Hey Owl, what happened to your claims about full employment?
Comments
-
Go read an economics book. Maybe Mike can help you.
-
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
Care to educate Bob on what economists consider full employment?MikeDamone said:
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
Total Domination of Subject?MikeDamone said:
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
Care to fuck a little more strawman ass while you tongue Owl's ass?2001400ex said:
Care to educate Bob on what economists consider full employment?MikeDamone said:
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
You talked out your fucking ass all in a pathetic attempt to blow Obama. Take the L cocksucker.HustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
Honda's tongue must be one tired bitch with all the ass tonguing and shit talking. Cuts down on the food bills though.SFGbob said:
Care to fuck a little more strawman ass while you tongue Owl's ass?2001400ex said:
Care to educate Bob on what economists consider full employment?MikeDamone said:
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that? -
This is seriously embarrassing Bob and shows you've never had any education in economics.SFGbob said:
Care to fuck a little more strawman ass while you tongue Owl's ass?2001400ex said:
Care to educate Bob on what economists consider full employment?MikeDamone said:
This is what TDS looks likeHustlinOwl said:
Actually I said may economist consider 5% full employment, but whatever. Yes now there are an additional 3 people out of every 200 working. That's just noise, we've been at full employment for years.SFGbob said:Hell I remember when Owl would blow Obama and claim that anything under 6% was essentially full employment. How has the rate continued to drop Owl when according to you we were at full employment 5 years ago?
What happens if China folds up and sends 20 million minimum wage jobs back to the US. We ready for that?
