“This whistleblower needs to go to prison. He doesn’t need to be feted, he needs to go to prison,” he said.
The former U.S. attorney didn’t explain exactly why the anonymous informant should be jailed, though it may well have something to do with what Fred Fleitz, the former National Security Council chief of staff and CIA analyst, suggested: that “rules restricting access and knowledge of these sensitive calls [were] breached.”
Not to mention that the department of state of the federal government is a donor as well to OCCRP.
“This whistleblower needs to go to prison. He doesn’t need to be feted, he needs to go to prison,” he said.
The former U.S. attorney didn’t explain exactly why the anonymous informant should be jailed, though it may well have something to do with what Fred Fleitz, the former National Security Council chief of staff and CIA analyst, suggested: that “rules restricting access and knowledge of these sensitive calls [were] breached.”
Not to mention that the department of state of the federal government is a donor as well to OCCRP.
Thanks for connecting the dots on Deep-state operations.
“This whistleblower needs to go to prison. He doesn’t need to be feted, he needs to go to prison,” he said.
The former U.S. attorney didn’t explain exactly why the anonymous informant should be jailed, though it may well have something to do with what Fred Fleitz, the former National Security Council chief of staff and CIA analyst, suggested: that “rules restricting access and knowledge of these sensitive calls [were] breached.”
Not to mention that the department of state of the federal government is a donor as well to OCCRP.
Thanks for connecting the dots on Deep-state operations.
Comments
“This whistleblower needs to go to prison. He doesn’t need to be feted, he needs to go to prison,” he said.
The former U.S. attorney didn’t explain exactly why the anonymous informant should be jailed, though it may well have something to do with what Fred Fleitz, the former National Security Council chief of staff and CIA analyst, suggested: that “rules restricting access and knowledge of these sensitive calls [were] breached.”
Not to mention that the department of state of the federal government is a donor as well to OCCRP.
@NSA_Dawg