Closing the gates will surely stop the drift towards socialism
- Social Security Act, 1935
- The Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 which created the Community Action Program, Job Corps and Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA), centerpiece of the "war on poverty" – August 20, 1964
- Food Stamp Act of 1964 – August 31, 1964[3]
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act – April 11, 1965
- Social Security Act 1965 (Created Medicare and Medicaid) – July 19, 1965
Comments
-
No doubt Wilson is OBKs favorite president.YellowSnow said:It worked well @oregonblitzkrieg when we closed the gates from 1924- 65.
- Social Security Act, 1935
- The Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 which created the Community Action Program, Job Corps and Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA), centerpiece of the "war on poverty" – August 20, 1964
- Food Stamp Act of 1964 – August 31, 1964[3]
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act – April 11, 1965
- Social Security Act 1965 (Created Medicare and Medicaid) – July 19, 1965
-
The Latinos will put us over the top. I'm sure of it.
-
Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here. -
@Dennis_DeYoung had a great post a while back on why some countries are very corrupt and why others are less so. The short answer: Protestant countries way less corrupt the Catholic ones. https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/676144#Comment_676144oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
If you look at corruption ranking (worldbank is fine) and per capita GDP in the world, the correlation is like -.85. The only other factor that moves the needle much is oil wealth (hence why Alaska, North Dickcota and Wyoming aren't on the shit-bag list for the US).
Also, if you look out at the world, the major economic story of the world is pretty much this: shit happened, then protestants happened, this tamped corruption down severely and taught people to read, then you had the enlightenment and industrial revolution. This is where all the fucking world GDP comes from.
Outside of countries with either deep protestant trading ties or majority protestants (this has been shown in an excellent 2000 paper at the fucking COUNTY level), there is only ONE FUCKING CUNTRY that has a good economy (and they are also without severe corruption; every place is corrupt, it's just the severity that makes such a big difference): JAPAN.
(Every other country with a decent economy can be directly tied to protestant involvement at some point)
Japan has been the only country to get rid of corruption without the PWE and Germany fucking invented it.
The protestant Germans are sofa king good at life that they rose out of the ashes twice to become dominant. After 1945 they rose so fucking hard, they merged with shit-ball EGerm (who had been infiltrated by corrupt shit-ball commies) and their PCGDP is STILL one of the best in the world. They are basically 15k ahead of East Germany in PCGDP to this fucking day.
It's amazing what you can do when you have a literate, education population who aren't corrupt. -
It just keeps getting better. JFC.oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
80 - 90% of Latina America counties are not Communist Socialist you racist fuck. “It’s in their DNA”. No...you’re not racist. You just think you’re superior. Ignorant racist fuck.
“The regional grouping, called the Union of South American Nations, was founded in 2008 and funded by Hugo Chavez’s then-oil rich Venezuela. The group aimed at spreading Chavez’s “socialism for the 21st century” throughout South America.”
“In the years since Chavez’s death and the destruction of Venezuela by his socialist policies, the rest of South America has wised up and elected center-right presidents in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia. All of them favor market democracy over socialist populism.”
https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/commentary/latin-america-pivoting-socialism-freedom -
I guess it's in Russian, German and Chinese DNA too.MikeDamone said:
It just keeps getting better. JFC.oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
80 - 90% of Latina America counties are not Communist Socialist you racist fuck. “It’s in their DNA”. No...you’re not racist. You just think you’re superior. Ignorant racist fuck.
“The regional grouping, called the Union of South American Nations, was founded in 2008 and funded by Hugo Chavez’s then-oil rich Venezuela. The group aimed at spreading Chavez’s “socialism for the 21st century” throughout South America.”
“In the years since Chavez’s death and the destruction of Venezuela by his socialist policies, the rest of South America has wised up and elected center-right presidents in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia. All of them favor market democracy over socialist populism.”
https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/commentary/latin-america-pivoting-socialism-freedom -
OBK is a bitch and won’t stand by his 80-90% of Latin America countries are communist/socialist because it’s in their DNA comment. List them for us OBK.creepycoug said:
I guess it's in Russian, German and Chinese DNA too.MikeDamone said:
It just keeps getting better. JFC.oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
80 - 90% of Latina America counties are not Communist Socialist you racist fuck. “It’s in their DNA”. No...you’re not racist. You just think you’re superior. Ignorant racist fuck.
“The regional grouping, called the Union of South American Nations, was founded in 2008 and funded by Hugo Chavez’s then-oil rich Venezuela. The group aimed at spreading Chavez’s “socialism for the 21st century” throughout South America.”
“In the years since Chavez’s death and the destruction of Venezuela by his socialist policies, the rest of South America has wised up and elected center-right presidents in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia. All of them favor market democracy over socialist populism.”
https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/commentary/latin-america-pivoting-socialism-freedom -
Dennis De Young is a racist who was in charge of the recruiting board on Hard Core Husky. Not this website's finest hour.YellowSnow said:
@Dennis_DeYoung had a great post a while back on why some countries are very corrupt and why others are less so. The short answer: Protestant countries way less corrupt the Catholic ones. https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/676144#Comment_676144oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
If you look at corruption ranking (worldbank is fine) and per capita GDP in the world, the correlation is like -.85. The only other factor that moves the needle much is oil wealth (hence why Alaska, North Dickcota and Wyoming aren't on the shit-bag list for the US).
