Scary stuff
Comments
-
If you think police unions have any power you're nuts. No power. None. Can't strike it's illegal. How's that for workers rights? Paramilitary organization I have been ordered and ordered people into work regularly. You don't get to say no. Large thick book of rules.2001400ex said:
No it's the hypocrisy. You rolled a union job living off the government and now hate unions and the government.Sledog said:
Paid for by me and the city that employed me. Does no one else have a pension plan at work here? Used to be quite common until the socialists started crying they weren't getting one for NOT working or paying into a pension plan.2001400ex said:
Paid by the California state government. I heard those pension plans were bankrupt. About ready to go under.Sledog said:
It is a city government. I'm receiving what they agreed to in a contract. Maybe you can find an attorney to explain that complex legal stuff to you. Know any?CirrhosisDawg said:
Your employer is the government. Your pension no where nears what you paid. You are a fucking leech on taxpayers.Sledog said:
I receive a pension that was paid into for 30 years by me and my employer. Common thing really. maybe you could look up an example. You're shmart!CirrhosisDawg said:
You receive a taxpayer subsidized pension.Sledog said:
Fixed that for ya.ThomasFremont said:Weird how he lost most of the places where lots of people
liveget free shit!.
Hard to believe I know.
This fucking generation of envy is ridiculous. Get to work you lazy fucks!!
Paid into my pension.
Ask the burgermeister to start a pension plan.
-
No shite they aren't in bankruptcy protection.CirrhosisDawg said:
Stockton is not in bankruptcy protection.HoustonHusky said:WooHooo...you underwrote them before and after bankruptcy. You should be proud.
Before Detroit Stockton was the largest US city to ever go bankrupt...something you should be proud of underwriting...
Let’s add municipal bankruptcy, hurricanes and whistleblower complaints to the long list of things about which you are demonstrably clueless.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-stockton-bankruptcy/stockton-california-files-for-bankruptcy-idUSBRE85S05120120629
Couldn’t pay their bondholders...hum. Wonder who was bragging about those... -
BumpHoustonHusky said:
And people wonder why a bunch of the cities of Cali are bankrupt...they have CirrhosisoftheBrain as their “banker”.CirrhosisDawg said:
I underwrite millions of dollars for California cities in the bond market every year. For 25 years. Everyone knows you are living a lie. Scamming taxpayers. Robbing the public. Wall Street knows this. The public officials your union bribed knows this. Why do you continue with the lie? You couldn’t possibly appear more idiotic if you tried so this could be a cathartic experience for you.Sledog said:
It is a city government. I'm receiving what they agreed to in a contract. Maybe you can find an attorney to explain that complex legal stuff to you. Know any?CirrhosisDawg said:
Your employer is the government. Your pension no where nears what you paid. You are a fucking leech on taxpayers.Sledog said:
I receive a pension that was paid into for 30 years by me and my employer. Common thing really. maybe you could look up an example. You're shmart!CirrhosisDawg said:
You receive a taxpayer subsidized pension.Sledog said:
Fixed that for ya.ThomasFremont said:Weird how he lost most of the places where lots of people
liveget free shit!.
HoustonHuskyFS
-
CirrhosisOfTheBrain.
Bankrupt. Not in bankruptcy. I.e. their promised expenditures (daily operations plus promised benefits) exceeds their assets/revenue.
And the former governor of Cali and lots of others agree...
https://reason.com/2018/06/01/california-gov-jerry-brown-a-lot-of-citi/
His rationale for refusing to bail out hard-pressed local governments is compelling, concise and worthy of applause: "A lot of cities signed up for pensions they can't afford."
Why should taxpayers throughout the state pay more in taxes—or tolerate fewer services or more debt—to help those city governments that were fiscally irresponsible? They knew the risks, ignored the warnings and retroactively boosted pensions by as much as 50 percent over the past 15 years, yet now city officials are complaining about their tough fiscal position.
-
Oooohhh bankrupt. Not bankruptcy. Totally different.HoustonHusky said:CirrhosisOfTheBrain.
Bankrupt. Not in bankruptcy. I.e. their promised expenditures (daily operations plus promised benefits) exceeds their assets/revenue.
And the former governor of Cali and lots of others agree...
https://reason.com/2018/06/01/california-gov-jerry-brown-a-lot-of-citi/
His rationale for refusing to bail out hard-pressed local governments is compelling, concise and worthy of applause: "A lot of cities signed up for pensions they can't afford."
Why should taxpayers throughout the state pay more in taxes—or tolerate fewer services or more debt—to help those city governments that were fiscally irresponsible? They knew the risks, ignored the warnings and retroactively boosted pensions by as much as 50 percent over the past 15 years, yet now city officials are complaining about their tough fiscal position.
