Lol at one spot behind Oregon. How do they come up with this shit? They won the PAC 12 and the Rose Bowl. We went 8-5 and played in the Vegas Bowl.
I get that it is supposed to be a true measure of how good a team Oregon and UW were. I would even agree that Oregon is not much better than us. That’s why it was a close game when we played. Results are results tho. Fuck off saying an 8-5 UW team was anywhere close to as good as Oregon.
Aren't the S&P+ rankings an average of the last five years? Our results both on the field and recruiting-wise probably averages out to be on the same level as Oregon in that period.
The issue is we're trending down and they're trending up, which isn't necessarily reflected in S&P+.
The issue is that metrics have ZERO meaning between Washington & Oregon in 2019. They beat usº and won the conference and won the Rose Bowl. The only metric with any meaning is 12-2 vs 8-5.
Lol at one spot behind Oregon. How do they come up with this shit? They won the PAC 12 and the Rose Bowl. We went 8-5 and played in the Vegas Bowl.
I get that it is supposed to be a true measure of how good a team Oregon and UW were. I would even agree that Oregon is not much better than us. That’s why it was a close game when we played. Results are results tho. Fuck off saying an 8-5 UW team was anywhere close to as good as Oregon.
Aren't the S&P+ rankings an average of the last five years? Our results both on the field and recruiting-wise probably averages out to be on the same level as Oregon in that period.
The issue is we're trending down and they're trending up, which isn't necessarily reflected in S&P+.
The issue is that metrics have ZERO meaning between Washington & Oregon in 2019. They beat usº and won the conference and won the Rose Bowl. The only metric with any meaning is 12-2 vs 8-5.
I thought we found out advanced metrics don't mean shit when Chester left with his SRS
Kwat was so high on Ngata. His best game was against Auburn and he did almost nothing after that.
He seemed incapable of putting on the weight necessary to play OLB. Never got over 220
Kwat said that didn’t matter and he was the guy with natural pass rushing skills. It would be disappointing if he left and it seems like we kind of blew it with him.
Lol at one spot behind Oregon. How do they come up with this shit? They won the PAC 12 and the Rose Bowl. We went 8-5 and played in the Vegas Bowl.
I get that it is supposed to be a true measure of how good a team Oregon and UW were. I would even agree that Oregon is not much better than us. That’s why it was a close game when we played. Results are results tho. Fuck off saying an 8-5 UW team was anywhere close to as good as Oregon.
Aren't the S&P+ rankings an average of the last five years? Our results both on the field and recruiting-wise probably averages out to be on the same level as Oregon in that period.
The issue is we're trending down and they're trending up, which isn't necessarily reflected in S&P+.
The issue is that metrics have ZERO meaning between Washington & Oregon in 2019. They beat usº and won the conference and won the Rose Bowl. The only metric with any meaning is 12-2 vs 8-5.
Obviously they don’t mean shit for accomplishments. Nobody hands out an S&P+ championship belt.
The metrics are for looking forward and predicting future results.
Lol at one spot behind Oregon. How do they come up with this shit? They won the PAC 12 and the Rose Bowl. We went 8-5 and played in the Vegas Bowl.
I get that it is supposed to be a true measure of how good a team Oregon and UW were. I would even agree that Oregon is not much better than us. That’s why it was a close game when we played. Results are results tho. Fuck off saying an 8-5 UW team was anywhere close to as good as Oregon.
Aren't the S&P+ rankings an average of the last five years? Our results both on the field and recruiting-wise probably averages out to be on the same level as Oregon in that period.
The issue is we're trending down and they're trending up, which isn't necessarily reflected in S&P+.
The issue is that metrics have ZERO meaning between Washington & Oregon in 2019. They beat usº and won the conference and won the Rose Bowl. The only metric with any meaning is 12-2 vs 8-5.
I thought we found out advanced metrics don't mean shit when Chester left with his SRS
Lol at one spot behind Oregon. How do they come up with this shit? They won the PAC 12 and the Rose Bowl. We went 8-5 and played in the Vegas Bowl.
I get that it is supposed to be a true measure of how good a team Oregon and UW were. I would even agree that Oregon is not much better than us. That’s why it was a close game when we played. Results are results tho. Fuck off saying an 8-5 UW team was anywhere close to as good as Oregon.
