despite the national narrative that the Pac12 sucks, it would be pretty challenging for the media to vote against our schedule when 4/5 of the Pac12 North teams are in the top 25 and Utah is at 14.
despite the national narrative that the Pac12 sucks, it would be pretty challenging for the media to vote against our schedule when 4/5 of the Pac12 North teams are in the top 25 and Utah is at 14.
Yeah but only two or three of those teams will be ranked at the end of the year.
despite the national narrative that the Pac12 sucks, it would be pretty challenging for the media to vote against our schedule when 4/5 of the Pac12 North teams are in the top 25 and Utah is at 14.
Yeah but only two or three of those teams will be ranked at the end of the year.
That part is fine. What usually matters when ranking everyone but Bama and Notre Dame is starting strong.
despite the national narrative that the Pac12 sucks, it would be pretty challenging for the media to vote against our schedule when 4/5 of the Pac12 North teams are in the top 25 and Utah is at 14.
Yeah but only two or three of those teams will be ranked at the end of the year.
That part is fine. What usually matters when ranking everyone but Bama and Notre Dame is starting strong.
UW, Utah, and WSU play nobody out of conference.
Oregon and Stanford are likely to lose their marquee nonconference game.
Pac 12 strength is likely to weigh on UW's ranking all year.
Our high was 9, low was 19. Oregon’s high was 6 (!) low was 21.
I assume neither were unranked on any ballots but I didn’t verify that.
I need to read through threads before I do anything. I just spent 2 minutes squinting at my phone to see our? high/low and to verify we? are on everyone’s ballot.
Comments
LOLZ
Oregon and Stanford are likely to lose their marquee nonconference game.
Pac 12 strength is likely to weigh on UW's ranking all year.
I assume neither were unranked on any ballots but I didn’t verify that.
And still crazy how everyone thinks Oregon is better than UW.