JFC
-
I'd love to watch Sledog snap your pencil neck, Nancy.HHusky said:
I’m glad there are entitlements for folks like Mall Cop.Sledog said:
It is a city government. I'm receiving what they agreed to in a contract. Maybe you can find an attorney to explain that complex legal stuff to you. Know any?CirrhosisDawg said:
Your employer is the government. Your pension no where nears what you paid. You are a fucking leech on taxpayers.Sledog said:
I receive a pension that was paid into for 30 years by me and my employer. Common thing really. maybe you could look up an example. You're shmart!CirrhosisDawg said:
You receive a taxpayer subsidized pension.Sledog said:
Fixed that for ya.ThomasFremont said:Weird how he lost most of the places where lots of people
liveget free shit!. -
A job you wouldn't have the balls to do in a million years, burger flipper. Keep talking smack, fast-food boy.2001400ex said:
No it's the hypocrisy. You rolled a union job living off the government and now hate unions and the government.Sledog said:
Paid for by me and the city that employed me. Does no one else have a pension plan at work here? Used to be quite common until the socialists started crying they weren't getting one for NOT working or paying into a pension plan.2001400ex said:
Paid by the California state government. I heard those pension plans were bankrupt. About ready to go under.Sledog said:
It is a city government. I'm receiving what they agreed to in a contract. Maybe you can find an attorney to explain that complex legal stuff to you. Know any?CirrhosisDawg said:
Your employer is the government. Your pension no where nears what you paid. You are a fucking leech on taxpayers.Sledog said:
I receive a pension that was paid into for 30 years by me and my employer. Common thing really. maybe you could look up an example. You're shmart!CirrhosisDawg said:
You receive a taxpayer subsidized pension.Sledog said:
Fixed that for ya.ThomasFremont said:Weird how he lost most of the places where lots of people
liveget free shit!.
Hard to believe I know.
This fucking generation of envy is ridiculous. Get to work you lazy fucks!! -
Hondo are you a hypocrite because you want higher taxes but don't actually pay the higher taxes you're advocating for? Did you let the government keep the money you got from the Trump tax cuts?2001400ex said:
No it's the hypocrisy. You rolled a union job living off the government and now hate unions and the government.Sledog said:
Paid for by me and the city that employed me. Does no one else have a pension plan at work here? Used to be quite common until the socialists started crying they weren't getting one for NOT working or paying into a pension plan.2001400ex said:
Paid by the California state government. I heard those pension plans were bankrupt. About ready to go under.Sledog said:
It is a city government. I'm receiving what they agreed to in a contract. Maybe you can find an attorney to explain that complex legal stuff to you. Know any?CirrhosisDawg said:
Your employer is the government. Your pension no where nears what you paid. You are a fucking leech on taxpayers.Sledog said:
I receive a pension that was paid into for 30 years by me and my employer. Common thing really. maybe you could look up an example. You're shmart!CirrhosisDawg said:
You receive a taxpayer subsidized pension.Sledog said:
Fixed that for ya.ThomasFremont said:Weird how he lost most of the places where lots of people
liveget free shit!.
Hard to believe I know.
This fucking generation of envy is ridiculous. Get to work you lazy fucks!! -
Yes, totally different, legally and procedurally. I wouldn't expect an ATM Tech to know that, though.CirrhosisDawg said:
Oooohhh bankrupt. Not bankruptcy. Totally different.HoustonHusky said:CirrhosisOfTheBrain.
Bankrupt. Not in bankruptcy. I.e. their promised expenditures (daily operations plus promised benefits) exceeds their assets/revenue.
And the former governor of Cali and lots of others agree...
https://reason.com/2018/06/01/california-gov-jerry-brown-a-lot-of-citi/
His rationale for refusing to bail out hard-pressed local governments is compelling, concise and worthy of applause: "A lot of cities signed up for pensions they can't afford."
Why should taxpayers throughout the state pay more in taxes—or tolerate fewer services or more debt—to help those city governments that were fiscally irresponsible? They knew the risks, ignored the warnings and retroactively boosted pensions by as much as 50 percent over the past 15 years, yet now city officials are complaining about their tough fiscal position.
JFC -
Expand on that if you could please. The legal and procedural differences between “bankrupt” and “bankruptcy.”TurdBomber said:
Yes, totally different, legally and procedurally. I wouldn't expect an ATM Tech to know that, though.CirrhosisDawg said:
Oooohhh bankrupt. Not bankruptcy. Totally different.HoustonHusky said:CirrhosisOfTheBrain.
Bankrupt. Not in bankruptcy. I.e. their promised expenditures (daily operations plus promised benefits) exceeds their assets/revenue.
And the former governor of Cali and lots of others agree...
https://reason.com/2018/06/01/california-gov-jerry-brown-a-lot-of-citi/
His rationale for refusing to bail out hard-pressed local governments is compelling, concise and worthy of applause: "A lot of cities signed up for pensions they can't afford."
Why should taxpayers throughout the state pay more in taxes—or tolerate fewer services or more debt—to help those city governments that were fiscally irresponsible? They knew the risks, ignored the warnings and retroactively boosted pensions by as much as 50 percent over the past 15 years, yet now city officials are complaining about their tough fiscal position.
JFC
