Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
It's always the coverup..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-lawyer-moved-transcript-of-trump-call-to-classified-server-after-ukraine-adviser-raised-alarms/2019/10/30/ba0fbdb6-fb4e-11e9-8190-6be4deb56e01_story.htmlMoments after President Trump ended his phone call with Ukraine’s president on July 25, an unsettled national security aide rushed to the office of White House lawyer John Eisenberg.
Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine adviser at the White House, had been listening to the call and was disturbed by the pressure Trump had applied to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals, according to people familiar with Vindman’s testimony to lawmakers this week.
Vindman told Eisenberg, the White House’s legal adviser on national security issues, that what the president did was wrong, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.
Scribbling notes on a yellow legal pad, Eisenberg proposed a step that other officials have said is at odds with long-standing White House protocol: moving a transcript of the call to a highly classified server and restricting access to it, according to two people familiar with Vindman’s account.
-2 ·
Comments
HondoFSBros are bright ones...
The truth is this is the same exact behavior and bullshit we saw for 2.5 years of the wrong side being investigated for Russian collusion and illegally wire tapping a competing Presidential campaign.
WAPO and NYT were full of anonymous quotes and all were supposedly factual and damaging to Trump. In the end it was all bullshit lies. It is what these liberal idiots do.
There's no reports that all transcripts are going into this classified server. You pulled that out of your ass just like the weather reports you claimed said the hurricane was hitting Alabama.
Rather easily.
but but we scored more times....
Loosers loose.
The insanity gets worse when the loser who won is abusing his office, and the losers of the election who won argue that he isn't abusing his office which he actually lost and claim that his loss is being overturned. Got it?