Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Underachievers R Us

13»

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    FireCohen said:

    I love it. Pete’s legacy was build on making more with less, but his last year he decided to do make less with more

    YVBFEE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bigcc
    bigcc Member Posts: 900
    Coaching was an issue, but each of those 5 losses are winnable with solid lb play

    Cal-192 rushing, 2 tds, 1 point game
    Stanford 189/1, 10 point game
    Oregon 154/1, 4 point game
    Utah 115/2, 5 points
    Colorado 206/1, 6 points

    A part of that was inability to set the edge, but with even decent lb play you probably take 4 of those, unfair to blame the team for underachieving when one position group was so much worse than the others

    I'm sure Petersen would have coached his way out of a couple anyways, but the point remains
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    Stanford was just a weird game we were destined to lose because we're a bunch of limp catamites. I'd legitimately argue every other L fell on extremely terrible in-game coaching decisions, including personnel choices and lineups. Just a ghastly level of failure in a season where it was imperative we level up on the field and begin harvesting the '20-'21 in-state recruiting classes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Gladstone said:

    Stanford was just a weird game we were destined to lose because we're a bunch of limp catamites. I'd legitimately argue every other L fell on extremely terrible in-game coaching decisions, including personnel choices and lineups. Just a ghastly level of failure in a season where it was imperative we level up on the field and begin harvesting the '20-'21 in-state recruiting classes.

    Poor coaching
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,634 Swaye's Wigwam
    Gladstone said:

    Stanford was just a weird game we were destined to lose because we're a bunch of limp catamites. I'd legitimately argue every other L fell on extremely terrible in-game coaching decisions, including personnel choices and lineups. Just a ghastly level of failure in a season where it was imperative we level up on the field and begin harvesting the '20-'21 in-state recruiting classes.

    I would almost put Colorado in the same tier as Stanford. We got beat pretty much the entire game.

    For a short while, we played pretty well against Cal. We played our best, or at least close to it, in both the first halves vs Oregon and Utah. Shit the bed in both those games in the 2nd half, but we didn’t look like a less talented team in either.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,699
    You guys lost to Colorado?
    Did not know that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 79smoothdawg
    79smoothdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 725 Swaye's Wigwam
    Pitchfork51 said:

    You guys lost to Colorado?
    Did not know that

    I read that too and thought "did we really? Ido t remember that." Jeezus what a shitty coaching job that was
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter