Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
FISA Court slams FBI
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
FISA court slams FBI conduct in Carter Page surveillance warrant applications
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-conduct/index.html
“ The typically ultra-close-lipped Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court slammed the FBI for mistakes it made in the Carter Page surveillance warrants and ordered the agency to detail how it will improve its warrant submissions in light of the errors, uncovered recently by the Justice Department's inspector general.
"The FBI's handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the OIG report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above. The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable," federal Judge Rosemary Collier wrote in an opinion for the court published Tuesday.
The FBI has until January 10 to respond.
This story is breaking and will be updated.”
IT MAKES ME THINK OF ALL THE LIBERAL MORONS THAT DEFENDED THE FBI. WE HAVEN’T EVEN GOTTEN TO THE DURHAM REPORT EITHER.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-conduct/index.html
“ The typically ultra-close-lipped Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court slammed the FBI for mistakes it made in the Carter Page surveillance warrants and ordered the agency to detail how it will improve its warrant submissions in light of the errors, uncovered recently by the Justice Department's inspector general.
"The FBI's handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the OIG report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above. The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable," federal Judge Rosemary Collier wrote in an opinion for the court published Tuesday.
The FBI has until January 10 to respond.
This story is breaking and will be updated.”
IT MAKES ME THINK OF ALL THE LIBERAL MORONS THAT DEFENDED THE FBI. WE HAVEN’T EVEN GOTTEN TO THE DURHAM REPORT EITHER.
Comments
I don't think anyone said there wasn't paperwork errors in the FISA application. But you're news source said the dossier was illegally used and Obama and Hillary were involved. Which are lies. Liar.
Nothing to see here
Chalk it up to human error I guess.
You ignorant moron an FBI lawyer criminally altered a memo from the CIA to the FBI to totally change the information from, Carter Page was working WITH the CIA to Carter Page WAS NOT working with the CIA. You call that a “paperwork error you dumb Piece of Shit!😂😂😂
FBI lawyer under criminal investigation altered document to say Carter Page 'was not a source' for another agency
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/fbi-lawyer-under-criminal-investigation-altered-document-to-say-carter-page-was-not-a-source-for-another-agency
The FBI committed criminal acts and the Democrats ran interference for them just like you are doing right now. To keep up with your charade will only show you as as the ignorant partisan you are and lead to more embarrassment for yourself. Your posts are insipid and stupid.
Shortly after the FBI opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, the FBI conducted several consensually monitored meetings between FBI confidential human sources (CHS) and individuals affiliated with the Trump campaign, including a high-level campaign official who was not a subject of the investigation. We found that the CHS operations received the necessary approvals under FBI policy; that an Assistant Director knew about and approved of each operation, even in circumstances where a first-level supervisory special agent could have approved the operations; and that the operations were permitted under Department and FBI policy because their use was not for the sole purpose of monitoring activities protected by the First Amendment or the lawful exercise of other rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. We did not find any documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI's decision to conduct these operations. Additionally, we found no evidence that the FBI attempted to place any CHSs within the Trump campaign, recruit members of the Trump campaign as CHSs, or task CHSs to report on the Trump campaign.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fisa-court-issues-rare-public-order-condemning-fbi-for-russia-probe-abuses-and-demanding-reforms/
“ In a rare public order issued Tuesday, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court condemned the FBI for the errors and omissions in its application to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page and gave the bureau until January 10th to propose reforms to prevent future abuses.
The order follows the release of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report, which detailed 17 “significant errors and omissions” in the warrant application to surveil Page.
“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” wrote the FISA court.
“Therefore, the Court orders that the government shall, no later than January 10, 2020, inform the Court in a sworn written submission of what it has done, and plans to do, to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application,” the order continues.”
You are still cowardly avoiding what you claimed were merely paperwork kerfuffles. Are you daft or just avoiding the subject here. You are getting your ignorant narratives jammed up your ass. When the Durham report comes out you should go hide in shame nutjob.😂😂😂😂😂