Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Festivus Pole in Madison Wisconsin...
Comments
-
The war against Christmas!!!11!1
-
-
Christmas has almost nothing to do with Christianity. Both sides are pretty fucked up over this
-
Don't support christmas tree murder.
-
ACLU vs Allegheny County pretty much answers the religious displays at public buildings question.
Supreme Court case superiority guy. -
When I was a kid my two dads and I would go down to Capital Lake for the lighting of the Christmas display. The Republic survived. Then we'd kill Jews and Muslims on the way home
-
From a guy who attacks little girls with Festivus Poles? Consider yourself added to my list of grievances.CollegeDoog said:ACLU vs Allegheny County pretty much answers the religious displays at public buildings question.
Supreme Court case superiority guy.
BTW, your citation form is wrong. The case is County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, (1989). Holding, "[a] creche display has that unconstitutional effect, but [we] reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment regarding the menorah display".
Considering that it was a 5-4 decision from 1989, with Kennedy writing for the dissent, I wouldn't push it. It would very likely be overturned if a similar case came up for certiorari. The discussion of "Merry Christmas" is clearly dicta, having no legal weight.
HTH
-
Seriously? Citation form superiority guy? I posted from my fone and couldn't remember which party brought the case to the court.PRedoubt said:
From a guy who attacks little girls with Festivus Poles? Consider yourself added to my list of grievances.CollegeDoog said:ACLU vs Allegheny County pretty much answers the religious displays at public buildings question.
Supreme Court case superiority guy.
BTW, your citation form is wrong. The case is County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, (1989). Holding that, "[a] creche display has that unconstitutional effect, but [we] reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment regarding the menorah display".
Considering that it was a 5-4 decision from 1989, with Kennedy writing for the dissent, I wouldn't push it. It would very likely be overturned if a similar case came up for certiorari.
That's some first rate faggotry. -
Just trying to be helpful. You also didn't use italics; you used vs. instead of v.; and you didn't cite the case number. Any Judge in America would crucify you for any of those. Plus, most attorney's wouldn't bet the ranch on this decision since the Court is now swung in favor of overturning it.CollegeDoog said:
Seriously? Citation form superiority guy? I posted from my fone and couldn't remember which party brought the case to the court.PRedoubt said:
From a guy who attacks little girls with Festivus Poles? Consider yourself added to my list of grievances.CollegeDoog said:ACLU vs Allegheny County pretty much answers the religious displays at public buildings question.
Supreme Court case superiority guy.
BTW, your citation form is wrong. The case is County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, (1989). Holding that, "[a] creche display has that unconstitutional effect, but [we] reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment regarding the menorah display".
Considering that it was a 5-4 decision from 1989, with Kennedy writing for the dissent, I wouldn't push it. It would very likely be overturned if a similar case came up for certiorari.
That's some first rate faggotry.
BTW, these discussions are also, NOT the type of thing that the readers here are interested in. I think you should stop asking for legal opinions that you don't intend to pay for.
HTH. Merry Christmas. -
mods?PRedoubt said:
Just trying to be helpful. You also didn't use italics; you used vs. instead of v.; and you didn't cite the case number. Any Judge in America would crucify you for any of those. Plus, most attorney's wouldn't bet the ranch on this decision since the Court is now swung in favor of overturning it.CollegeDoog said:
Seriously? Citation form superiority guy? I posted from my fone and couldn't remember which party brought the case to the court.PRedoubt said:
From a guy who attacks little girls with Festivus Poles? Consider yourself added to my list of grievances.CollegeDoog said:ACLU vs Allegheny County pretty much answers the religious displays at public buildings question.
Supreme Court case superiority guy.
BTW, your citation form is wrong. The case is County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, (1989). Holding that, "[a] creche display has that unconstitutional effect, but [we] reverse the Court of Appeals' judgment regarding the menorah display".
Considering that it was a 5-4 decision from 1989, with Kennedy writing for the dissent, I wouldn't push it. It would very likely be overturned if a similar case came up for certiorari.
That's some first rate faggotry.
BTW, these discussions are also, NOT the type of thing that the readers here are interested in. I think you should stop asking for legal opinions that you don't intend to pay for.
HTH. Merry Christmas.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
