Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kamala Harris drops out

135

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
    Fuck off. Your disengenuous, false equivalence shtick is beyond old.

    The next time you bring something of value to the bored will be the first time. 28000 shit takes later. And you still haven't donated this year for your right to spam the bored with your Hillary Clinton paid for bullshit.

    Die. Or go infect some other corner of the internet.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
    Fuck off. Your disengenuous, false equivalence shtick is beyond old.

    The next time you bring something of value to the bored will be the first time. 28000 shit takes later. And you still haven't donated this year for your right to spam the bored with your Hillary Clinton paid for bullshit.

    Die. Or go infect some other corner of the internet.
    Meltdown.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
    Fuck off. Your disengenuous, false equivalence shtick is beyond old.

    The next time you bring something of value to the bored will be the first time. 28000 shit takes later. And you still haven't donated this year for your right to spam the bored with your Hillary Clinton paid for bullshit.

    Die. Or go infect some other corner of the internet.
    Meltdown.
    Says who? You?


    Fuck off.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
    Fuck off. Your disengenuous, false equivalence shtick is beyond old.

    The next time you bring something of value to the bored will be the first time. 28000 shit takes later. And you still haven't donated this year for your right to spam the bored with your Hillary Clinton paid for bullshit.

    Die. Or go infect some other corner of the internet.
    Meltdown.
    Says who? You?


    Fuck off.
    It's obvious to everyone. But you.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Finally! Trump can confront one of his jurors at his impeachment trial. It’s what you trump trash have been hoping for all along.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,559 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Nice false equivalence as always.

    Fuck off.
    Why? Because they are a party that tries for equal pay/rights for women and minorities, they have to nominate a woman or minority for president? Is that what you are trying to say?
    Since the blacks abandoned the party they were historically linked to for free shit it makes it harder.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    89ute said:

    2001400ex said:

    So the hardcore intersectional left has a bunch of old white dudes and an old white chick guilty of appropriation.

    Shocker

    Question. When has the right nominated someone other than a white dude?
    Because nominating someone based on skin color is FS AND racist.