Scoreboard, baby...

pawz

GDS said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

When I see Rasmussen polls, I like to remember they were the ONLY poll within the allowable margin of error in the run up to 2016. I like to remember that.

5. More. Years.

False.

Rasmussen polling showed the repubs keeping the house in 2018....oops

False?

Please explain how a house poll in 2018 invalidates the presidential poll two years earlier.

It doesn’t. Which is why I didn’t post that it did. What was false from Pawz post was his claim that Rasmussen was the only poll which got the final result within the polls margin of error.

2018 Rasmussen polling (along with prior years) shows 2016 was an anomaly for Rasmussen not the norm. HTH

PandaOrangeChiknDuck

GDS said:

PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

When I see Rasmussen polls, I like to remember they were the ONLY poll within the allowable margin of error in the run up to 2016. I like to remember that.

5. More. Years.

False.

Rasmussen polling showed the repubs keeping the house in 2018....oops

False?

Please explain how a house poll in 2018 invalidates the presidential poll two years earlier.

It doesn’t. Which is why I didn’t post that it did. What was false from Pawz post was his claim that Rasmussen was the only poll which got the final result within the polls margin of error.

2018 Rasmussen polling (along with prior years) shows 2016 was an anomaly for Rasmussen not the norm. HTH

They’re two different polls genius. There’s one for the house, one for the senate, and the presidential poll. He said Rasmussen was spot on for the presidential poll. He said nothing about a senate or house poll, which is a much different voting dynamic. Nice strawman!