Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Corona virus

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,906
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
Standard Supporter

Probably a bit overblown, but the R-naught discussion is pretty interesting.



UK Researcher Predicts Over 250,000 Chinese Will Have Coronavirus In Ten Days

Profile picture for user Tyler Durden

by Tyler Durden

Fri, 01/24/2020 - 18:12



When it comes to estimating the human capital and potential fallout from a highly contagious epidemic, arguably the most important variable is the R0 ("R-naught") value of the disease, which represents the average number of secondary cases arising from an average primary case in a entirely susceptible population. That's the technical definition, a simpler one is that the R0, or basic reproductive number, of a contagious disease is the number of cases that a case of the disease generates over the course of its infectious period in a susceptible population. The higher this number, the more dangerous the disease, the more lethal the outcome.



Some indicative R0s are 0.9 – 2.1 for the common flu while the 1918-1919 pandemic-causing Spanish flu was estimated to have ranged from 1.4 – 2.8, with a mean of 2. Some other notable R0s are shown below, and note that SARS was between 2 and 5:





https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/uk-researcher-predicts-over-250000-people-china-will-have-coronavirus-ten-days







Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.