Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How do you alt-right assholes rationalize the quid pro quo?

2

Comments

  • SarkFanSixtyNine
    SarkFanSixtyNine Member Posts: 373
    so like help me understand this cuz my knowledge is basically i watched a susan rice interview and her explanation was YEA WE DID QUID PRO QUO BLATANTLY BUT OURS WAS GOOD


    so i think the story goes that you guys will be able to prove that trump:
    1. did a quid pro quo
    2. doesnt have any legitimate issue with obvious corruption
    3. preventing US politicians from committing obvious corruption is against the interests of americans

    and then ok lets say you do prove those impossible to prove things what actually is the charge here at this already ridiculous point?



    GOD DAMMIT I CANT BELIEVE HOW FS EVERYTHING IS HOW ARE PEOPLE STILL WATCHING THIS STUFF
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    ApostleofGrief said:

    Now that the evidence shows Mr Trump withheld foreign aid in a real war for sham Ukranian investigations that benefit him, how do you rationalize it?

    I am assuming you are going to argue Mr Trump was "fighting corruption"? You've had to give up now on hearsay and "no quid pro quo". Or, you are going to say everybody lied but Mr Trump? Let me hear it. I need a laugh.

    You just described exactly what Schmoe Biden did.

    You're a massive idiot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    Now that the evidence shows Mr Trump withheld foreign aid in a real war for sham Ukranian investigations that benefit him, how do you rationalize it?

    I am assuming you are going to argue Mr Trump was "fighting corruption"? You've had to give up now on hearsay and "no quid pro quo". Or, you are going to say everybody lied but Mr Trump? Let me hear it. I need a laugh.

    You just described exactly what Schmoe Biden did.

    You're a massive idiot.
    I guess we should impeach Biden then...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited October 2019
    ThomasFremont said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    Now that the evidence shows Mr Trump withheld foreign aid in a real war for sham Ukranian investigations that benefit him, how do you rationalize it?

    I am assuming you are going to argue Mr Trump was "fighting corruption"? You've had to give up now on hearsay and "no quid pro quo". Or, you are going to say everybody lied but Mr Trump? Let me hear it. I need a laugh.

    You just described exactly what Schmoe Biden did.

    You're a massive idiot.
    I guess we should impeach Biden then...
    Follow the cookie crumbs and it leads right back to Hussein Obama, the Great Almighty Philosopher King and Nobel Prize Winner.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    SarkFanSixtyNine said:

    STRINGS ATTACHED FOR AID
    OH GOD THE HUMANITY
    HOW COULD ANYONE STOOP TO SUCH A LEVEL
    WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT BLATANT CORRUPTION INVESTIGATED
    DEMOCRACY IS FUCKING DEAD IF A POLITICIAN EXPECTS SOMETHING IN RETURN FOR MONEY
    IMPLLPPLEEEAAACCCHHHHHHHH

    Ummmmm, it wasn’t Daddy’s money to bargain with.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Bendintheriver said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    Now that the evidence shows Mr Trump withheld foreign aid in a real war for sham Ukranian investigations that benefit him, how do you rationalize it?

    I am assuming you are going to argue Mr Trump was "fighting corruption"? You've had to give up now on hearsay and "no quid pro quo". Or, you are going to say everybody lied but Mr Trump? Let me hear it. I need a laugh.

    By all means give us the "evidence". Please be specific and give us the details.

    You can read the Ukrainian ambassadors opening statement. Why do you need others to tell you what to think? Seems to be a common trait with conservatards like yourself and Turd Burglar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    GDS said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    Now that the evidence shows Mr Trump withheld foreign aid in a real war for sham Ukranian investigations that benefit him, how do you rationalize it?

    I am assuming you are going to argue Mr Trump was "fighting corruption"? You've had to give up now on hearsay and "no quid pro quo". Or, you are going to say everybody lied but Mr Trump? Let me hear it. I need a laugh.

    By all means give us the "evidence". Please be specific and give us the details.

    You can read the Ukrainian ambassadors opening statement. Why do you need others to tell you what to think? Seems to be a common trait with conservatards like yourself and Turd Burglar.
    You have to keep in mind, always, that Trumptards don't actually live in the same real world the rest of us do. They accept and embrace a wholesale falsification of it. If Mr Trump says he is fighting corruption and had a perfect conversation, a Trumptard believes it without question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter
    AOG thinks anyone more moderate than AOC is "alt-right".

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,527 Founders Club
    I haven't seen any evidence. Are the hearings televised?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,593 Standard Supporter
    I'm "hearing" they don't have enough votes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter