maybe, just maybe, Pete is a lot smarter than we give him credit for. . . . . .

EwaDawg

Haener, gone.

Skinny the starter. Two adequate back ups that can get some reps during UH and EWU games.

Extra scholly if he needs it.

All of this accomplished before game week.


Win.Win.Win.Win

Don't really feel a down side.

PurpleJ

Used the “position battle” expertly to motivate Eason.

PurpleThrobber

Just bummed we won't see any Julie Haener/@swaye hookup tales around Homecoming time.....

Ok, maybe there's still a shot at that, knowing @swaye's tendencies.

EwaDawg

PurpleJ said:

Used the “position battle” expertly to motivate Eason.

Okay.

Win.Win.Win.Win.Win


Still not seeing a down side.

godawgst

Had he announced Skinny as the starter in the spring (thereby not missing all the valuable reps both then and in fall camp) like Alpha Coaches and Programs do, Haener would have left, but Yankoff would still be here.

PurpleJ

EwaDawg said:

PurpleJ said:

Used the “position battle” expertly to motivate Eason.

Okay.

Win.Win.Win.Win.Win


Still not seeing a down side.

I was agreeing with you. Classic asshole winner coach move. I think Pete intended all along to play Eason. Just wanted him to sweat a little and EARN it.

whatshouldicareabout

godawgst said:

Had he announced Skinny as the starter in the spring (thereby not missing all the valuable reps both then and in fall camp) like Alpha Coaches and Programs do, Haener would have left, but Yankoff would still be here.

Why do people still want Yankoff? He couldn't throw. He was essentially another Lindquist.

uzi

whatshouldicareabout said:

godawgst said:

Had he announced Skinny as the starter in the spring (thereby not missing all the valuable reps both then and in fall camp) like Alpha Coaches and Programs do, Haener would have left, but Yankoff would still be here.

Why do people still want Yankoff? He couldn't throw. He was essentially another Lindquist.

I read a few places that Yankoff was one of the most athletic guys on our team, even if his accuracy was bad.

I could see Chip molding him into a good dual-threat QB.

godawgst

uzi said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

godawgst said:

Had he announced Skinny as the starter in the spring (thereby not missing all the valuable reps both then and in fall camp) like Alpha Coaches and Programs do, Haener would have left, but Yankoff would still be here.

Why do people still want Yankoff? He couldn't throw. He was essentially another Lindquist.

I read a few places that Yankoff was one of the most athletic guys on our team, even if his accuracy was bad.

I could see Chip molding him into a good dual-threat QB.

I'd want him over Haener.

ntxduck

Down side would be half the first team reps were wasted on not sirmon

EwaDawg

ntxduck said:

Down side would be half the first team reps were wasted on not sirmon

Sorry. Didn't realize you CANT FUCKING READ.


"Two adequate back ups that can get some reps during UH and EWU games."

Stick to what you fucking know. Maybe fucking paper dolls or something.

ntxduck

EwaDawg said:

ntxduck said:

Down side would be half the first team reps were wasted on not sirmon

Sorry. Didn't realize you CANT FUCKING READ.


"Two adequate back ups that can get some reps during UH and EWU games."

Stick to what you fucking know. Maybe fucking paper dolls or something.

Lol. Big football brain on this guy here.

BeerThirty

uzi said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

godawgst said:

Had he announced Skinny as the starter in the spring (thereby not missing all the valuable reps both then and in fall camp) like Alpha Coaches and Programs do, Haener would have left, but Yankoff would still be here.

Why do people still want Yankoff? He couldn't throw. He was essentially another Lindquist.

I read a few places that Yankoff was one of the most athletic guys on our team, even if his accuracy was bad.

I could see Chip molding him into a good dual-threat QB.

yeah if Chip actually gave a fuck