Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

National Media Has Chimed In On Petersen

DoogCouricsDoogCourics Member Posts: 5,739
edited October 2019 in Hardcore Husky Board
Dan Wolken of USA Today:


Washington - Once a coach earns elite status from the college football cognoscenti, it’s like getting tenure as a professor – you pretty much have it forever. But Chris Petersen is living off a reputation he no longer deserves, and the only title Washington is going to win any time soon is as the nation’s most disappointing program. Since making the College Football Playoff in 2016, Washington has lost games each of the last three years as a double-digit favorite. The common denominator in those games? A sputtering offense, which no longer resembles the creative and freewheeling system that Petersen rode to prominence at Boise State. Washington’s 23-13 loss Saturday to a very mediocre Stanford team featured a meager 294 yards of offense, while quarterback Jacob Eason completed just 16-of-36 passes. It was a similar story earlier in the season against Cal in a 20-19 loss, but this trend extends back to the Jake Browning era where the Huskies’ lack of offensive explosiveness made them vulnerable to big upsets. Moreover, this is the second year in a row where Washington entered the season as a popular pick to make the playoff and yet suffered its second loss by mid-October. It doesn’t mean Washington is a bad program or that Petersen isn’t doing a good job overall, but we all need to start talking about the Huskies realistically rather than banking on some notion of coaching genius that isn’t showing up in the results.





Dan isn’t wrong.

Comments

  • Kingdome_UrinalsKingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,723
    Dan is a truth teller. He is a freedom fighter.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,564 Swaye's Wigwam
    What kind of word is cognoscenti lmao
  • BreadBread Member Posts: 4,013
    Still better then chip kelly?
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    haie said:

    Coaches thought Eason, Fuller, Bachellia, and Bryant were going to shred Stanford's secondary.

    2 for fucking 13 on third down.

    Those are shit tier program stats.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,586 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2019

    haie said:

    Coaches thought Eason, Fuller, Bachellia, and Bryant were going to shred Stanford's secondary.

    2 for fucking 13 on third down.

    Those are shit tier program stats.
    I'm not sure you realize it, but you're the dumbest piece of shit on this board.

    Mikey and Creep can talk all they want, but you're the fucking retard still clamoring about raiding area 51 and how Phil Knight should just buy you and your Springfield buddies a tank brigade for such an event.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,586 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2019

    haie said:

    Coaches thought Eason, Fuller, Bachellia, and Bryant were going to shred Stanford's secondary.

    2 for fucking 13 on third down.

    We probably would've won if we ran the ball 90% of the plays.

    Our coaches are so fucking stupid.

    Common link between Sark and Pete is an obsession with the passing game despite it sucking. Fucking former QBs man...
    This entire fucking board wants Skinny to let it rip X/X plays a game.

    When this team has only ever been worth a shit when there's a slight threat of a Pettis/Ross/Eason and we're just pounding them with Gaskin/Newton/Coleman. Fuck it add McGrew.
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,163

    Seems like Pete is in good company with that asshat in Michigan.

    Chip, Jim, and Pete. Two years ago we'd all say they were a sure thing and top five coaches in the game. I'd still take our guy over the other two, but it's incredible how much damage they've all done to their reputation in such a short amount of time. I don't have any clever takeaway here, it just fucking sucks to get a taste of the good stuff and then inexplicably fall off such a seemingly upward trajectory.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Seems like Pete is in good company with that asshat in Michigan.

    Chip, Jim, and Pete. Two years ago we'd all say they were a sure thing and top five coaches in the game. I'd still take our guy over the other two, but it's incredible how much damage they've all done to their reputation in such a short amount of time. I don't have any clever takeaway here, it just fucking sucks to get a taste of the good stuff and then inexplicably fall off such a seemingly upward trajectory.
    Welcome to big time college football.

    Schmoe.
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,163

    Seems like Pete is in good company with that asshat in Michigan.

    Chip, Jim, and Pete. Two years ago we'd all say they were a sure thing and top five coaches in the game. I'd still take our guy over the other two, but it's incredible how much damage they've all done to their reputation in such a short amount of time. I don't have any clever takeaway here, it just fucking sucks to get a taste of the good stuff and then inexplicably fall off such a seemingly upward trajectory.
    Welcome to big time college football.

    Schmoe.
    More unhinged political rants, less of whatever fucktarded shtick this is that you've decided to adopt this season.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,893 Standard Supporter

    Dan Wolken of USA Today:

    Washington - Once a coach earns elite status from the college football cognoscenti, it’s like getting tenure as a professor – you pretty much have it forever. But Chris Petersen is living off a reputation he no longer deserves, and the only title Washington is going to win any time soon is as the nation’s most disappointing program. Since making the College Football Playoff in 2016, Washington has lost games each of the last three years as a double-digit favorite. The common denominator in those games? A sputtering offense, which no longer resembles the creative and freewheeling system that Petersen rode to prominence at Boise State. Washington’s 23-13 loss Saturday to a very mediocre Stanford team featured a meager 294 yards of offense, while quarterback Jacob Eason completed just 16-of-36 passes. It was a similar story earlier in the season against Cal in a 20-19 loss, but this trend extends back to the Jake Browning era where the Huskies’ lack of offensive explosiveness made them vulnerable to big upsets. Moreover, this is the second year in a row where Washington entered the season as a popular pick to make the playoff and yet suffered its second loss by mid-October. It doesn’t mean Washington is a bad program or that Petersen isn’t doing a good job overall, but we all need to start talking about the Huskies realistically rather than banking on some notion of coaching genius that isn’t showing up in the results.

    Dan isn’t wrong.



    Dan's plagiarisming my shit, fuckos.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,531 Founders Club

    haie said:

    Coaches thought Eason, Fuller, Bachellia, and Bryant were going to shred Stanford's secondary.

    2 for fucking 13 on third down.

    Those are shit tier program stats.
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.