Aren't the S&P+ rankings an average of the last five years? Our results both on the field and recruiting-wise probably averages out to be on the same level as Oregon in that period.
The issue is we're trending down and they're trending up, which isn't necessarily reflected in S&P+.
The issue is that metrics have ZERO meaning between Washington & Oregon in 2019. They beat usº and won the conference and won the Rose Bowl. The only metric with any meaning is 12-2 vs 8-5.
Obviously they don’t mean shit for accomplishments. Nobody hands out an S&P+ championship belt.
The metrics are for looking forward and predicting future results.
No one was harder on Chest than me but weren't we killing him during Petersen's first two years for saying the metrics were positive for the future and then we had the magical season of 2016?
Turning recruiting up to 11. Since he’s taken over I’ve noticed the social media presence has gone up tenfold. Husky twitter, coach retweets, etc. Cato has been all over it, and I noticed when Glenn got the promotion all the coaches were retwatting it.
Turning recruiting up to 11. Since he’s taken over I’ve noticed the social media presence has gone up tenfold. Husky twitter, coach retweets, etc. Cato has been all over it, and I noticed when Glenn got the promotion all the coaches were retwatting it.
There has been a clear message sent by Lake to all coaches and staff that social media presence is a requirement going forward. They may not like it and a lot around here may say it’s Sark sizzle shit, but it’s clear it matters to the kids. Lake is trying to get some enthusiasm and momentum around the program with the huge in-state talent coming up.
This is all a new experience as this time of year was when Pete would take time off of recruiting while other teams were heating up. But with the spring game back on, the huge Junior day, and the interviews have shown Lake is hungry.
It will help in recruiting, and it’s been working for Oregon.
But it means nothing if they don’t win on the field.
There has been a clear message sent by Lake to all coaches and staff that social media presence is a requirement going forward. They may not like it and a lot around here may say it’s Sark sizzle shit, but it’s clear it matters to the kids. Lake is trying to get some enthusiasm and momentum around the program with the huge in-state talent coming up.
This is all a new experience as this time of year was when Pete would take time off of recruiting while other teams were heating up. But with the spring game back on, the huge Junior day, and the interviews have shown Lake is hungry.
It will help in recruiting, and it’s been working for Oregon.
But it means nothing if they don’t win on the field.
It’s the easiest way to stay in constant contact with the guys you are recruiting. It’s a necessity.
There has been a clear message sent by Lake to all coaches and staff that social media presence is a requirement going forward. They may not like it and a lot around here may say it’s Sark sizzle shit, but it’s clear it matters to the kids. Lake is trying to get some enthusiasm and momentum around the program with the huge in-state talent coming up.
This is all a new experience as this time of year was when Pete would take time off of recruiting while other teams were heating up. But with the spring game back on, the huge Junior day, and the interviews have shown Lake is hungry.
It will help in recruiting, and it’s been working for Oregon.
But it means nothing if they don’t win on the field.
It’s the easiest way to stay in constant contact with the guys you are recruiting. It’s a necessity.
It's a bizarre loophole in the contact limits, if our coaches are failing at Twitter they're recruiting from behind the 8 ball.
Comments
The metrics are for looking forward and predicting future results.
All this is fine until we lose to Oregon again
Jimmy doing his best to infuse some fucking life into the program.
I wonder if he planned that...
This is so fucking infuriating. With any semblance of an offense, and there is another PAC championship and 2 big bowl wins.
I wish I could quit this fucking team. I know I never will and that is depressing.
Turning recruiting up to 11. Since he’s taken over I’ve noticed the social media presence has gone up tenfold. Husky twitter, coach retweets, etc. Cato has been all over it, and I noticed when Glenn got the promotion all the coaches were retwatting it.
Even Gregory has been at it.
Yup, and everyone on staff is just at it.
There has been a clear message sent by Lake to all coaches and staff that social media presence is a requirement going forward. They may not like it and a lot around here may say it’s Sark sizzle shit, but it’s clear it matters to the kids. Lake is trying to get some enthusiasm and momentum around the program with the huge in-state talent coming up.
This is all a new experience as this time of year was when Pete would take time off of recruiting while other teams were heating up. But with the spring game back on, the huge Junior day, and the interviews have shown Lake is hungry.
It will help in recruiting, and it’s been working for Oregon.
But it means nothing if they don’t win on the field.