Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The stats are out on Peterman. Enter at your own peril

I spent a tuff 5 minutes of brainpower (a lot for me) compiling these statistic on the Peterlips regime. It aint pretty.

Petersen is 2-4 against Oregon
Petersen is 2-4 against Stanford
Petersen is 2-3 against ASU
Petersen is 3-3 against Cal
Petersen is 0-2 against SEC teams
Petersen is 0-2 against good B1G teams
Petersen is 1-4 in Bowl Games

Yikes.

Fucking yikes. This needs to lead to a breakthrough or this is the biggest blueballing in D1 football history. Reminiscent of the early 90s Bills...did they lose 3 or 4 Super Bowls in a row, I forget?

Some stats in Pete's favor:

Like 12-1 against the WAC schools Uoot and buff.
5-0 versus the poor mans aTm of the west...cuog
#4 finish in 2016


In closing,






beat FUCKING OREGON PETE HOLY SHIT
Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,433 Founders Club

    I spent a tuff 5 minutes of brainpower (a lot for me) compiling these statistic on the Peterlips regime. It aint pretty.

    Petersen is 2-4 against Oregon
    Petersen is 2-4 against Stanford
    Petersen is 2-3 against ASU
    Petersen is 3-3 against Cal
    Petersen is 0-2 against SEC teams
    Petersen is 0-2 against good B1G teams
    Petersen is 1-4 in Bowl Games

    Yikes.

    Fucking yikes. This needs to lead to a breakthrough or this is the biggest blueballing in D1 football history. Reminiscent of the early 90s Bills...did they lose 3 or 4 Super Bowls in a row, I forget?

    Some stats in Pete's favor:

    Like 12-1 against the WAC schools Uoot and buff.
    5-0 versus the poor mans aTm of the west...cuog
    #4 finish in 2016


    In closing,






    beat FUCKING OREGON PETE HOLY SHIT

    Seems like we’re Kansas State-of the early 2000’s
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,680
    HuskyJW said:

    I spent a tuff 5 minutes of brainpower (a lot for me) compiling these statistic on the Peterlips regime. It aint pretty.

    Petersen is 2-4 against Oregon
    Petersen is 2-4 against Stanford
    Petersen is 2-3 against ASU
    Petersen is 3-3 against Cal
    Petersen is 0-2 against SEC teams
    Petersen is 0-2 against good B1G teams
    Petersen is 1-4 in Bowl Games

    Yikes.

    Fucking yikes. This needs to lead to a breakthrough or this is the biggest blueballing in D1 football history. Reminiscent of the early 90s Bills...did they lose 3 or 4 Super Bowls in a row, I forget?

    Some stats in Pete's favor:

    Like 12-1 against the WAC schools Uoot and buff.
    5-0 versus the poor mans aTm of the west...cuog
    #4 finish in 2016


    In closing,






    beat FUCKING OREGON PETE HOLY SHIT

    Seems like we’re Kansas State-of the early 2000’s
    Not familiar with that other than Bill Snyder had them decent. Did they also lose every big OOC game?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014

    Petersen never had to coach close games at Boise, so he never learned how to make halftime adjustments or manage a game.

    We've seen this pattern for the last 3 years and it's getting worse and worse since he peaked in 2016.

    Eh idk about this. He beat Oklahoma in the mother of all close games and beat a tuff undefeated TCU in 2010 or 2011. He won big games at Boise all the time. He won the equivalent of 2018 UW-Auburn when he beat Georgia in Atlanta. He also beat Va Tech in DC.

    Something just isnt working. At all.
    Maybe it's because we replaced our assistants with gameday coaching experience with new assistants who are better at recruiting?
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,680

    Petersen never had to coach close games at Boise, so he never learned how to make halftime adjustments or manage a game.

    We've seen this pattern for the last 3 years and it's getting worse and worse since he peaked in 2016.

    Eh idk about this. He beat Oklahoma in the mother of all close games and beat a tuff undefeated TCU in 2010 or 2011. He won big games at Boise all the time. He won the equivalent of 2018 UW-Auburn when he beat Georgia in Atlanta. He also beat Va Tech in DC.

    Something just isnt working. At all.
    Maybe it's because we replaced our assistants with gameday coaching experience with new assistants who are better at recruiting?
    Maybe. But still...sarks players in 2016 were impactful

    Pete never gets azeem or Ross
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,620 Standard Supporter
    HuskyJW said:

    I spent a tuff 5 minutes of brainpower (a lot for me) compiling these statistic on the Peterlips regime. It aint pretty.

    Petersen is 2-4 against Oregon
    Petersen is 2-4 against Stanford
    Petersen is 2-3 against ASU
    Petersen is 3-3 against Cal
    Petersen is 0-2 against SEC teams
    Petersen is 0-2 against good B1G teams
    Petersen is 1-4 in Bowl Games

    Yikes.

    Fucking yikes. This needs to lead to a breakthrough or this is the biggest blueballing in D1 football history. Reminiscent of the early 90s Bills...did they lose 3 or 4 Super Bowls in a row, I forget?

    Some stats in Pete's favor:

    Like 12-1 against the WAC schools Uoot and buff.
    5-0 versus the poor mans aTm of the west...cuog
    #4 finish in 2016


    In closing,






    beat FUCKING OREGON PETE HOLY SHIT

    Seems like we’re Kansas State-of the early 2000’s
    But, like, with SHITLOADS more talent.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Petersen never had to coach close games at Boise, so he never learned how to make halftime adjustments or manage a game.

    We've seen this pattern for the last 3 years and it's getting worse and worse since he peaked in 2016.

    Eh idk about this. He beat Oklahoma in the mother of all close games and beat a tuff undefeated TCU in 2010 or 2011. He won big games at Boise all the time. He won the equivalent of 2018 UW-Auburn when he beat Georgia in Atlanta. He also beat Va Tech in DC.

    Something just isnt working. At all.
    Maybe it's because we replaced our assistants with gameday coaching experience with new assistants who are better at recruiting?
    Which ones were those?