Also, if you look out at the world, the major economic story of the world is pretty much this: shit happened, then protestants happened, this tamped corruption down severely and taught people to read, then you had the enlightenment and industrial revolution. This is where all the fucking world GDP comes from.
Outside of countries with either deep protestant trading ties or majority protestants (this has been shown in an excellent 2000 paper at the fucking COUNTY level), there is only ONE FUCKING CUNTRY that has a good economy (and they are also without severe corruption; every place is corrupt, it's just the severity that makes such a big difference): JAPAN.
(Every other country with a decent economy can be directly tied to protestant involvement at some point)
Japan has been the only country to get rid of corruption without the PWE and Germany fucking invented it.
The protestant Germans are sofa king good at life that they rose out of the ashes twice to become dominant. After 1945 they rose so fucking hard, they merged with shit-ball EGerm (who had been infiltrated by corrupt shit-ball commies) and their PCGDP is STILL one of the best in the world. They are basically 15k ahead of East Germany in PCGDP to this fucking day.
It's amazing what you can do when you have a literate, education population who aren't corrupt. -
I think you’ve been wooshed if you believe DDY is racist in real life.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dennis De Young is a racist who was in charge of the recruiting board on Hard Core Husky. Not this website's finest hour.YellowSnow said:
@Dennis_DeYoung had a great post a while back on why some countries are very corrupt and why others are less so. The short answer: Protestant countries way less corrupt the Catholic ones. https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/676144#Comment_676144oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
If you look at corruption ranking (worldbank is fine) and per capita GDP in the world, the correlation is like -.85. The only other factor that moves the needle much is oil wealth (hence why Alaska, North Dickcota and Wyoming aren't on the shit-bag list for the US).
Also, if you look out at the world, the major economic story of the world is pretty much this: shit happened, then protestants happened, this tamped corruption down severely and taught people to read, then you had the enlightenment and industrial revolution. This is where all the fucking world GDP comes from.
Outside of countries with either deep protestant trading ties or majority protestants (this has been shown in an excellent 2000 paper at the fucking COUNTY level), there is only ONE FUCKING CUNTRY that has a good economy (and they are also without severe corruption; every place is corrupt, it's just the severity that makes such a big difference): JAPAN.
(Every other country with a decent economy can be directly tied to protestant involvement at some point)
Japan has been the only country to get rid of corruption without the PWE and Germany fucking invented it.
The protestant Germans are sofa king good at life that they rose out of the ashes twice to become dominant. After 1945 they rose so fucking hard, they merged with shit-ball EGerm (who had been infiltrated by corrupt shit-ball commies) and their PCGDP is STILL one of the best in the world. They are basically 15k ahead of East Germany in PCGDP to this fucking day.
It's amazing what you can do when you have a literate, education population who aren't corrupt. -
Sounds familiar. But I have no intention of looking into the context behind his posts, or the actual meaning of the things he's said. I'm only interested in finding racism where it may not actually exist, and then calling people racists in order to smear them. Whether or not he's an actual racist doesn't really matter.YellowSnow said:
I think you’ve been wooshed if you believe DDY is racist in real life.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Dennis De Young is a racist who was in charge of the recruiting board on Hard Core Husky. Not this website's finest hour.YellowSnow said:
@Dennis_DeYoung had a great post a while back on why some countries are very corrupt and why others are less so. The short answer: Protestant countries way less corrupt the Catholic ones. https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/676144#Comment_676144oregonblitzkrieg said:Roosevelt was a flaming socialist. But you know what I'm talking about when I refer to socialism/communism, it's a whole different brand in Latin America. Venezuela is a case in point.
The latino racist claims its not in the DNA. But is this really true? Why are 80 to 90 percent of Latin American countries (including Mexico) either socialist or communist?
It takes no great leap of logic to conclude that importing the cultures that produce these failed social and economic systems on a massive scale via open borders will end in the same result here.
If you look at corruption ranking (worldbank is fine) and per capita GDP in the world, the correlation is like -.85. The only other factor that moves the needle much is oil wealth (hence why Alaska, North Dickcota and Wyoming aren't on the shit-bag list for the US).
Also, if you look out at the world, the major economic story of the world is pretty much this: shit happened, then protestants happened, this tamped corruption down severely and taught people to read, then you had the enlightenment and industrial revolution. This is where all the fucking world GDP comes from.
Outside of countries with either deep protestant trading ties or majority protestants (this has been shown in an excellent 2000 paper at the fucking COUNTY level), there is only ONE FUCKING CUNTRY that has a good economy (and they are also without severe corruption; every place is corrupt, it's just the severity that makes such a big difference): JAPAN.
(Every other country with a decent economy can be directly tied to protestant involvement at some point)
Japan has been the only country to get rid of corruption without the PWE and Germany fucking invented it.
The protestant Germans are sofa king good at life that they rose out of the ashes twice to become dominant. After 1945 they rose so fucking hard, they merged with shit-ball EGerm (who had been infiltrated by corrupt shit-ball commies) and their PCGDP is STILL one of the best in the world. They are basically 15k ahead of East Germany in PCGDP to this fucking day.
It's amazing what you can do when you have a literate, education population who aren't corrupt.
I just want to be like Mike.
