Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey HondoBros

2»

Comments

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    https://mises.org/library/good-ol-days-when-tax-rates-were-90-percent

    “A study from the Congressional Research Service concludes that the effective tax rate for the top 0.01 percent of income earners during the period of 91-percent income taxes was actually 45 percent. Given that the top bracket is so much lower today ($3,425,766 in 1955 vs. $413,200 in 2015), the 39.6 percent top marginal rate probably yields something pretty close.”

    Bottom line, effective tax rates haven’t changed much in 60 years. Sorry that hurts your vag.

    you love comparing apples to dogshit don't you. From your own fucking link

    The average tax rate for the top 0.01% (one taxpayer in 10,000) was about 60% in 1945 and fell to 24.2% by 1990.

    Again even the top 0.01% is a much larger group than the top 400 income earners.
    Who was taking about 1945? Hondo level goal post move. Good job. Apples to dogshit
    Your source material was. You seriously can not be this fucking stupid....
    You said 1950 dumb ass. And 70%. Not 1945, which was tail end of ww2 and 70%.

    So sure, let’s discuss something that was never asserted.
    It’s not fucking possible you are this stupid...it shows data consistent with the assertion about 1950. Good grief...
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    https://mises.org/library/good-ol-days-when-tax-rates-were-90-percent

    “A study from the Congressional Research Service concludes that the effective tax rate for the top 0.01 percent of income earners during the period of 91-percent income taxes was actually 45 percent. Given that the top bracket is so much lower today ($3,425,766 in 1955 vs. $413,200 in 2015), the 39.6 percent top marginal rate probably yields something pretty close.”

    Bottom line, effective tax rates haven’t changed much in 60 years. Sorry that hurts your vag.

    you love comparing apples to dogshit don't you. From your own fucking link

    The average tax rate for the top 0.01% (one taxpayer in 10,000) was about 60% in 1945 and fell to 24.2% by 1990.

    Again even the top 0.01% is a much larger group than the top 400 income earners.
    Who was taking about 1945? Hondo level goal post move. Good job. Apples to dogshit
    Your source material was. You seriously can not be this fucking stupid....
    You said 1950 dumb ass. And 70%. Not 1945, which was tail end of ww2 and 70%.

    So sure, let’s discuss something that was never asserted.
    It’s not fucking possible you are this stupid...it shows data consistent with the assertion about 1950. Good grief...
    Keep ignoring this you dishonest fuck.

    The effective tax rate for the top 0.01 percent of income earners during the period of 91-percent income taxes was actually 45 percent. Given that the top bracket is so much lower today ($3,425,766 in 1955 vs. $413,200 in 2015), the 39.6 percent top marginal rate probably yields something pretty close.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    https://mises.org/library/good-ol-days-when-tax-rates-were-90-percent

    “A study from the Congressional Research Service concludes that the effective tax rate for the top 0.01 percent of income earners during the period of 91-percent income taxes was actually 45 percent. Given that the top bracket is so much lower today ($3,425,766 in 1955 vs. $413,200 in 2015), the 39.6 percent top marginal rate probably yields something pretty close.”

    Bottom line, effective tax rates haven’t changed much in 60 years. Sorry that hurts your vag.

    you love comparing apples to dogshit don't you. From your own fucking link

    The average tax rate for the top 0.01% (one taxpayer in 10,000) was about 60% in 1945 and fell to 24.2% by 1990.

    Again even the top 0.01% is a much larger group than the top 400 income earners.
    Who was taking about 1945? Hondo level goal post move. Good job. Apples to dogshit
    Your source material was. You seriously can not be this fucking stupid....
    You said 1950 dumb ass. And 70%. Not 1945, which was tail end of ww2 and 70%.

    So sure, let’s discuss something that was never asserted.
    It’s not fucking possible you are this stupid...it shows data consistent with the assertion about 1950. Good grief...
    Keep ignoring this you dishonest fuck.

    The effective tax rate for the top 0.01 percent of income earners during the period of 91-percent income taxes was actually 45 percent. Given that the top bracket is so much lower today ($3,425,766 in 1955 vs. $413,200 in 2015), the 39.6 percent top marginal rate probably yields something pretty close.”
    Haha so by Mike dumbass logic my reply should be no one was talking about 0.01% group in 1955!!! We were discussing top 400 in 1950!