenced “CASUALTIES”, but accuracy and truth are not important to liberals when spinning a narrative.insinceredawg said:
GTFO with your facts and numbers. 70M deaths sounds better so I believe that!CallMeBigErn said:Just so we're clear, there were 15 million armed forces deaths in WWII with 416,800 from United States. Will we get there? Stay tuned to find out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFJCMIcZ_iU -
We should start a pool.RaceBannon said:15 million people are not going to die
For fucks sake
I’ll go with 1500 in the US. Though I think the count will be reported at somewhere around 5000. They’ll sneak a few regular flu deaths in there too. -
I'm sure he's thinking that the more panic the better. If the economy continues to tank, the better his chances for being elected, he thinks.DuckHHunterisafag said:What a fucking idiot. 70+ million are going to die from COVID19 now?
