So why did the IG change the interpretation of the law?

SFGbob

Appears the person who was comfortable allowing unelected bureaucrats to change the law at their own discretion was you O'Keefed.

How long was the first hand knowledge standard in effect? Was that the standard under Obama? Why did it just change now?

HHusky

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

SFGbob

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

GDS

It wasn't.

Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute. In fact, by law the Complainant – or any individual in the Intelligence Community who wants to report information with respect to an urgent concern to the congressional intelligence committees – need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern. The ICIG cannot add conditions to the filing of an urgent concern that do not exist in law.

If this doesn't clear it up for you then read Grassley's statement this morning. You seem to be really confused about all this. Maybe stop buying into all the right wing fake news pushed by guys like Houston and Deej.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law by the IG. I don't know that that's the case, but you can feel free to look into it.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law the IG. I don't know that, but you can feel free to look into it.

Unlike you O'Keefed, I care about the truth and I care about the facts. That's why when I'm wrong I can easily admit it. And it's why you'll maintain a lie for 6 years rather than admit that you were wrong.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law the IG. I don't know that, but you can feel free to look into it.

Unlike you O'Keefed, I care about the truth and I care about the facts. That's why when I'm wrong I can easily admit it. And it's why you'll maintain a lie for 6 years rather than admit that you were wrong.

But surely you should be trying to research this fascinating issue rather than spending your time providing me all these nuggets of wisdom.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law the IG. I don't know that, but you can feel free to look into it.

Unlike you O'Keefed, I care about the truth and I care about the facts. That's why when I'm wrong I can easily admit it. And it's why you'll maintain a lie for 6 years rather than admit that you were wrong.

But surely you should be trying to research this fascinating issue rather than spending your time providing me all these nuggets of wisdom.

There's no point in ever trying to provide you with wisdom O'Keefed, you're a liar and partisan hack and when the facts don't align with you politics you'll either ignore them or lie and claim they aren't true.

It's just another manifestation of your inability to ever admit when you've been wrong. It's why you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt when you first earned your name O'Keefed. Remember when you earned your nickname?

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law the IG. I don't know that, but you can feel free to look into it.

Unlike you O'Keefed, I care about the truth and I care about the facts. That's why when I'm wrong I can easily admit it. And it's why you'll maintain a lie for 6 years rather than admit that you were wrong.

But surely you should be trying to research this fascinating issue rather than spending your time providing me all these nuggets of wisdom.

There's no point in ever trying to provide you with wisdom O'Keefed, you're a liar and partisan hack and when the facts don't align with you politics you'll either ignore them or lie and claim they aren't true.

It's just another manifestation of your inability to ever admit when you've been wrong. It's why you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt when you first earned your name O'Keefed. Remember when you earned your nickname?

I find me interesting too. But the issue was an IG interpretation. Please get on that!

Sledog

HH sure sounds like CD!

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I guess I wasn't as familiar with the whistleblower form before now as you were, blob. I'm outraged that it was wrong previously. Sounds like Obama must have been covering up something. Please get to the bottom of that, won't you?

I didn't even know there was a whistle blower form. Go fuck yourself. But it's obvious that the old forms had a higher standard than the law required. Not being a complete fucking hack like you with no interest in the truth or facts, I'd like to know when the interpretation of the law changed.

You have no interest in the truth or facts so if you have to lie, make shit up, or bury and ignore inconvenient information you will do so.

Seems as if you're pretty fixated on this collateral matter. But you begin by assuming that the form reflected any actual interpretation of the law the IG. I don't know that, but you can feel free to look into it.

Unlike you O'Keefed, I care about the truth and I care about the facts. That's why when I'm wrong I can easily admit it. And it's why you'll maintain a lie for 6 years rather than admit that you were wrong.

But surely you should be trying to research this fascinating issue rather than spending your time providing me all these nuggets of wisdom.

There's no point in ever trying to provide you with wisdom O'Keefed, you're a liar and partisan hack and when the facts don't align with you politics you'll either ignore them or lie and claim they aren't true.

It's just another manifestation of your inability to ever admit when you've been wrong. It's why you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt when you first earned your name O'Keefed. Remember when you earned your nickname?

I find me interesting too. But the issue was an IG interpretation. Please get on that!

I don't find you all that interesting. Run of the mill dishonest leftist who's ego is so fragile they can never admit when they are wrong. I've only seen about a dozen of those over the years. You, City, Hondo, Snotty, you're all the same.