Fire Up the Impeachment Proceedings...
Comments
-
Low skills!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
White trash!!!’
Trumpanzees!!!
Tune in tomorrow for another episode of TDS, The El Monte files. -
Fuck. You’re better than that even with the typhus.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
Go forth. Pontificate. Otherwise you’re throwing BP afraid to face game time conditions.
Frankly, I don’t think you know shit. Just a typical TDS sufferer. -
El Monte is trying to break Hondo's one day Fuck Off total!
-
Now that's funny.salemcoog said:
Low skills!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
White trash!!!’
Trumpanzees!!!
Tune in tomorrow for another episode of TDS, The El Monte files. -
Identify what “high crimes and misdemeanors” means. Can you do that?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck. You’re better than that even with the typhus.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
Go forth. Pontificate. Otherwise you’re throwing BP afraid to face game time conditions.
Frankly, I don’t think you know shit. Just a typical TDS sufferer. -
El Monte is now throwing any shit he can come up with against the wall hoping something sticks in a desperate attempt to have people forget that he is dodging like a Kunt the initial question he was asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there. -
Go forth. Build the case.CirrhosisDawg said:
Identify what “high crimes and misdemeanors” means. Can you do that?PurpleThrobber said:
Fuck. You’re better than that even with the typhus.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
Go forth. Pontificate. Otherwise you’re throwing BP afraid to face game time conditions.
Frankly, I don’t think you know shit. Just a typical TDS sufferer. -
You sound assured impeachment should be off the table but you have no clue what it means, what it implies or how it is rendered.SFGbob said:
El Monte is now throwing any shit he can come up with against the wall hoping something sticks in a desperate attempt to have people forget that he is dodging like a Kunt the initial question he was asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there. -
Educate them. Or just keep running the belly option to the fullback. Same old shit.CirrhosisDawg said:
You sound assured impeachment should be off the table but you have no clue what it means, what it implies or how it is rendered.SFGbob said:
El Monte is now throwing any shit he can come up with against the wall hoping something sticks in a desperate attempt to have people forget that he is dodging like a Kunt the initial question he was asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there. -
There is no "table" El Monte!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You sound assured impeachment should be off the table but you have no clue what it means, what it implies or how it is rendered.SFGbob said:
El Monte is now throwing any shit he can come up with against the wall hoping something sticks in a desperate attempt to have people forget that he is dodging like a Kunt the initial question he was asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
You should provide Congress your legal guidance on impeachment standards. Sanctuary state laws too while you’re at it.SFGbob said:
Seriously, this is as bad as any Hondo level bullshit I've seen here. Why even bother? And it comes on the heels of his "it's not a transcript" Kunt act.CirrhosisDawg said:
“An opinion on legal grounds for impeachment?”PurpleThrobber said:I’ll rephrase for typhus boy.
Give us your opinion on the legal grounds for impeachment based on the words written on a piece of paper detailing the conversation between Trump and the president of the Ukraine.
Most normal English speaking people would call that a transcript but you don’t seem to want to answer that question.
Or are we going to play the ‘depends on what your definition of the word is is’ game?
You don’t know what impeachment means nor what a transcript is. Start there.
