Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

"No One Is Trying to Take Your Guns"

GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Standard Supporter
House Bill 2240 would ban the manufacture, possession, sale, transfer, etc. of magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. This measure is strongly supported by the Governor and the Attorney General, and would severely limit your ability to defend yourself and your loved ones. This is the companion bill to Senate Bill 6077, which the Senate Law & Justice Committee will hear on January 20th.

House Bill 2241 would ban certain semi-automatic rifles and magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. HB 2241, like its predecessors, would do nothing to impact crime or keep Washingtonians safer.

House Bill 2519 would ban online sales of ammunition, and potentially require background checks for all ammunition purchases. This bill comes on the heels of California’s failed ammunition background check system and is being supported by the Attorney General.

House Bill 1374 would abolish Washington’s decades old state preemption statute, allowing localities to pass any gun control measures they see fit. Repealing preemption would lead to a confusing patchwork of local laws, making it extremely difficult for even the most well-meaning, and otherwise law-abiding, gun owners to avoid inadvertently becoming criminals. The hearing will be held on a substitute bill that has not yet been released.

House Bill 1315 would require onerous government red tape and further training to obtain a Concealed Pistol License. Training requirements are yet another cost prohibitive measure intended to ensure that lower income Americans are barred from defending themselves. The hearing will be held on a substitute bill that has not yet been released.
Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,745
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    The left wants them all. Name a communist country with private gun ownership. That's where they want to take us. We're in their way.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    And HB9876 in Texas says they want to secede from the union. Your point?
  • Options
    Postal91Postal91 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,731
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2020
    2001400ex said:

    And HB9876 in Texas says they want to secede from the union. Your point?

    It's the subject line of the post. JFC
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 33,909
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Think of the reduction in crime if we could disarm pours. The rich can keep ‘em.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited January 2020

    Name ONE person in power who's coming for your guns

    In power, running for President, leading in the polls, who has authored legislation that compels gun confiscation.

    Until then, fuck off.

    Nobody wants to take away your guns
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    House Bill 2240 would ban the manufacture, possession, sale, transfer, etc. of magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. This measure is strongly supported by the Governor and the Attorney General, and would severely limit your ability to defend yourself and your loved ones. This is the companion bill to Senate Bill 6077, which the Senate Law & Justice Committee will hear on January 20th.

    House Bill 2241 would ban certain semi-automatic rifles and magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. HB 2241, like its predecessors, would do nothing to impact crime or keep Washingtonians safer.

    House Bill 2519 would ban online sales of ammunition, and potentially require background checks for all ammunition purchases. This bill comes on the heels of California’s failed ammunition background check system and is being supported by the Attorney General.

    House Bill 1374 would abolish Washington’s decades old state preemption statute, allowing localities to pass any gun control measures they see fit. Repealing preemption would lead to a confusing patchwork of local laws, making it extremely difficult for even the most well-meaning, and otherwise law-abiding, gun owners to avoid inadvertently becoming criminals. The hearing will be held on a substitute bill that has not yet been released.

    House Bill 1315 would require onerous government red tape and further training to obtain a Concealed Pistol License. Training requirements are yet another cost prohibitive measure intended to ensure that lower income Americans are barred from defending themselves. The hearing will be held on a substitute bill that has not yet been released.
    Read the actual bills. Your news source is wrong.

    https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=2240&Initiative=false&Year=2019

    https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=6077&Chamber=Senate&Year=2019

    http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2019-20/Pdf/Bills/House Bills/2241.pdf

    https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=2519&Initiative=false&Year=2019

    https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=1374&Initiative=false&Year=2019

    https://apps.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/?BillNumber=1315&Year=2019&Initiative=false
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Postal91 said:

    2001400ex said:

    And HB9876 in Texas says they want to secede from the union. Your point?

    It's the subject line of the post. JFC
    And you clearly missed my point.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Anyone who doesn't think the left wants to disarm the citizens is an idiot. They do it under the guise of public safety and "someone think of the children" emotional horseshit. That's not the real reason and anyone with half a brain and isn't prone to emotional meltdowns knows it.

    I've literally heard that my entire adult life. It's going to happen any day now.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Anyone who doesn't think the left wants to disarm the citizens is an idiot. They do it under the guise of public safety and "someone think of the children" emotional horseshit. That's not the real reason and anyone with half a brain and isn't prone to emotional meltdowns knows it.

    Ask a Venezuelan if they aren't dead

    Gun control became mandatory. A disarmed citizenry became easy pickings for tyranny of the left and the death of dissenters

    Same as it ever was. Without force leftists can't rule because their ideas fail every time

    Morons dispute this simple fact
    That’s literally the only way it could happen. Do you the new left (the squad) wants an armed population. There is no way they can implement their goals (communism) with an armed citizenry.

    Name ONE country that went commie where citizens are armed.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,745
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Think of the reduction in crime if we could disarm pours. The rich can keep ‘em.

    That was history. Gun laws were used against blacks after slavery ended. Guess which party for a cold beer?
  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 33,909
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Sledog said:

    Think of the reduction in crime if we could disarm pours. The rich can keep ‘em.

    That was history. Gun laws were used against blacks after slavery ended. Guess which party for a cold beer?
    The VA legislature was considering gradual emancipation in the late 1820s. Then Nat Turner got a hold of some guns. Didn’t work out well now did it?

    Guns or no guns only the federal government could have protected the freed slaves. And the north lost the will to keep troops on the south after the early 1870s.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,904
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Leftards lie and love to be lied to. Opposition to gun confiscation is among their leading lies. Free speech and the right to bear arms were for some reason the first of the 10 amendments.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,904
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Dems win then vote for legislation for a 15 member court and approve 6 commie judges. Game over without armed insurrection.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,745
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Leftards lie and love to be lied to. Opposition to gun confiscation is among their leading lies. Free speech and the right to bear arms were for some reason the first of the 10 amendments.

    Guns speak for free men. Subjects don't own guns and aren't free to speak.
Sign In or Register to comment.