Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Hey Lou can we discuss the article you posted that you claimed "debunked" the PragerU video?

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Standard Supporter
First of all for a guy who's go to move is question the source of the other person information, as Throbber pointed out, I congratulate you on citation of Doktor Zoom, as your source.

If the "switch" in party affiliation came about because "people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed." When was that change? And how do you explain 75% of the black vote going to FDR in 1936? Was that on account of their perception that the Rats position on civil rights had changed?

Comments

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Kunt bump. What's the matter Lou? Did the good Doktor not have the talking points on this one?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    U

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.

    You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?
    It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.
    Really? And it had nothing to do with the fact that the Rat party pushed further to left on issues like abortion and support for the military and became more hostile toward religion and traditional values and softer on Communism? What exactly did a Southern Democrat have in common with the McGovern wing that took over the party in 1972?

    When did this "change" on civil rights come about?
    Last I checked black people tend to be very religious so no it had nothing to do with abortion or religion. Nice try though.
    Help me to understand the Kunt logic here. So because black people tend to be very religious, therefore the appeal that had compeled white voters to switch to the Republican party had to be on account of the parties stance on Civil Rights and can't have anything to do with the Rats's swing to the left on cultural issues like school prayer, pornography, recreational drugs and abortion. Had to be Civil Rights.


    How do you explain that in 1936 FDR got 75% of the black vote after getting less than a 1/3 in 1932? How did Eisenhower win 5 Southern States in 1956 if this "switch" came about due to the party's change on Civil Rights?

    When did this change on civil rights happen?

    I'll give you fair warning here and I think you already realize this. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about but I'll grant that you have very, very strong feelings that what you think you know is true, but if you continue with this I'm going to wipe the floor with your ignorant ass.

    Oh Bobby, your tuff guy talk gives me such a hard on. Please keep it up. In the 1932 election blacks stayed loyal to Hoover but by the time of the 1936 election came about there were some economic improvements for black, though not nearly as much as whites, and they attributed that to FDR. Also EVERYONE voted for FDR, it was the largest landslide in US history. The Democratic party on the national level stayed away from civil rights talk because FDR was afraid of upsetting his SOUTHERN allies. On the local level though there was a concerted outreach effort to attract the black voter especially in the north. Doors opened in the Democratic party in the North that weren't available in the South. For the first time blacks had political power via the Dem party. If you think blacks in the South didn't notice this you're a fool.

    Eisenhower was an outlier. A fucking war hero who appealed to Southern voters. Also one of the biggest political landslides ever. So what?
    Thanks for conceding that this was a pile of steaming horseshit Lou.

    It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.

    Blacks switched the party they supported for reasons that had nothing to do with their perceptions on where the parties stood on Civil Rights. Because in 1936 the Rat party was still the proud home of the Klan and Jim Crow. Hell the Congress couldn't even pass an anti-lynching law on account of Rat party opposition.

    Also EVERYONE voted for FDR, it was the largest landslide in US history.

    Again refuting your bullshit about civil rights having anything to do with a party switch.

    Eisenhower was an outlier. A fucking war hero who appealed to Southern voters. Also one of the biggest political landslides ever. So what?

    If proves you're full of shit that's what. If the parties stance on Civil Rights was the determinative issue on how black and white Southerns voted then why the fuck were white Southerners voting for Eisenhower in even greater number in 1956 than they did in 1952?

    Blacks have overwhelmingly voted for Rat Presidents since 1936 even when the Republican who was running had a better record on Civil Rights. So again, I thank you for admitting your were talking out your ass when you claimed:

    It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    U

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.

    You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?
    It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.
    Really? And it had nothing to do with the fact that the Rat party pushed further to left on issues like abortion and support for the military and became more hostile toward religion and traditional values and softer on Communism? What exactly did a Southern Democrat have in common with the McGovern wing that took over the party in 1972?

    When did this "change" on civil rights come about?
    Last I checked black people tend to be very religious so no it had nothing to do with abortion or religion. Nice try though.
    Lol. Them blacks are very religious. JFC. Could you be more racist? Nothing like lumping people into a racial stereotype. Any word on the kind of food “they” tend to enjoy?
    Yea, its so racist that those racist bastards at Pew actually do polling on the subject and found that blacks are more religious than whites in every measurable way.

    Blacks and religion
    https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/racial-and-ethnic-composition/black/

    Whites and religion
    https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/racial-and-ethnic-composition/white/

    So it appears that the RATS embrace if abortion, sex with other people, Communism, Moloch, porn, jerking off to porn, and jerking off to Moloch didn't impede their migration to the Democratic party. Gee, I wonder what caused them so SWITCH?
    So blacks are more religious. Your claim is that whites started voting more Republican in the South because of the "people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed."

    What does that have to do with blacks being more religious?
    Your assertion is that Whites in the South abandoned the Dem party because Dems supported abortion, Satan, were against school prayer etc but these factors didn't seem to impact Blacks switching to the Dem party. Why the difference?

    Not what I said Lou, why do you have to lie? I challenged your claim that the "switch" in party affiliation came because of the "people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed."

    I said the change in party affiliation had far more to do with the Rat's party's drift to the left on issues like abortion and softer on Communism and hostility toward the military and toward religion.


  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,980
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Cat blogger.

    That's Doktor Zoom to you pal.
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    This is sad.

    That you're such a lightweight Kunt. I agree.
  • Options
    TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
Sign In or Register to comment.